Engineering Design Status of the Quasi-Poloidal Stellarator, QPS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Engineering Design Status of the Quasi-Poloidal Stellarator, QPS

Description:

Engineering Design Status of the QuasiPoloidal Stellarator, QPS – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: Ban81
Learn more at: https://ncsx.pppl.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Engineering Design Status of the Quasi-Poloidal Stellarator, QPS


1
Engineering Design Status of the Quasi-Poloidal
Stellarator, QPS
  • Presented by B. Nelson for the QPS Team
  • SOFE 05
  • September 28, 2005
  • Knoxville, TN

2
QPS team
  • ORNL Lee Berry, Mike Cole, Paul Fogarty, Kevin
    Freudenberg, Paul Goranson, Steve Hirshman, Jim
    Lyon, Don Spong, Dennis Strickler, Dave
    Williamson, Gary Lovett, Tom Hargrove, Martin
    Brown, John White, Jim Tsai
  • PPPL Phil Heitzenroeder, Hutch Neilson, Larry
    Sutton, Frank Malinowski, Jim Chrzanowski
  • Univ. of Tennessee Bob Benson, Tom Shannon,
    Arnold Lumsdaine, Madhu Madhukar, Masood Parang,
    Anut Chaudhri, Shankar Narasimhaswami, S.
    Sridharan, Shing-Jia Tang
  • J.P. Pattern John Puhl, Gary Puhl
  • Waukesha Kramer Foundry Bill Norris
  • New England Wire Technologies Lana Superchi,
    Clayton Elliot

3
Presentation outline
  • Introduction
  • What is QPS?
  • Basic device description, for each element
  • What is the baseline design?
  • What are the issues?
  • What RD is planned or underway?
  • Assembly
  • Summary

4
What is QPS?
  • QPS is a compact stellarator to be built at ORNL
    by a consortium including ORNL, the University of
    Tennessee, and PPPL.
  • Compact stellarators have tremendous promise,
    combining the best features of tokamaks and
    stellarators
  • High beta (gt4) stability
  • No tokamak-like disruptions (no VDEs, zero or
    small plasma current)
  • No current drive required for steady state
    operation
  • Vertical and kink stability without a conducting
    wall or feedback system, even in highly elongated
    plasma configurations
  • Low aspect ratio compared to more conventional
    stellarators
  • QPS will study new physics regimes, complement
    NCSX
  • Quasi-poloidal symmetry allows low damping for
    poloidal flows that disrupt turbulent eddies
    causing anomalous transport
  • Extends stellarator physics to very low aspect
    ratio

5
QPS device
OH Solenoid Inner TF Coil Legs
Inner Poloidal Field Coil
Outer Poloidal Field Coil
Outer Toroidal Field Coil Leg
Shell
Plasma
Modular Coil
Vacuum Vessel
Divertor
Outer VF Coils
Diagnostic or Pumping Port
Support Posts
6
Baseline parameters for QPS design
Average major radius Average plasma radius Plasma aspect ratio Plasma volume Average field on axis from the set of modular coils Auxiliary toroidal field Ohmic current ECH power ICRF heating power 0.91 m 0.30.4 m 2.5 2-3 m3 B 1 T for 1.5-s pulse 0.15 T 0 to 100 kA 0.6-2 MW 24 MW
7
QPS Coil Set
Coil Set Function, Coil set provides
Modular Coils Basic quasi-poloidally symmetric magnetic configuration
Vertical Field Coils Inductive current drive, plasma position control, plasma shaping
Toroidal Field Coils Addition or subtraction of toroidal field for control of magnetic transform
8
Modular coil configuration has 20 coils, 5 shapes
1.78 m
1.46 m
Coil 1
Coil 2
2.12 m
2.08 m
2.02 m
Coil 3
Coil 4
Coil 5 Bean Section
9
Continuous shell forms robust structure
  • Shell consists of individual modular coil forms
    that are bolted together
  • Penetrations for access are provided wherever
    needed
  • Thickness can be optimized to reduce stresses,
    deflection
  • Stellarator symmetry preserved, two toroidal
    electrical breaks

Electrical breaks
77
10
Prototype winding form is in production
  • Casting is almost complete
  • Machined sand mold is accurate, cost effective
  • Modified CF8M has low permeability, air quench
  • Machining to start in November

M1
As cast wt. 7900 lbs
11
Casting technique is ideal for prototypes
  • Machined mold technique eliminates pattern
  • Reinforced sand blocks are machined with router
  • Mold cavity is very accurate compared to foam
    pattern technique
  • No need to provide draft, other features related
    to conventional technique using hard patter

Density
Mold model
Pouring 15000 lbs
Machining mold part
  • Flow solidification analysis, mold design require
    many iterations

