Comparative Federalism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Comparative Federalism

Description:

Interstate Commerce Clause (Article I, section 8, paragraph 3) Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) & Trust-busting. FDR, the New Deal, and the Court-Packing Plan ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: christo68
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparative Federalism


1
Comparative Federalism
  • Reasons for Federalism
  • An additional check on power (Madison)
  • Policy flexibility local concerns
  • Policy experimentation

2
Comparative Federalism
  • Federalism in the United States
  • Constitutional design points to a loose
    federation, but the federal government now
    dominates
  • Constitutional Basis
  • Senate
  • Equal representation by state
  • Previously elected by state governments
  • Amendment X The powers not delegated to the
    United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited
    by it to the states, are reserved to the states
    respectively, or to the people.

3
Comparative Federalism
  • Federalism in the United States
  • Events
  • Rejection of Articles of Confederation
  • Civil War decisive rejection of states right to
    secede
  • World Wars, the Great Depression the New Deal

4
Comparative Federalism
  • Federalism in the United States
  • Judicial Interpretation
  • Interstate Commerce Clause (Article I, section 8,
    paragraph 3)
  • Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) Trust-busting
  • FDR, the New Deal, and the Court-Packing Plan
  • Civil Rights Cases erosion of states rights
  • Party Organization and the Party System
  • Parties provide an integrated career ladder for
    politicians

5
Comparative Federalism
  • Federalism in Australia
  • Constitution suggests weak federal government,
    but opposite is true
  • Constitutional Basis
  • Consciously modelled on US
  • Elected Senate 12 Senators per state
  • Constitution lists a small set of exclusive
    Commonwealth powers (interstate commerce,
    taxation), with all else left to states
  • States limited in capacity to tax, e.g., state
    sales tax prohibited

6
Comparative Federalism
  • Federalism in Australia
  • Judicial Interpretation
  • Courts protected Commonwealths near-monopoly on
    revenue, taxation
  • Centralization in Australia flows mainly from
    Canberras capacity to use its financial capacity
    to involve itself in state policy areas (e.g.,
    education)

7
Comparative Federalism
  • Federalism in Australia
  • No major social cleavages
  • Less hostility to Canberras involvement in state
    policy areas
  • Early dominance of Labor Party
  • strongly centralist in organization and outlook
  • Career ladder for politicians

8
Comparative Federalism
  • Federalism Essay
  • DISCUSS HOW CANADIAN FEDERALISM HAS CHANGED
    SINCE CONFEDERATION THROUGH JUDICIAL
    INTERPRETATION, POLITICAL PRACTICE, AND
    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. DUE 10 MARCH 2008
  • Do not try to cover all elements comprehensively
  • Suggest which factor most important
  • Provide reasons why that factor more important
    than other(s)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com