Stock market performance and pension fund investment policy: Rebalancing, free float, or market timi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Stock market performance and pension fund investment policy: Rebalancing, free float, or market timi

Description:

Stock market performance and. pension fund investment policy: Rebalancing, free float, or market ... JP Morgan EMU (bonds) FTSE EPRA Netherlands (real estate) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: dir118
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Stock market performance and pension fund investment policy: Rebalancing, free float, or market timi


1
Stock market performance and pension fund
investment policy Rebalancing, free float, or
market timing?
  • NEW PERSPECTIVES ON INSTITUTIONAL INVESTING
  • ICPM Discussion Forum June 2008
  • Dirk Broeders
  • De Nederlandsche Bank
  • Joint work with Jacob Bikker and Jan de Dreu

2
Overview presentation
  • Introduction
  • Data
  • Results
  • Conclusions

3
I. Introduction
  • Strategic Asset Allocation is based upon ALM
    studies using
  • Long-term expected returns
  • Return (co)variances of broad asset classes and
    liabilities
  • Actual (or tactical) asset allocation is based
    upon
  • Short term return expectations
  • Maximum tracking error
  • We observe large short-term variation in actual
    and strategic equity allocation due to relative
    stock market performance
  • Paper studies interaction between stock market
    performance and equity allocation

4
Potential return from market timing
  • Fundamental law of active management
  • If investor makes quarterly decisions breadth 4
  • To earn 50 basis points excess return per extra
    unit of risk (i.c. an information ratio of 0.5)
    requires an information coefficient of 0.25
  • To achieve an IC of 0.25 one needs to predict the
    stock market direction correctly about 63 out of
    100 times!

5
Stock market performance and equity allocation
6
Preview to findings
  • Relative stock market performance influences the
    asset allocation of pension funds in two ways
  • In the short term as a result of imperfect
    rebalancing
  • Free floating (passive management)
  • Market timing (active management)
  • In the medium term as a result of adjustments to
    the strategic asset allocation
  • On average, changes in asset allocations over
    time have not generated additional returns

7
II. Data
  • Dataset contains information on
  • Strategic asset allocation
  • Asset sales and purchases
  • Market value of investments in different asset
    classes
  • Time weighted returns
  • Benchmarks indices
  • MSCI World index, AEX (stocks)
  • JP Morgan EMU (bonds)
  • FTSE EPRA Netherlands (real estate)
  • 3-month Euribor (money market instruments)

8
Data (cont.)
  • Period 1999QI 2006QIV (8 years or 32
    quarters)
  • 748 pension funds
  • Unbalanced panel
  • Source DNB
  • Source benchmarks Thomson Financial Datastream

9
Summary statistics
10
Eye ball test (1) Actual investments
11
Eye ball test (2) Strategic investment policy
12
III. Results
  • We run four different tests
  • Short-term impact of stock market performance on
    equity allocation
  • Short-term effect can be subdivided in
    rebalancing and free floating
  • Medium term adjustments to strategic asset
    allocation
  • The contribution of market timing on overall
    return

13
1. Short-term impact of stock market performance
on equity allocation
  • We run a model in which the equity weight (wi,t)
    for pension fund i at time t is regressed on
  • Excess return on equities previous quarter (up to
    5 lags)
  • Investment policy
  • Pension fund size

14
(1) What would we expect?
  • Suppose a pension fund invests 40 in equities
  • After a 1 excess return on equities the weight
    will be

15
(1) Stock market returns and equity investments
16
(1) Results
  • 1 percent relative outperformance of equities to
    an increase in equity allocation of 0.16
    percentage point in the subsequent quarter
  • Excess equity returns have a significant impact
    on equity allocations up to 5 quarters later
  • The impact for large pension funds is almost
    twice the impact for small funds (0.260/0.144)

17
2. Short-term effect can be subdivided in
rebalancing and free floating
  • The previous result can be subdivided in
  • The percentage free floating (or market timing)
    and equivalently
  • The percentage rebalancing
  • Also we distinguish between positive and negative
    excess returns
  • Furthermore we analyze differences between small,
    medium sized and large pension funds

18
(2) Stock market returns and rebalancing
19
(2) Results
  • Pension funds rebalance 39 percent of excess
    equity returns free float is around 61 percent
  • 61 percent of excess returns increases the equity
    allocation in next quarter
  • Rebalancing is asymmetric
  • Only 12 percent of positive equity returns are
    rebalanced
  • While 49 percent of negative equity returns are
    rebalanced
  • Large pension funds tend to overshoot
  • In a booming stock market they increase their
    equity allocation even more then full free
    floating

20
(2) Difference between positive and negative
equity market shock
21
3. Medium term adjustments to strategic asset
allocation
  • We run a model in which the strategic equity
    weight for pension fund i at time t is regressed
    on
  • Excess return on equities previous year
  • Investment policy
  • Pension fund size

22
(3) Stock market returns and strategic equity
allocation
23
(3) Results
  • 1 percent relative outperformance of the MSCI in
    the past year leads to an increase in strategic
    equity allocation of 0.01 percentage point in the
    next quarter
  • Strategic equity allocation is higher for large
    pension funds

24
4. The contribution of market timing on overall
return
  • The contribution of market timing to overall
    return is subdivided in three components
  • Excess return from varying the strategic asset
    allocation over time
  • Excess return from varying the actual asset
    allocation over time
  • Excess return from deviating the actual from the
    strategic asset allocation

25
(4) Results
  • The variation of actual and strategic equity
    allocation does not generate extra returns
  • The average loss is 24 basis points per annum for
    the strategic asset allocation
  • The average loss is 20 basis points per annum for
    the actual asset allocation
  • Pension funds have gained 5 basis points per
    annum from the difference between actual and
    strategic asset allocation

26
IV. Conclusions
  • Pension fund asset allocation is significantly
    driven by short term stock market performance
  • Pension funds do not automatically sell equities
    in rising markets but are more willing to buy
    equities after stock market corrections
  • Overall market timing does not add value
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com