Maria%20Gabriella%20Catanesi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Maria%20Gabriella%20Catanesi

Description:

Harp. Inaugurates a new era in Hadron Production for Neutrino Physics: ... About the discrepancy between the HARP results and those produced by the so called ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: NIC8169
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Maria%20Gabriella%20Catanesi


1
Production StudiesHARP results NA61 prospects
  • Maria Gabriella Catanesi
  • INFN Bari Italy

2
Outline
  • Present measurements Harp results
  • K2K MiniBoone fluxes
  • Super Beams Neutrino Factory Design
  • Atmospheric fluxes ( lt 15 GeV)
  • Hadron Production Models
  • Coming soon
  • Na61 Atmospheric (lt 200 GeV) T2K neutrino
    Flux

3
Harp
  • Inaugurates a new era in Hadron Production for
    Neutrino Physics
  • Based on a design born for Heavy Ions physics
    studies
  • Full acceptance with P.Id.
  • High event rate capability (3KHz on TPC)
  • Built on purpose
  • Collaboration includes members of Neutrino
    Oscillation Cosmic rays experiments
  • (124 Physicists from 20 institutions)
  • And makes measurements on specific targets of
    existing neutrino beams.

4
Existing measurements at the end of the millenium
Boxes show importance of phase space region for
contained atmospheric neutrino events.
Barton et. al.
Overall quoted errors Absolute rates
15 Ratios 5 These figures are typical of
this kind of detector setup
Abbott et. al.
Measurements. 1-2 pT points 3-5 pT
points gt5 pT points
Eichten et. al.
5
HARP Data taking summary
HARP took data at the CERN PS T9 beamline in
2001-2002 Total 420 M events, 300 settings
SOLID
CRYOGENIC
n EXP
K2K Al MiniBoone Be LSND H2O
5 50 100 Replica 5 50 100 Replica 10 100
12.9 GeV/c 8.9 GeV/c 1.5 GeV/c
6
  • Forward Spectrometer
  • 30 mrad lt ? lt 210 mrad.
  • 750 MeV/c lt p lt 6.5 GeV/c
  • K2K,MiniBoone, Cosmic rays

Detector layout
Forward spectrometer
Large Angle spectrometer
  • Large Angle Spectrometer
  • 0.35 rad lt ? lt 2.15 rad
  • 100 MeV/c lt p lt 700 MeV/c
  • Super Beams - Nufactories

More details in the NIM paper The Harp Detector
_at_ the CERN PS
7
FORWARD ANALYSIS
8
FW Momentum Resolution
ELASTICS
TOF
BEAM
open data filled MC
9
FW PID principle
10
Relevance of HARP for K2K neutrino beam
One of the largest K2K systematic errors comes
from the uncertainty of the far/near ratio
pions producing neutrinos in the oscillation peak
measured by HARP
oscillation peak
K2K far/near ratio
En (GeV)
K2K interest
Beam MC confirmed by Pion Monitor
Beam MC
11
Far/Near Ratio in K2K
Predicted Flux Shape
Predicted Far/Near Ratio
Near Detector
Far Detector
  • HARP gives factor 2 error reduction across all
    energies

Nucl.Phys.B7321-45,2006 hep-ex/0510039
12
MiniBoone Harp Be 8.9 GeV 5 ?
p
Harp Forward Spectrometer Acceptance
(But also SCIBOONE)
13
HARP Be 8.9 GeV/c data Sanford-Wang
parametrization
14
  • More HARP data for accurate flux predictions
    coming

