Title: Other BEASY Tools: Stiffened Panels
1Other BEASY Tools Stiffened Panels
2Stiffened Panel Models
- Panels Stiffened by Beams
- Rivet Attachments
- Panels Stiffened by doublers
- Rivet Attachments
- Panels with doublers and Beams
3Modelling Doublers
- Doublers are modelled by a 2D boundary element
zone shaped identically to the doubler. - Boundary elements are required on both external
edge and cut outs
4Multiple Beams
- Multiple Beams
- Additional Connectors
5Basic Doubler Example
6Stresses 9 Connectors
Base Panel
Doubler
7Doubler with Multiple Holes
8Panel Stiffened By Ribs
9Simple Panel With Beams
10Effect of Stiffeners
No Beam Deformation Scale Factor 2
With Beam Deformation Scale Factor 2
11Fatigue Growth Comparison
12Growth In Stiffened Panel Structures
- Structures can consist of
- Multiple panels
- Doublers
- Beams ribs etc
- Fasteners
13Design Wizard Simplifies Model Development
14Other BEASY Tools BEASY Contact
15Contact Algorithm
- The BEASY contact algorithm is a constraint based
methodology which results in - Exact representation of surface conditions
- No penalty or artificial spring coefficients
- High accuracy
- Accurate prediction of frictional effects
- Accurate representation of surface stresses and
contact geometry - The algorithm is automatic and self adjusting
- Two types of contact algorithm are available
16Types of Contact Problem
- Conforming contact
- The two surfaces are of similar shape
- A small difference in shape can be modelled using
for example an initial gap or interference fit - A node to node contact algorithm can be used
providing the displacement are not very large
Pin and Lug
17Types of Contact Problem
- Non Conforming Contact (Surface to
Surface) - The two surfaces can be radically different in
shape - Node to node contact cannot normally be used
- Large displacements are possible
18Types of Contact Problem
- BEASY can solve both
- Conforming Contact (Node to Node)
- Non Conforming Contact (Surface to Surface)
19Spline Coupling Analysis
- Contact analysis including
- Friction
- Slip and Contact Pressure
20Spline Shaft Joint Model Under Torque
21BEASY-Non-conforming Contact
22BEASY-Non-conforming Contact
- Resultant displacement on deformed shape
23BEASY-Non-conforming Contact
24Summary
- The BEM surface only technology provides the key
to simulation based design - Substantial savings can be achieved in model
building time - Flexibility to consider alternative design
options quickly. - Product integrity
- Realistic models
25Other BEASY Tools BEASY Contact with Wear
Calculations
26Wear Prediction
- Wear occurs when
- Components are in contact
- The loads are varying causing slip
- Wear can be due to
- Fretting
- Reciprocating wear
- Wear changes the geometry which results in
changes to - Contact Pressure
- Stress distribution
- BEASY provides the information necessary to
predict wear
27Auxiliary Rail Configuration
28Predicting Wear
- The operators of a wagon maintenance depot raised
the question of wear of an auxiliary rail that
was used in an underfloor lifting system. - In order to try to answer this question,
information about the contact stresses and
contact area between the flange and the auxiliary
rail would need to be obtained. - The contact model in BEASY was used to provide
the detailed contact stresses and micro slip
necessary for wear prediction.
29Rail and Wheel Contact Model
30Von Mises Stresses on Wheel and Rail Surfaces.
Deformation
31Wear Prediction
- Wear was calculated for the analysis using
Archards Law - This is a simple wear equation which states that
wear is a function of- - Contact load
- Sliding distance (slip)
- Where
- d is the sliding distance,
- k is a load-independent constant that describes
the wear rate, - W is the contact load
- Y is the material yield stress.
Wear Rate (d.k.W)/Y
32Wear Prediction
Variation of Archards constant k with wear and
lubrication conditions. Source Rabinowicz(1976)
Wear Rate (d.k.W)/Y
33Wear Prediction
- The distribution of wear on the contact surface
can be predicted. - A single value of the wear rate can also be
calculated by averaging the wear results over all
the contact nodes. - The average wear rate that was calculated was
7.2310-6mm per wheel traversal. - For a design life of 10 years, with 24 wheel
traversals per day, the total wear for the
auxiliary rail is estimated to be 0.63mm.
34Other BEASY Tools Contact solutions for a
fretting test example
35Conceptual Model of Fretting Test
36Fretting Tests Mesh
Exploded view
0.01
0.075
0.125
Y
X
0.075
0.1
Cylindrical surface
Flat surface
0.14
37Fretting Tests Loads
Frictionless rollers
To simulate the fretting test the horizontal load
Q is reversed cyclically
x displacement 0
?bulk
y displacement 0
38Fretting Tests Results display
- Graph plots will be shown of variation of results
along the center-line of the contact region on
the surface of the flat block -
Graph plots will show variation of results along
this line
39Horizontal Direct Stress (?xx)
40Vertical Direct Stress (?yy)
41Shear Stress (?xy)
42Fretting Tests
- Shear component of contact stress on surface of
flat block
Bands running in the z direction confirm the
model is behaving in a 2D (plane) way
43Fretting Tests Test 1 (P,Q,sr0)
Non-zero zz component of direct stress confirms
the model is behaving in a 2D plane strain way
44Fretting Tests Test 1 (P,Q,sr0)
Lower peak at right is caused by boundary
conditions. See later investigation into effect
of restraints
Sharp peak has been cut-off by location of
data-points
45Fretting Tests Test 1 (P,Q,sr0)
Result approaches some positive value, reflecting
overall tension at this end of the block
Result approaches zero, reflecting stress-free
condition at this end of the block
Contact region extends here
46Fretting Tests Tests 2-gt6
sr2
sr4
sr6
sr8
sr1
sr0
47Fretting Tests Tests 7 (P,sr2), ie Q0
48Fretting Tests Cyclic load
- The effect of cyclic loading can be investigated,
simply by defining a series of load cases to
represent the different loads - Compressive load
- Side load
- Tension in specimen
- The sequence in which the loads are applied is
then defined - The results of such a study are shown on the next
few slides
49Fretting Tests Cyclic load
50Fretting Tests Cyclic load
51Summary
- The BEM surface only technology provides the key
to simulation based design - Substantial savings can be achieved in model
building time - Flexibility to consider alternative design
options quickly. - Allows wear and fretting to be computed
- Product integrity
- Realistic models
52The BEASY Fracture Wizard
53Example Model
BEASY model with simple surface mesh
No need to model the crack in the BEASY mesh
Generate a 3D model of a plate with a through
edge crack
54Crack Wizard worked example
55Specify the crack initiation point in the
fracture wizard
56Select A Crack From The Wizard Crack Library
The crack library contains a selection of corner
cracks, edge crack and through cracks
Additional cracks can be generated and added to
the library as required
57Select the growth model using the wizard
58Select the material properties
59Choose the loading
60A BEASY Model with the crack is automatically
generated
61The crack growth is automated
62Predicted Crack Growth
Crack has grown to here
63Deformation and stress intensity data