Title: Comment:
1Comment Internationalisation of RD - German
viewpointChristopher Palmberg, Research
Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA)
- Empirically rich analysis of topical issue
position of incumbent NIS in new global division
of labour in RD - Potential limitations industries/firms are
multi-technology, choice of RD location
indicator, exclusion of software almost by
default - Possible interpretations/hypothesis (cf. Mariani
2002) - science-based RD increasingly detached from
production - application-oriented RD stickier in this sense
- compare e.g. with chain-linked-model (Kline
Rosenberg 1986), which are the possible
implications?
2Global distribution of industrial production by
regions 1750-2003
Source Bairoch (1982), ETLA
3Can incumbent NIS maintain/develop their global
position in science-based RD?
- Small absolute size/scarce resources (is
economies of scope enough?) competition from
BRIC countries - Complementarities between science-based and
application-oriented RD - Schumpeterian creative combinations
science/application mixtures high/low-tech
mixtures tangible/intangible mixtures - will advanced lead users of science-based RD
also relocate? - Internationalisation of science-based RD
internationalisation of educational and public
research system - Incumbent NIS at a disadvantage in terms of
unfavorable age distributions?
4Finnish viewpoint as measured through patents?
Share of foreign patents of MNEs at USPTO
- Inventor team grown in size, mainly entry of US,
Germans and Swedes - Low share of foreign patents but these score
higher by originality - Share highest in ICT, electronics (Nokia) lowest
in mechanical - Ongoing reseach
- inward vs. outward RD
- nature of RD
- MAs vs. alliances
- good or bad?
1987-90 1991-95
Belgium 56 67
UK 50 56
Holland 54 56
Switzerland 43 52
Canada 40 44
Sweden 31 42
France 18 33
Germany 17 21
Finland 1985-89 13 1990-94 17 1995-99 21
Affiliation of first inventor foreign
? Palmberg Pajarinen (2004), ETLA Discussion
Paper no. 916