Chapter 4 Distance Vector Routing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 4 Distance Vector Routing

Description:

Prof. Rick Han, University of Colorado at Boulder. Announcements ... Prof. Rick Han, University of Colorado at Boulder. B and C Count to Infinity (2) A ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: profri
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 4 Distance Vector Routing


1
Chapter 4Distance Vector Routing
  • Professor Rick Han
  • University of Colorado at Boulder
  • rhan_at_cs.colorado.edu

2
Announcements
  • Programming assignment 2 is due Saturday March 1
    by 1159 pm
  • Short Homework 3 due Thurs Feb. 20
  • Homework 1 solutions should be up soon
  • Midterm probably week of March 11 13
  • Next, more on IP routing,

3
Recap of Previous Lecture
  • ARP
  • IP Forwarding Tables
  • Destination and Output Port
  • IP Routing
  • Distributed algorithm to create Forwarding Tables
  • Calculate shortest path to each node
  • Distance Vector (RIP)
  • Send distance vectors to neighbors
  • Update route to each destination thru closest
    neighbor
  • If neighbor X is closer than neighbor Y to
    destination D, then route thru X to D

4
Link Failure Causes Bouncing Effect
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
1
X
A
B
B
A
1
1
B
A
C
2
C
1
B
C
1
25
C
dest
cost
via
A
2
B
B
1
B
5
B Notices A-B Link Failure
B notices failure, resets cost via A to infinity
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A
1
B
C
2
C
1
B
C
1
25
C
dest
cost
via
A
2
B
B
1
B
6
C Sends Dist. Vector to B
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A
3
1
B
C
C
2
C
1
B
C
1
25
C
dest
cost
via
A
2
B
B
1
B
7
B Updates Distance to A
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A
3
C
1
B
C
2
C
1
B
C
Packet sent to A from C bounces between C and
B until TTL0!
1
25
C
8
B Sends Dist. Vector to C
dest
cost
via
dest
cost
via
A
B
B
A
3
C
1
B
C
2
B
C
1
C
  • C updates distance to A from 2 to 4. Why
    increase the distance?
  • Because shortest path was thru B B just
    advertised a new distance

1
25
C
9
C Sends Dist. Vector to B
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A
5
C
1
B
C
2
C
1
B
C
B adds one to Cs advertised distance to A.
(overrides its stored distance of 3 to A with
5, larger value)
1
25
C
dest
cost
via
A
4
B
B
1
B
10
Link Failure Bad News Travels Slowly
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A
25
C
26
C
C
25
C
1
C
C
After 20 exchanges, routing tables look like
this
1
25
Assume A has advertised its link cost of 25 to C
during Blt-gtC exchanges. C ignores these as too
large (or could store in its distance table (not
shown))
C
dest
cost
via
A
24
B
B
1
B
11
Bad News Travels Slowly (2)
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A
25
C
26
C
C
25
C
1
C
C
B sends its dist Vector, C updates dist to A to
26 via B
1
25
C
12
Bad News Travels Slowly (3)
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A
25
C
26
C
C
25
C
1
C
C
A sends its distance vector to C, so C chooses
shorter path of 25 via A
1
25
C
13
Bad News Travels Slowly (4)
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A
26
C
26
C
C
25
C
1
C
C
After 25 B-C exchanges, finally converge
to stable routing
1
25
C
dest
cost
via
A
25
A
B
1
B
14
Link Failure Causes Counting to Infinity Effect
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
1
X
A
B
B
A
1
1
B
A
C
2
C
1
B
C
1
25
C
dest
cost
via
A
2
B
B
1
B
15
B Notices A-B Link Failure
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A
1
B
C
2
C
1
B
C
1
25
C
dest
cost
via
A
2
B
B
1
B
16
C Sends Dist. Vector to B
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A
3
C
1
B
C
2
C
1
B
C
1
25
C
dest
cost
via
A
2
B
B
1
B
17
A-C Link Fails
dest
cost
via
A
B
A
3
C
C
1
C
1
  • C detects link to A has failed, but no change in
    Cs routing table. Why?
  • Shortest path to A is via B, not C

C
dest
cost
via
A
2
B
B
1
B
18
B and C Count to Infinity
dest
cost
via
A
B
A
3
C
C
1
C
1
C
dest
cost
via
A
4
B
B
1
B
19
B and C Count to Infinity (2)
dest
cost
via
A
B
A
5
C
C
1
C
1
C
dest
cost
via
A
4
B
B
1
B
20
How are These Loops Caused?
  • Observation 1
  • Bs metric increases
  • Observation 2
  • C picks B as next hop to A
  • But, the implicit path from C to A includes
    itself (C ) !

