Title: Stock market performance and pension fund investment policy: Rebalancing, free float, or market timi
1Stock market performance and pension fund
investment policy Rebalancing, free float, or
market timing?
- NEW PERSPECTIVES ON INSTITUTIONAL INVESTING
- ICPM Discussion Forum June 2008
- Dirk Broeders
- De Nederlandsche Bank
- Joint work with Jacob Bikker and Jan de Dreu
2Overview presentation
- Introduction
- Data
- Results
- Conclusions
3I. Introduction
- Strategic Asset Allocation is based upon ALM
studies using - Long-term expected returns
- Return (co)variances of broad asset classes and
liabilities - Actual (or tactical) asset allocation is based
upon - Short term return expectations
- Maximum tracking error
- We observe large short-term variation in actual
and strategic equity allocation due to relative
stock market performance - Paper studies interaction between stock market
performance and equity allocation
4Potential return from market timing
- Fundamental law of active management
- If investor makes quarterly decisions breadth 4
- To earn 50 basis points excess return per extra
unit of risk (i.c. an information ratio of 0.5)
requires an information coefficient of 0.25 - To achieve an IC of 0.25 one needs to predict the
stock market direction correctly about 63 out of
100 times!
5Stock market performance and equity allocation
6Preview to findings
- Relative stock market performance influences the
asset allocation of pension funds in two ways - In the short term as a result of imperfect
rebalancing - Free floating (passive management)
- Market timing (active management)
- In the medium term as a result of adjustments to
the strategic asset allocation - On average, changes in asset allocations over
time have not generated additional returns
7II. Data
- Dataset contains information on
- Strategic asset allocation
- Asset sales and purchases
- Market value of investments in different asset
classes - Time weighted returns
- Benchmarks indices
- MSCI World index, AEX (stocks)
- JP Morgan EMU (bonds)
- FTSE EPRA Netherlands (real estate)
- 3-month Euribor (money market instruments)
8Data (cont.)
- Period 1999QI 2006QIV (8 years or 32
quarters) - 748 pension funds
- Unbalanced panel
- Source DNB
- Source benchmarks Thomson Financial Datastream
9Summary statistics
10Eye ball test (1) Actual investments
11Eye ball test (2) Strategic investment policy
12III. Results
- We run four different tests
- Short-term impact of stock market performance on
equity allocation - Short-term effect can be subdivided in
rebalancing and free floating - Medium term adjustments to strategic asset
allocation - The contribution of market timing on overall
return
131. Short-term impact of stock market performance
on equity allocation
- We run a model in which the equity weight (wi,t)
for pension fund i at time t is regressed on - Excess return on equities previous quarter (up to
5 lags) - Investment policy
- Pension fund size
14(1) What would we expect?
- Suppose a pension fund invests 40 in equities
- After a 1 excess return on equities the weight
will be
15(1) Stock market returns and equity investments
16(1) Results
- 1 percent relative outperformance of equities to
an increase in equity allocation of 0.16
percentage point in the subsequent quarter - Excess equity returns have a significant impact
on equity allocations up to 5 quarters later - The impact for large pension funds is almost
twice the impact for small funds (0.260/0.144)
172. Short-term effect can be subdivided in
rebalancing and free floating
- The previous result can be subdivided in
- The percentage free floating (or market timing)
and equivalently - The percentage rebalancing
- Also we distinguish between positive and negative
excess returns - Furthermore we analyze differences between small,
medium sized and large pension funds
18(2) Stock market returns and rebalancing
19(2) Results
- Pension funds rebalance 39 percent of excess
equity returns free float is around 61 percent - 61 percent of excess returns increases the equity
allocation in next quarter - Rebalancing is asymmetric
- Only 12 percent of positive equity returns are
rebalanced - While 49 percent of negative equity returns are
rebalanced - Large pension funds tend to overshoot
- In a booming stock market they increase their
equity allocation even more then full free
floating
20(2) Difference between positive and negative
equity market shock
213. Medium term adjustments to strategic asset
allocation
- We run a model in which the strategic equity
weight for pension fund i at time t is regressed
on - Excess return on equities previous year
- Investment policy
- Pension fund size
22(3) Stock market returns and strategic equity
allocation
23(3) Results
- 1 percent relative outperformance of the MSCI in
the past year leads to an increase in strategic
equity allocation of 0.01 percentage point in the
next quarter - Strategic equity allocation is higher for large
pension funds
244. The contribution of market timing on overall
return
- The contribution of market timing to overall
return is subdivided in three components - Excess return from varying the strategic asset
allocation over time - Excess return from varying the actual asset
allocation over time - Excess return from deviating the actual from the
strategic asset allocation
25(4) Results
- The variation of actual and strategic equity
allocation does not generate extra returns - The average loss is 24 basis points per annum for
the strategic asset allocation - The average loss is 20 basis points per annum for
the actual asset allocation - Pension funds have gained 5 basis points per
annum from the difference between actual and
strategic asset allocation
26IV. Conclusions
- Pension fund asset allocation is significantly
driven by short term stock market performance - Pension funds do not automatically sell equities
in rising markets but are more willing to buy
equities after stock market corrections - Overall market timing does not add value