Title: Modelling complex migration
1- Modelling complex migration
- Michael Bode
2Migration in metapopulations
- Metapopulation dynamics are defined by the
balance between local extinction and
recolonisation.
3Overview
- Metapopulation migration needs to be modelled as
a complex and heterogeneous process. - 2. We can understand metapopulation dynamics by
direct analysis of the migration structure using
network theory.
4Different migration models
- Time invariant models.
- Well-mixed migration.
- Distance-based migration.
- Complex migration.
5Time invariant models
- Re-colonisation probability is constant
- Probability of metapopulation extinction is
underestimated.
6Well-mixed migration (the LPER assumption)
- All patches are equally connected.
- The resulting metapopulation is very homogeneous
7Distance-based migration(The spatially real
metapopulation)
- Migration strengths are defined by inter-patch
distance. - The result is symmetric migration,
- where every patch is connected.
8Will complex migration patterns really affect
metapopulation persistence?
- Both metapopulation (a) and (b) have the
- same total migration
- same number of migration pathways
- Only the migration pattern is different
Pr(Extinction)
Amount of migration
9Complex migration
- 1. Metapopulations can be considered networks
- We can directly analyse the structure of the
metapopulations to determine their dynamics - Using these methods we can rapidly analyse very
large metapopulations
10Network metrics
- How can we characterise a migration pattern?
- Clustered/Isolated?
- Asymmetry?
11Determining the importance of network metrics
Construct a complex migration pattern
Calculate the network metrics
Use Markov transition metrics to determine the
probability of metapopulation persistence
Do the metrics predict metapopulation dynamics?
12Predicting metapopulation extinction probability
- Average Path Length ( )
- Asymmetry of the metapopulation migration (Z)
- (Where M is the migration matrix)
13Predicting metapopulation extinction probability
14Predicting incidence using patch centrality
0.4
0.8
0.4
0.3
15Predicting patch incidence using Centrality
Bars indicate 95 CI
16Implications patch removal
Probability of remaining metapopulation extinction
Single patch removed
High
Low
Centrality of patch removed
17Implications sequential patch removal
Average strategy
Unperturbed metapopulation
Probability of remaining metapopulation extinction
Single strategy
Removal by Centrality
3
2
4
1
Number of patches removed
18Limitations and extensions
- Lack of logical framework.
- Incorporating differing patch sizes.
- Modelling abundances.
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21Simulating metapopulation migration patterns
Regular Lattice
Complex network
22(No Transcript)