21
Solution 1 Holddowns
  • If metric increases, delay propagating
    information
  • In our example, B sees its metric increase and
    delays advertising its distance vector
  • C eventually thinks Bs route is gone, picks its
    own route
  • B then selects C as next hop
  • Adversely affects convergence from failures

22
Other Solutions
  • Split horizon
  • Cs distance vector does not advertise routes
    thru B that it learned from B
  • Poisoned reverse
  • Cs distance vector advertises routes thru B that
    it learned from B with infinite distance
  • Works for two node loops
  • Does not work for loops with more nodes

23
B Notices A-B Link Failure
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A
1
B
C
2
C
1
B
C
1
25
C
dest
cost
via
A
2
B
B
1
B
24
Split Horizon
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A


1
B
C
2
C
1
B
C
25
C
dest
cost
via
A
25
A
C updates its path to A through A (knows its
link cost to A)
B
1
B
25
Split Horizon (2)
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A
26
C
1
B
C
2
C
1
B
C
1
25
dest
cost
C
dest
cost
via
A B 1
25
A
25
A
B
1
B
26
Split Horizon With Poisoned Reverse
dest
cost
dest
cost
via
via
A
B
B
A

--
1
B
C
2
C
1
B
C
1
25
dest
cost
C
dest
cost
via
A

A
2
B
B
1
B
1
B
If lowest cost path is via B, then when updating
B send infinite cost
27
Example Where Split Horizon Fails
  • When link breaks, C marks D as unreachable and
    reports that to A and B
  • Suppose A learns it first
  • A now thinks best path to D is through B
  • A reports D unreachable to B and a route of
    cost3 to C
  • C thinks D is reachable through A at cost 4 and
    reports that to B
  • B reports a cost 5 to A who reports new cost to C
  • etc...

1
A
B
1
1
C
X
1
D
28
Avoiding the Counting to Infinity Effect
  • Select loop-free paths
  • One way of doing this
  • Each route advertisement carries entire path
  • If a router sees itself in path, it rejects the
    route
  • BGP does it this way
  • Space proportional to diameter

29
Loop Freedom at Every Instant?
  • Does bouncing effect avoid loops?
  • No! Transient loops are still possible
  • Why? Because implicit path information may be
    stale
  • See this in BGP convergence
  • Only way to fix this
  • Ensure that you have up-to-date information by
    explicitly querying

30
Loop Prevention in Practice
  • RIP and RIP2
  • Uses split-horizon/poison reverse
  • BGP
  • Propagates entire path
  • Path also used for effecting policies

31
Bellman-Ford Equation
  • Distance vector RIP based on distributed
    implementation of Bellman-Ford algorithm
  • Bellman-Ford equation
  • Label routers iA, B, C,
  • Let D(i,j) distance for best route from i to
    remote j
  • Let d(i,j) distance from router i to neighbor j
  • Set to infinity if ij or i and j not immediate
    neighbors

32
Bellman-Ford Equation (2)
  • Bellman-Ford equation
  • D(i,j) min d(i,k) D(k,j) for all iltgtj
  • k
  • neighbors
  • Ex. D(B,F) min d(B,k) D(k,F)
  • kA,C,E

33
Bellman-Ford Algorithm
  • Bellman-Ford equation
  • D(i,j) min d(i,k) D(k,j) for all iltgtj
  • k neighbors
  • Bellman-Ford Algorithm solves B-F Equation
  • To calculate D(i,j), node i only needs d(i,k)s
    and D(k,j)s from neighbors
  • Problem dont know D(k,j)s
  • Solution
  • For each node i, first find shortest distance
    path from i to j using one link, D(i,j)1
  • Shortest distance path using two or fewer links,
    D(i,j)2, must depend on the shortest distance
    path using one link, namely D(i,j)2 min
    d(i,j) D(i,j)1

34
Bellman-Ford Algorithm (2)
  • Key observation
  • By induction, the best (h1 or fewer)-hop path
    between nodes i and j must be arise from an
    i-to-neighbor link connected with a (h or
    fewer)-hop path from neighbor to j
  • D(i,j)h1 min d(i,k) D(k,j)h
  • Bellman-Ford Algorithm
  • D(i,j)h1 min d(i,k) D(k,j)h for all
    iltgtj, h0,1,
  • k neighbors
  • Iterate h0,1,2, until reach diameter DM of
    graph
  • D(i,j)DM is the originally desired B-F solution
    D(i,j) !
  • At each h, calculate D(i,j)h1 for all iltgtj
  • At h0, D(i,j)0 0 for ij, infinity
    otherwise
  • D(i,i)h link cost on which dist. vector is
    sent - 1