12
Conductor wound directly on winding forms
Winding form
Winding Pack
Current center, located within /- 1 mm
2 coils per form
13
Flexible cable is used for the conductor
  • Parameters
  • Coil Envelope 6.1 x 2.7 inches
  • Current / Coil 300 (nom) to
  • 380-kA (max)
  • Number of Elec. Turns 14
  • Avg length per turn 120 in
  • Nominal current / turn 21.4 kA
  • Cable Size .44 x .44 in
  • Heat removed via co-wound channels
  • Net Current Density 5.1 6.5-kA/cm2
  • Total peak power 40 MW
  • Flexible cable used to wind coil

14
Coil parameters, power supply, cooling temp.
determine pulse waveform and flat-top time
15
Cooling water is distributed in winding pack
  • Winding is cooled by conduction to cooling lines
    in winding pack

Electrical turn, ( 1 of 14)
Option 1
Option 2
Option 3
Each conductor has an imbedded cooling tube
Flexible SST tubing replaces conductor
Smaller copper tubing replaces conductor
16
Option 1 has best cooling, opt. 2,3 would ratchet

Option 3
Option 2
Option 1
Ref K. Freudenberg, PIII.b-16,
17
Conductor RD underway to select cable
  • Issue
  • Would like to use internal or co-wound cooling
    channels (to avoid cladding and chill plates)
  • Progress
  • Internally cooled cable shipped last week
  • Flexible stainless tube on order
  • Results
  • Filling copper (or Teflon) tubes with Pb-Bi
    eutectic is feasible
  • Emptying the eutectic cannot be accomplished with
    forced air only some residue remains
  • Copper tubing work hardens, increasing winding
    difficulty

Cable with half-lapped fiberglass insulation
.425 in (10.8 mm)
Ref M. Madhukar, PI.a-4,
18
We plan to wind the coils at Univ. of Tennessee
  • Space has been prepared in the recently completed
    Magnet Development Laboratory (MDL), a UT
    facility.
  • All winding/canning/potting processes are being
    developed through RD at this facility.

Ref P. Fogarty, PIII.b-10,
19
Rolling cart fixture avoids handling issues
  • Winding form shipped from vendor on cart, stays
    on cart for all winding, canning, VPI processing
    and shipping to ORNL

End View
20
Winding RD
  • Building on experience from NCSX, but
  • Must modify technique to provide clamp-free
    condition to install vacuum can
  • Investigating alternate methods to provide ground
    insulation
  • Progress
  • Practice coils wound using prototypical clamping
    techniques
  • Twisted Tee winding form fabricated
  • Results
  • Cable easily positioned into winding form
  • setting counteracted keystoning effects
  • Clamps could be removed with virtually no
    conductor movement

NCSX Ref J. Chrzanowski, PIII.b-4,
21
Cyanate ester system chosen over epoxy
  • Coils must operate at elevated temperature (40-
    100 C goal) to maintain good vacuum properties
  • Composite Technology Development (CTD) has
    developed high temperature cyanate ester material
    CTD 403
  • Room temp processing (100 centi-poise), pot life
    several days
  • Hydrophobic, may not be affected by water leaks
  • Mechanical properties similar for both CTD 101K
    and CTD 403, but additional tests are planned for
    CTD 403
  • Bakeout temperature will be limited by thermal
    stress and creep properties, but are much better
    for CTD 403

22
Vacuum Pressure Impregnation (VPI)
  • Progress
  • VPI system set up at UT MDL
  • Four turn racetrack coil VPI-ed
  • Results
  • Good wicking into cable
  • Cyanate ester has very long pot life and is
    injected at room temperature
  • Curing cycle easily achieved with temperature
    feedback system
  • Next steps
  • Measure mechanical and thermal properties
  • Repeat twice and on twisted racetrack coil

Ref Univ. of Tennessee
23
Vacuum canning is required for QPS coils
Winding Pack
Vacuum Weld
Vacuum Can
Seam Weld
24
Vacuum canning RD distortion, temp. ok
  • Mockup fabricated and welded
  • Welds made w/o filler or special weld preps,
    trepans
  • Distortion
  • Calculation very localized, .002 in
  • Measured very small, lt .002 in.
  • Temperature
  • Weld temperature at windings benign, glass
    insulation is not damaged

Ref A. Lumsdaine, PIII.b-12
25
Castings are also o.k. in vacuum
  • Vacuum testing performed on prototypical cast
    material
  • Results
  • Pressure continued to drop after several days
  • No indication of connected porosity, virtual
    leaks, etc.
  • Surface was as-cast, but will be polished on
    production article