main source of ?e flux for MiniBooNE
K production data thick targets p -
production data
Direct measurement with rescattering and
absorption
Anti-neutrino flux measurement
p
K
p
15
?- data needed for MiniBooNE antineutrino flux
Paper in preparation
16
Large Angle Analysis
17
LA Spectrometer performance
p-p PID with dE/dx
momentum calibration cosmic rays elastic
scattering
momentum resolution
PID dE/dx used for analysis TOF used to
determine efficiency
p-e PID with dE/dx
elastic scattering absolute calibration of
efficiency momentum angle (two spectrometers!)
18
The elastic scattering benchmark
momentum scale
1/p (predicted-measured)/(1/p)
Comparison of predicted vs measured track
allows LA tracking benchmark
missing mass peak from large angle proton
track (position of peak verifies momentum scale
-- 15 shift is completely excluded)
efficiency
Momentum scale Sys. Error lt 3
19
Stability from LH2 target to other targets
consider average momentum of protons with dE/dx
?7-8 MIPs
H2 setting
H2
Al 13 12 8 5 3
Carbon 12 8 5 3
Tin 12 8 5 3
?2
Copper 12 8 5 3
Lead 12 8 5 3
Be 12 9 8 5 3
Ta 12 8 5 3
20
Neutrinofactorystudy

-
Ta Target Data

-
yield/Ekin
ds/dq cross-sections can be fed into neutrino
factory studiesto find optimum design The
optimal energy is between 5 and 8 GeV/c
published on EPJC
21
Neutrino factorystudy (cont)
its also possible to enlarge the phase space (if
we accept larger errors)
On going analysis
22
p-p ratios for light and heavy nuclei
23
Pion yields
comparison of p and p- and yields for p-A for
Be, C, Cu, Sn, Ta and Pb
forward production only 0.35 lt q lt 0.95 rad
p
p-
24
Pion yields
A-dependence of p and p- and yields for p-A for
Be, C, Cu, Sn, Ta and Pb (3, 5, 8, 12 GeV/c)
forward production only 0.35 lt q lt 1.55 rad
p
p-
25
proton beams on long targets
  • Data analysed on tantalum and carbon targets
    (lead later)
  • Especially useful for the neutrino factory target
  • Interesting to tune models for re-interactions
    (and shower calculations in calorimeters etc.)
  • As for the thin targets, corrections for the
    absorption and re-interaction of the produced
    particles are made
  • NO correction is made for the absorption and
    re-interaction of the beam proton (this is what
    we want to measure)
  • Data are not directly applicable our targets are
    30mm in diameter more re-interactions of the
    scattered proton

26
100 vs 5 TARGET
FW and BW p-C p
100 l target
5 l target
PRELIMINARY
27
100 / 5 TARGET
bin-by-bin ratio 5 GeV/c beam p-C p/-
Large corrections !
If no effect from absorption of p expect ratio
1 If all interacting p are lost expect ratio
0.65
p-
p
PRELIMINARY
28
100 / 5 TARGET
bin-by-bin ratio 12 GeV/c beam p-C p/-
If no effect from absorption of p expect ratio
1 If all interacting p are lost expect ratio
0.65
p
p-
29
100 / 5 TARGET
bin-by-bin ratio 5 GeV/c beam p-Ta p/-
If no effect from absorption of p expect ratio
1 If all interacting p are lost expect ratio
0.65
p
p-
30
100 / 5 TARGET
bin-by-bin ratio 12 GeV/c beam p-Ta p/-
If no effect from absorption of p expect ratio
1 If all interacting p are lost expect ratio
0.65
p-
p
31
HARP publications
Forward analysis Measurement of the production
cross-section of positive pions in p-Al
collisions at 12.9 GeV/c (K2K target
measurement) M.G. Catanesi et al, hep-ex/0510039,
Nucl. Phys. B732 1-45 (2006) Measurement of the
production cross-section of positive pions in the
collision of 8.9 GeV/c protons on beryllium
(MiniBooNE target measurement) M.G. Catanesi et
al, Eur.Phys.J.C5229-53,2007. Measurement of
the production cross-section of pi in p-C and
pi- C Interactions at 12 GeV/c M.G.Catanesi et al
Astroparticle Physics - volume/issue 29/4 pp.
257-281 Forward production of pi/pi- in p-O2
and pN2 interactions at 12 GeV/C M.G.Catanesi et
al Astroparticle Physics - volume/issue 30/4
pp. 120-150 Forward production of charged pions
in the HARP experiment with incident pi/pi- on
nuclear targets M.G.Catanesi et al Accepted by
Nuclear physics A In preparation Full
characterization of the MiniBoone/SciBoone 
neutrino beam(pi-, kaon, protons, thick and
replica target)Forward production of charged
pions with incident protonson different nuclear
targetsForward production of charged pions with
incident protons and pionson different nuclear
thick targets
32
HARP publications
Large Angle analysis (Neutrino Factory
measurements) Measurement of the production of
charged pions by protons on a tantalum
target M.G. Catanesi et al, Eur. Phys. J. C51
(2007) 787 Large-angle production of charged
pions by 3 GeV/c12 GeV/c protons on carbon
copper and tin targets M.G. Catanesi et al, Eur.
Phys. J. C53177-204,2008 Large-angle production
of charged pions by 3 GeV/c12 GeV/c protons on a
beryllium , aluminum and lead targets M.G.
Catanesi et al, Eur. Phys. J. C5437-60,2008 Larg
e-angle production of charged pions in the HARP
experiment with incident protons on nuclear
targets M.G.Catanesi et al. Phys. Rev. C 77,
055207 (2008) In preparation Large-angle
production of charged pions in the HARP
experiment with incident pions on nuclear targets
M.G. Catanesi et al. (Draft in preparation )
(beams 3 GeV/c -12.9 GeV/c , Al, Be,C, Cu,
Pb,Sn,Ta targets) Large Angle production of
charged pions with incident protons and pionson
different nuclear thick targets
33
What next
34
  • NA61 Plans
  • perform a comprehensive scan in energy and size
    of colliding nuclei to study the properties of
    the transition between hadron gas and quark gluon
    plasma
  • measure hadron production in hadron-nucleus
    interactions needed for neutrino and
    astroparticle physics