35
Bellman-Ford Algorithm Example
  • Suppose C wants to find shortest path to each
    destination
  • First, calculate shortest one-link paths from
    each node easy, D(i,j)1d(i,j)
  • D(C,B)1, D(C,D)1, and
  • D(B,A)1, D(B,E)1, D(B,C)1, and
  • D(D,E)1, D(D,C)1, and
  • D(A,B)1, D(A,E)1, D(A,F)1, and
  • D(E,A)1, D(E,B)1, D(E,D)1, D(E,F)1, and
  • D(F,A)1, D(F,E)1

36
Bellman-Ford Algorithm Example (2)
  • Second, calculate shortest 2-or-fewer hop paths
    from each node
  • Example for node C to F
  • D(C,F)2 min (d(C,k) D(k,F)1) for all j
  • k neighbors
  • min d(C,B) D(B,F)1, d(C,D)
    D(D,F)1
  • No one-link path from B to F, so D(B,F)1 is
    infinity, same for D(D,F)1
  • Calculate D(i,j)2 for all other combinations of
    iltgtj

37
Bellman-Ford Algorithm Example (3)
  • Third, calculate shortest 3-or-fewer hop paths
    from each node
  • Example for node C to F
  • D(C,F)3 min d(C,B) D(B,F)2, d(C,D)
    D(D,F)2
  • No more unknowns
  • D(B,F)2 is known by now and was calculated in
    the last iteration, mind(B,k) D(k,F)1
  • D(D,F)2 is also known
  • Since diameter 3, were done and have found all
    shortest distance paths D(i,j)

38
Distributed Bellman-Ford Algorithm
  • Bellman-Ford Algorithm
  • D(i,j)h1 min d(i,k) D(k,j)h for all
    iltgtj, h0,1,
  • k neighbors
  • One way to implement in a real network
  • Flood d(i,j) first to every router in the network
  • Calculate B-F Algorithm in each router
  • Drawbacks
  • Generates lots of overhead
  • Requires much computation on each router
  • Duplication of many of calculations on each
    router
  • Consider an alternative to distribute calculations

39
Distributed Bellman-Ford Algorithm (2)
  • Bellman-Ford Algorithm
  • D(i,j)h1 min d(i,k) D(k,j)h for all
    iltgtj, h0,1,
  • k neighbors
  • Key observations
  • We had to calculate D(i,j)h for each node i in
    the graph, at each step h in the iteration
  • At every iteration h, we only needed information
    about the h-1 or fewer hop paths to calculate
    D(i,j)h

40
Distributed Bellman-Ford Algorithm (3)
  • Therefore, in a real network,
  • Physically distribute the calculation of
    D(i,j)h to router i only, and
  • No duplication
  • Less calculation
  • Exchange the results of your D(i,j)h with
    neighboring routers at each iteration h
  • Less overhead
  • Satisfies condition that D(i,j)h only needs
    info on h-1 or less hop paths.
  • At iteration h, d(i,j) within radius h-1 will be
    propagated to all routers within radius h-1

41
Distributed Bellman-Ford Algorithm (4)
  • In practice, convergence will eventually occur
    even if different routers are slow to propagate
    or calculate their D(i,j)h and/or d(i,j)
  • Bertsekas and Gallagher proved this, in the
    absence of topology changes
  • Distributed routing algorithm where each router
    only performs a small but sufficient part of the
    overall B-F algorithm
  • Node i calculates and sends D(i,j)h to its
    neighbors this is a distance vector
  • Distributed Bellman-Ford Algorithm Distance
    Vector Algorithm

42
Distance Table
  • Bellman-Ford Algorithm
  • D(i,j)h1 min d(i,k) D(k,j)h for all
    iltgtj, h0,1,
  • k neighbors
  • Each router i must maintain a distance table
  • Must store d(i,k), D(k,j)h for each neighbor k
    and destination j

43
Distance Table (2)
  • In reality, each cell in distance table stores
    d(i,k) D(k,j)h, not just D(k,j)h
  • Must store d(i,k) or receive it within a
    neighbors distance vector advertisement
  • If d(i,k) is a hop, then d(i,j)1 always, so no
    need to store

44
Routing Table
  • Easy to derive a Routing Table from a distance
    table choose the minimum distance in the row
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com