IT Services: A Real Options Thinking Approach

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

IT Services: A Real Options Thinking Approach

Description:

Stage (Stop-resume) Explore (Pilot/ Prototype) Scale up/down. Abandon (switch usage) ... We need very complex maths. Are decision makers willing to trust that? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: pascal58

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IT Services: A Real Options Thinking Approach


1
IT Services A Real Options Thinking Approach
  • Koen Voermans Pascal van Eck
  • Value modeling workshop, Tilburg, Jan. 18-19, 2007

2
Option according to Merriam-Websters
  • something that may be chosen as a an
    alternative course of action ltdidn't have many
    options opengt b an item that is offered in
    addition to or in place of standard equipment
  • a contract conveying a right to buy or sell
    designated securities, commodities, or property
    interest at a specified price during a stipulated
    period

3
Goal of this presentation
Way to value e-services


Real Options Analysis (ROA)
Service bundling
Value objects in e3value
  • Really?
  • Does this have practical value?

4
Overview
Building services out of components
Service marketing risk management
Introduce enh./supp. services later
5
NPV dominant approach
  • NPV Net Present Value

20
30
40
in
1
2
3
year
65
17.5
20
out
sum of discounted net cashflows (NPV)
-14.5
6
Configuration of Service
  • Core service describes value from customer
    perspective
  • Supporting services needed to enable consumption
    of core service
  • Enhancing services can be added to core service
    to increase value
  • Service bundle set of core services

Baida, Z. (2006). Software-aided Service Bundling
- Intelligent Methods Tools for Graphical
Service Modeling. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006
7
(No Transcript)
8
Service marketing risks
  • Three types of risk (Benaroch, 2002)
  • Firm-specific risks ability of investing
    business to realize the investment
  • Competition risks less payoff due to competition
  • Market risks less payoff due to lack of demand

Benaroch, M. (2002). Managing Information
Technology Investment Risk A Real Options
Perspective. J. Mngt. IS, 19(2)43-84.
9
IT options
  • Managerial flexibility in IT according to Benaroch

Defer
Stage (Stop-resume)
Explore (Pilot/ Prototype)
Scale up/down
Abandon (switch usage)
Compound
Ability to have these choices in the investment
are the real options
10
Service options
11
The question
How to quantify the value of these options?
12
A mobile phone service bundle
  • Bundle components
  • Connectivity (voiceSMS, SMS 0.17 per message)
  • Optional SMS package 25 messages for 3 ( 0.12
    per message)
  • What to do? Take optional SMS package or not?

13
What is the value (provider persp.)?
SMS costs without bundle
valueBun(SMS)

3 - 0.17SMS, if SMS lt 25 - 1.25, if SMS 25
SMS costs with bundle
3
valueBun (SMS costs with bundle)
(SMS costs without bundle)
1.25
0
SMS
18
25
E(valueBun)S(P(SMSi)valueBun(i))
-3
expected value
probability distribution
14
A put option
unprotected position
  • Put option
  • Right to sell (put) stock at price S at some
    point in the future


protected position
S
price paid for option
0
S

(protected position) (unprotected position)
put value
15
Options valuation (European)
  • Black-Scholes formula input
  • Current stock price S
  • Std. dev. s of the above ( volatility)
  • Strike price K
  • Risk-free interest rate r
  • Remaining time until expiration T
  • Output price of European call C ( premium)

16
Black-Scholes formula
where
17
Service options
18
Koens example, revisited
  • Service is designed such that two options are
    created
  • Growth option picture service
  • Scale-up option
  • Original business case -14.5
  • With options -14.516.512.6 14.6

19
Discussion
  • Fundamental validity of the options metaphor (the
    liquidity issue)
  • Were designing a service ( future-oriented).
    But volatility needs historical data!
  • We need very complex maths
  • Are decision makers willing to trust that?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)