26
TF and VF coils
VF Coils
  • Center Stack
  • Includes
  • TF Inner Legs
  • Solenoid
  • Vac. boundary

Outer TF Legs
27
VF Coils / Solenoid
  • 4 pairs of VF coils are included in design
  • All but one VF coil pair already exist
  • Inner VF PBX-DF-1 coil
  • Inner VF PBX-OH5 coil
  • Mid VF ATF mid coil
  • Solenoid and outer PF pair would require new set
    of windings

Solenoid
ATF Coils
PBX Coils
28
Limited room for Centerstack
  • Centerstack includes TF coils, OH solenoid and
    vacuum casing
  • Available clear vertical bore is 15 x 100 cm

Plasma
Centerstack
Midplane Cross section
29
Centerstack integrates solenoid, TF coils
Bushings
Stays/Pins 0.5
Outer Shell (0.4)
TF Coil turns
  • Forces require complex design with ties across
    winding
  • Plasma current not needed for magnetic
    configuration, only used as knob
  • VF coils can provide adequate flux swing to
    drive plasma current
  • solenoid may be eliminated

30
TF coils
Centerstack turns
Outboard legs
  • 48 turns
  • 1.5 x .75 in. centerstack turns
  • 3.5 x .75 in. outboard
  • /- 0.15 T (14 kA / turn)
  • 2100 A/cm2 centerstack turns
  • 850 A/cm2 outboard
  • 12 return leg bundles
  • Odd shape requires transition jumpers at center
    stack
  • Stellarator symmetry is preserved

Transition jumpers
31
QPS will use external vacuum vessel
  • Eliminates complexity of internal vessel ,
    provides maximum envelope for plasma
  • Good access with large (28 inch o.d.) ports
    around midplane, top and bottom
  • PF, TF coils outside, modular coils inside
  • Bakeout to 150C, operation RT 40C
  • Good vacuum for plasma operation
  • Parameters
  • Material 316L ss
  • Nominal outer radius 171 inches
  • Maximum height 131 inches
  • Inside surface area 56 m2
  • Enclosed volume (with ports) 34 m3
  • Time Constant - toroidal 10 ms - poloidal
    2 ms

32
VV has good access for diagnostics, heating
(2 x 8) 2 diameter upper / lower ports
(2 x 12) 12 x 20 upper /lower vert. ports
(2 x 2) 2 x 4 upper /lower vert. ports
(12) 24 diameter radial ports
Views looking into radial ports
Ref M. Cole, PII.a-6
33
Good access for maintenance
Access thru vertical ports
Access thru midplane ports
and Both vessel domes are removeable
Vessel spool piece supported from mod coils
34
Core assembly sequence
Assemble mod coil / shell on support legs
Suspend vessel from mod coil shell
Install VV domes, TF and VF coils
35
Summary
  • QPS is a compact stellarator to be built at ORNL,
    and is currently in RD and prototyping phase.
  • QPS represents a combined effort of ORNL, the
    University of Tennessee and PPPL
  • The QPS design concept meets performance
    requirements
  • 20 coil, 2 period modular coil set with
    integrated structure
  • OH, VF, and TF coil sets
  • External vacuum vessel
  • Capable of 1.5 s flat-top at 1 Tesla
  • Modular Coils are key element and subject of
    ongoing RD

36
Backup
37
Two compact stellarators planned for US program
NCSX (in fabrication) and QPS (design/RD phase)
National Compact Stellarator Experiment lt R0 gt
1.4 m, ltagt .33m Btor 2 T, A 4.3, Ip lt 350
kA
Quasi-Poloidal Stellarator lt R0 gt 0.9 m, ltagt
.34m Btor 1 T, A 2.7, Ip lt 150 kA
38
Fabrication Plans and Options
  • Most components built off-site and pre-assembled
    to the extent possible

System Fabrication By
Vacuum Vessel Commercial Tank manufacturer
Conventional Coils - TF, PF, Centerstack assy - PF coils exist, refurbish on site- Centerstack, TF similar to NSTX, (but integration by vendor)
Modular Coils Winding forms by qualified vendor Winding, VPI, canning by Univ. TN
Structures - connecting structures, base columns Commercial manf, same as VV if possible
Coil Services - electrical leads, cooling Commercial leads, piping on site
Assembly, incl. mod coil field period sub-assembly Assembly on-site by ORNL craft
39
Cooling at exit
40
Modular coil forces
  • Minimum sheer case has highest normal operating
    loads
  • Abnormal loading 40 higher (e.g. power supply
    sends max current)

Max centering load 116 kips
41
Modular coil forces
()
42
Modular coil forces
Almost no force away from ell
43
Modular coil running load summary for all cases
shows only one with net force away from ell
44
Stress in modular coil shell
  • Stresses limited to 17 ksi
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com