Crisis Management: Two Case Studies from China - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Crisis Management: Two Case Studies from China

Description:

Crises are ubiquitous in modern times. The cost of mismanaging crises is ... panic and the approaching chemical slick (to Harbin), the government was forced ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1422
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: MRS121
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Crisis Management: Two Case Studies from China


1
Crisis Management Two Case Studies from China
  • Krishnamurthy Sriramesh
  • Associate Professor
  • School of Communication and Information
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • Singapore 637718
  • Dr. Zengzhi Shi
  • Associate Professor
  • Peking University, Beijing, China

2
Importance of Crisis Management
  • Crises are ubiquitous in modern times
  • The cost of mismanaging crises is higher than
    ever because of
  • Increased stakeholder activism resulting from
    more open communication and flow of information
  • New Technologies
  • Interpersonal communication vs. mass comm
  • Economies in transition and impact on society

3
PetroChem Explosion and its effects
  • On Nov. 13, there was an explosion at PetroChem,
    a govt. chemical plant
  • For nine days the government and the mass media
    were silent about the event and the risks for
    those using the water of the river Songhua,
    polluted by the toxic chemicals from the plant
  • Danger awaited the large city of Harbin which
    relies almost completely on the Songhua water

4
PetroChem Explosion and its aftermath
  • The main media were asked by the government not
    to report the risks of pollution
  • But citizens used new media (mobile phones and
    the Internet) to transmit messages including to
    residents of Harbin mainly through interpersonal
    comm.
  • Around Nov 19th, rumors, including that there
    would be an earthquake in Harbin, began to fly

5
PetroChem Explosion and its aftermath
  • The government reacted by selectively revealing
    the truth to only a few stakeholders
  • Some true facts were revealed only to some
    officials about the danger to the river but not
    to all officials or to the citizens who would be
    affected
  • The local officials abruptly announced on the
    morning of Nov 21 that the water supply to Harbin
    would be shut down for four days beginning Nov 22
    for conducting maintenance and repairs

6
PetroChem Explosion and its aftermath
  • This caused fear among the citizens who started
    emptying shelves of bottled water and other
    drinks at supermarkets
  • Responding to this mass panic and the approaching
    chemical slick (to Harbin), the government was
    forced to announce the truth the same afternoon
  • This crisis had international dimensions as well
    because the Songhua water also goes to parts of
    Russia

7
Common features between SARS and Harbin
  • Areas where improvements can be made
  • 1. The local governments were not truthful until
    events forced them to become more open
  • In the case of SARS this caused the spread of the
    disease within and beyond the borders
  • 2. State-controlled mass media cannot (are unable
    to) communicate the truth
  • media credibility in serious question

8
Common features between SARS and Harbin
  • 3. People couldn't get the truth from the
    Government and so they relied on
  • Access to private (interpersonal) media such as
    mobile phones and the Internet to communicate
    among themselves
  • And engaged in spreading rumors as well a
    classic response to poor communication during
    crises

9
Common features between SARS and Harbin
  • 4. People didn't know whom and what they could
    trust. It was chaotic and people were in panic.
  • 5. The government has a very important role to
    play during crises AND the people still want to
    believe the government
  • So, it is important for the government to try to
    be proactive in communicating facts
  • 6. There is a lot of uncertainty in the way
    crises are handled lack of confidence

10
Common features between SARS and Harbin
  • We also believe there are some good aspects that
    should be continued in the future
  • 1. The government held some high level officials
    who were found to have performed poorly during
    the crisis accountable and punished them
  • 2. The government did admit that mistakes were
    made even if it took time to do so

11
Some observations from these two crises
  • Officers are often worried about their own job
    security and promotions, and so often underplay
    the seriousness of crises not telling their
    seniors what really happened
  • Tendency among officials to wait and see or let
    their senior managers make the tough decisions,
    which delays response
  • Due to media reforms, Chinese public have greater
    access to different kinds of media (including
    foreign) and use it for message sharing. The
    government can't exercise total control over
    information flow now

