Title: NEA Demographic and Household Model 2006 Technical Updates
1NEA Demographic and Household Model2006
Technical Updates
RSS Technical Group Meeting 9 January 2007 Stella
House, Newcastle-upon -Tyne
- David Mell
- Knowledge Manager
- North East Regional Information Partnership
2NEA Demographic and Household Model
- Overview of the model
- Technical update details
- Current status
3The population model is a hybrid of one-year and
five-year age bands and projections
Generally age bands have a 5 year span
0 yrs and 1-4 yrs bands are exceptions
The population is modelled at 5 year intervals
Except 0 yrs band modelled annually
After accounting for deaths and effects of
migration 5-9 yrs band in 2005 becomes 10-14 yrs
band in 2010
Similarly for other 5 year bands
Less Deaths plus Net Migration
0 yrs and 1-4 yrs combine to give the 5-9 years
band
0 yrs band from 4 successive years provides the
1-4 yrs band
0 yrs band is product of female population and
fertility rate
Intermediate years calculated either directly
(1-4 yrs band) or by interpolation (other bands)
Intermediate years (female) population allows
calculation of intermediate years births
Future population Current population Births
Deaths Migration
4The population model is a set of mechanistic
calculations
- Pop(Band1,Year5) Pop(Band,Year)
Surv(Band,Year)?(Band1,Year5)
Migr(Band1,Y5) - where Pop(Band,Year) mid-year population in
age band Surv 5-year survival rate Migr
Cumulative effect of migration into age band
over 5 year period (defined by period end) - Births(Year) SPop(Band,Year) Fert(Band,Year)
- where Pop is female population Summation is
over age bands of child-bearing age Fert is
fertility rate
Key values are Survival Rates, Fertility Rates
and Migration
5Population Projections are converted to
Projections of Households and Dwellings Required
Population Projection byLocal Authority
Population living in Households
Occupied Households
6Migration is dealt with through a scenario
representing policy assumptions
Migration into 30-34 Age Band over 5 years ending
mid-2015
7Five year survival calculation is based on annual
mortality rates
Know mb,y - Mortality rate by band and year
Surviving populationy1 Popb,y (1-mb,y)
Surviving populationy5 Popb.y (1-my)
(1-my1) (1-my2) (1-my3) (1-my4)
Popb,y (1-mAve)5
8Mortality rates are projected on basis of
national rate changes
mb,y1 mb,y (nb,y1/nb,y) where m local
authority mortality rate n national mortality
rate
- National rates are projected by Government
Actuarys Department (GAD) - All future rates for a local authority can be
projected from a starting (base year) rate (LA
specific) - Relationship implies mb,y Constantb nb,y
(for all y) - Relationship has been tested
- Fertility rates projected in exactly same way
- Again, local/national rate assumption tested
9Establishing the base rates for projection has
been a complex process
Spreadsheet model Base Year 2003
There has to be a better way!
10Mortality Rates in Practice 1
- Any process for projecting rates will contain
statistical error - The calibration factors represent these errors
- Statistical errors random, systematic (bias)
- Time effects confirmed by ANOVA and ANCOVA models
11Mortality Rates in Practice - 2
- Mortality is a convex function of age
- Consequently, experienced average rate is less
than arithmetic average of two age bands
12Mortality Rates Problem and Solution
- Use 2001-2005 actual data
- No projection of mortality rates
- Apply averaging process to estimate deaths in
period - Compare with actuals
- Persistent bias 3-3.5 at regional level based on
calculations performed at local authority level - 1995-2000 similar
- This is what calibration factors attempting to
correct - Underlying problem is the 5050 weighting of
successive age bands - Convexity means 5050 overestimates mortality
rates and hence deaths - 6040 eliminates bias
- Pragmatic finding
- Theoretical approaches which model mortality
rates using an exponential function suggest
similar weighting with little age variation - No need for calibration factors (calibrating in
random error!)
Outcome use 6040 weightings in 5 year rate
calculations
13Estimating Base Year Mortality Rates(Base Year
2005)
- Fit linear regression model to 2001-2005 data
using OLS - Base year value fitted value for 2005
- Regression is trend-based average
- If fitted value is negative use simple average
instead - In practice only ages from around 55 upwards
matter - Same approach for fertility less critical for
housing!!
14Summary of Technical Updates 2006
- Simplification of calculation of base year
mortality and fertility rates - Complex process replaced by simple linear
regression - Calculation of 5-year survival rates adjusted
- 5050 weighting of successive bands replaced by
6040 - Correction of errors in migration accumulation
calculation (migration roll-up) - Some incorrect co-efficients detected in
spreadsheet - Re-implementation of model in MS Access
- Makes re-basing a 3 minute job instead of 3
months - Data and calculations one and once only more
maintainable - Separates calculations from presentation
- Validation of population calculations via
spreadsheet - Right tool for the job
- Stepping stone to a 1-year model
Otherwise, unchanged !!
15NEA Demographic and Household Model
- Overview of the model
- Technical update details
- Current status