Nutrient Balances in Farming Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Nutrient Balances in Farming Systems

Description:

... area; balance more -ve cf perennials [land disturbance, low input use and ... level; mining; mining in annuals perennial; erosion and crop removal main culprits ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: SIN62
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nutrient Balances in Farming Systems


1
Nutrient Balances in Farming Systems
  • Henry Ssali
  • Kawanda, National agricultural Research
    Organisation NARO

2
Uganda Soils
  • Most are old/Highly weathered with little mineral
    nutrient reserves
  • Rely on Soil organic matter SOM for nutrients
    and good physical properties
  • SOM still the best indicator of soil fertility

3
SOIL MANAGEMENT
  • SOM nutrients decrease during cropping phase
  • Inputs org and inorg during cropping phase help
    maintain SOM/nutrients at higher levels
  • With grass/improved fallows, nutrients in the
    topsoil are replenished recycling, BNF,
    depositions, transfer

4
  • Soil analysis gives you the nutrient status of a
    plot at one given time
  • In addition, need to know the nutrient stocks and
    what is happening to them relative to various
    activities/operations on a plot the entire farm

5
FARM COMPONENTS
  • Farm usually has a number components/units
  • Crops annual, perennial, high value etc
  • Livestock
  • Pastures
  • Household including surrounding plots
  • Others

6
Nutrient flows/balances
  • Since soil productivity is dynamic, understanding
    flows and balances within a component and across
    components helps indicate
  • Extent of nutrient accumulation/depletion
    mining
  • Identify the major nutrient flows and
  • What is likely to happen in future
    sustainabilityat plot, farm, district, system,
    region or national level

7
FLOWS
  • INcps flows to CPS from outside the farm
  • OUTcps flows out of CPS and the farm
  • INaps flows to APS from outside the farm
  • OUTaps flow out of APS and the farm
  • INhhs flows to HHS from outside the farm
  • OUThhs flows out of HHS and the farm
  • INTflows flows between components on farm

8
Nutrient inputs
  • IN 1 mineral fertilizers
  • IN 2 organic inputs
  • IN 3 atm deposition rain, dust
  • IN 4 BNF symbiotic non-symbio
  • IN 5 Sedimentation flooding/irrig
  • IN 6 subsoil exploitation trees, etc

9
Nutrient outputs
  • OUT 1 harvest leaving farm cps, aps, etc
  • OUT 2 crop residues/manure leaving farm
  • OUT 3 leaching below root zone
  • OUT 4 gaseous losses den, volat, burn
  • OUT 5 runoff and erosion
  • OUT 6 consption ending in deep latrines

10
Nutrient flows/balances in Uganda
  • The 1st was based on yield and input records
    coupled with generalized estimates of erosion
    and other processes as part of a SSA study
    Stoorvogel Smaling 1990
  • Others have been more localised e.g. Pallisa,
    Mpigi, Iganga Kamuli (Wortmann Kaizzi,1998)
    Mayuge (Esilaba et al 2002)

11
Generalized
  Balance kg/ha/yr Balance kg/ha/yr Balance kg/ha/yr
Land class N P K
Good rainfall 1100, 58 -32 -5 -30
Uncertain rainfall 800, 11 -17 -3 -13
Problem area 1400, 27 -32 -3 -13

Country -29 -4 -27
Stoorvogel and Smaling, 1990
12
Farming systems
  Balance kg/ha/yr Balance kg/ha/yr Balance kg/ha/yr
Area N P K
Pallisa Teso extn -21 -8 -43
L. Victoria Banana-coffee -31 -4 -39
Wortmann and Kaizzi, 1990
13
Balances and LUTs
  • Balances generally ve INs BNFgt Dep, OUTs
    erosgt harvestsgt leaching
  • Annual crops largest area balance more -ve cf
    perennials land disturbance, low input use and
    poor soil cover, K problem for sold bananas w/o
    mulch,
  • -ve balances increase with yields and access to
    markets
  • Since yields are still low, LEISA land
    husbandry, FYM, lcc, residue mangmt, etc can
    reduce/maintain balances to near zero

14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Who mines most?
  Balance kg/ha/yr Balance kg/ha/yr Balance kg/ha/yr
Farmer Class Mayuge N P K
Good managers--farm level -36 -4 -66
Good managers--CPS -57 -9 -98

Poor managers--farm level -7 1 -10
Poor managers--CPS -23 -3 -27
Esilaba et al., 2002
18
Policies for land management subsequent pgms
  • Collected data from randomly selected HH
  • Provided an opportunity to understand
  • how farmers are managing their farms in the
    different AEZs
  • What the nutrient balances are over most of the
    country
  • Sustainability implications as farmers
    increasingly produce for the market

19
Status 1
  • Over 1300 plots with sufficient soils and
    socioeconomic data to estimate flows and balances
  • Have made initial runs and are currently
    examining data/assumptions/protocols for errors

20
Status 2
  • When this is complete will run data for the
    country plot , farm level
  • Data can be linked to other spatial information
    collected AEZs, development domains, production
    zones, etc
  • Early/rough indications
  • farming in Ug is characterized by nutrient mining
    at the plot level mining mining in annuals gt
    perennial erosion and crop removal main
    culprits
  • Nutrient stocks vary with LUTs AEZs

21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com