12
Some observations from these two crises
  • Globalization and a more open society means that
    many foreigners in Beijing or Harbin were able to
    convey the messages they had received from their
    own sources to locals
  • The government wants to reduce losses from crises
    but seems to be deficient in doing it
    proactively. There is a distinct lack of trust
    for the media and the public
  • Crises often have international dimensions as in
    the case of Harbin with Russia being involved

13
Cirsis Mgmt Linking Theory and Practice
  • A. Crisis Detection
  • Through environmental scanning, identify warning
    signs
  • Three organizational resources help in this
    process
  • 1. Issues Management the identification of, and
    action taken to affect, issues (issues often are
    precursors to crises)
  • Issue Evaluation sources likelihood and impact

14
A. Detection of a Crisis
  • 2. Risk Assessment organizational risk factors
    or weaknesses that may develop into crises
  • 3. Stakeholder relationships Favorable
    organization-stakeholder relationships help
    during crises by cushioning negative effects
    Soft Power
  • Good stakeholder comm. also helps you hear
    about potential crises

15
B. Prevention
  • B. Prevention Use warning signs (prodromes) to
    prevent crises from occurring
  • Crisis prevention programs have two basic
    components change and monitoring
  • Make changes that eliminate or reduce the
    likelihood of a warning sign becoming a crisis
  • monitor the environment to see whether the change
    was effective did the change reduce or
    eliminate the chance for a crisis?

16
B. Prevention
  • Issues mgmt as crisis prevention tool identify
    and analyze issues and apply systematic
    procedures to influence issue resolution in the
    organizations favor
  • Risk management as crisis prevention tool
  • Two factors drive the use of risk mgmt strategies
    for crisis mgmt cost and technical
  • a. Cost Risk managers use risk balancing
    (cost-benefit analysis) to compare the costs of
    the risk vs. cost of risk reduction

17
B. Prevention
  • b. Technical Can the risk be reduced or
    eliminated through technical expertise? Eg. Can a
    non-toxic chemical be substituted for a toxic
    chemical, thereby eliminating risk?
  • This is also called risk aversion
  • Relationship management as crisis prevention
    tool
  • Three elements define organization-stakeholder
    relationships
  • Staying close, credibility, and meeting
    expectations

18
B. Prevention
  • a. Staying Close dialogue with stakeholders
    builds mutually beneficial relationships
  • b. Organizational Credibility has two components
    expertise and trustworthiness
  • c. meeting expectations
  • Organizations must conform to the legitimate
    expectations of stakeholdersfailure to do so
    results in conflict with key stakeholder publics
    (activism)

19
C. Preparation
  • Create a crisis portfolio organize the list of
    potential crises relevant to the organization by
    crisis type
  • Diagnose crisis vulnerabilities
  • Develop variations of the CMP (CCP) for each
    crisis type
  • selecting and training the crisis mgmt team and
    spokespersons
  • Stakeholder relationship management (including
    victims families)

20
CMP is not enough!
  • Do not let the presence of a CMP give a false
    sense of security
  • 1. The CMP is a general guideline for action
    representing contingencies
  • 2. The CMP is a living documentorganizations,
    and their environments, are dynamic
  • Review the CMP periodically (once or twice a
    year) to make necessary updates
  • 3. The CMP is of little value if it is not
    practiced in simulations
  • Crisis drills help refine the CMP

21
D. Performance and Learning
  • Once a crisis hits, the crisis team must
  • a. prevent it from spreading to unaffected areas
    of the orgn. or the environment
  • b. limit its duration
  • Comm. is critical to crisis containment and
    recovery
  • Four areas are important during this phase
  • Initial response (quick, consistent, open comm.)
  • reputation management,
  • enactment of contingency and business resumption
    plan, and
  • follow-up communication
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com