NA61 approved in 2007 Technical Run end -2007 T2K
target run 2008
35
HADRON PRODUCTION FOR T2Kat NA61/SHINE
36
T2K experiment
  • Physics goals
  • Discovery of?????e appearance
  • Precise meas. of disappearance?????x
  • Neutral current events
  • Discovery of CP violation (Phase2)

37
T2K n beam
  1. predict nm flux at far detector
  2. estimate ne background

far-to-near flux ratio (T2K beam MC prediction)
  • Near and far detectors see different solid
    angles
  • far detector point like source at 2o
  • near detector extended source 1o to 3o
  • (wide off axis angular range)
  • complicated far to near flux ratio

far peak shifted to higher energy (angular acc.)
extended source for near detector
  • T2K F/N ratio should be know with a precision lt
    3 to match the physic requirements (20 without
    dedicated measurements )

NA61 is needed !
38
T2K ? parent hadron phase space
p
K
angle (mrad)
angle (mrad)
momentum (GeV)
momentum (GeV)
need to cover all this kinematical region and
identify the outgoing hadrons K component
important for ne appearance signal
(background) requires large acceptance and
particle ID
Region of interest for pions ( 0.5lt P lt5 GeV/c
and 0 lt? lt 250 mrad)
Region of interest for Kaons ( 1lt P lt10 GeV/c
and 0 lt? lt 350 mrad)
39
Why hadron measurements for T2K?
  • phase-space of T2K ? beam
  • no data at these energies 30 50 GeV,
  • in particular for large production angles
  • (?gt 100 mrad)
  • extrapolations possible but not too reliable
  • reinteractions / absorption of few GeV
  • pions poorly described
  • (up to factors of 2)
  • prefer to base ? beam description on actual
    measurements
  • rather than more or less reliable hadron
    interaction models

Without the NA61 data T2K will not reach the
required sensitivity
40
(No Transcript)
41
-calibration of all detector components have been
performed successfully-preliminary uncorrected
spectra have been obtained, -high quality of
track reconstruction and particle identification
(similar to NA49) has been achieved, -a
preliminary result on the total inelastic pC
cross sectionat 31 GeV/c was obtained,
42
(No Transcript)
43
Conclusions(1)
  • HARP has made important contributions to hadronic
    cross-section measurements relevant to neutrino
    experiments
  • Aluminium results for K2K have used for final K2K
    publication.
  • Beryllium results for MiniBooNE and SciBoone are
    also finals. These measurements are already being
    used by the MiniBooNE collaboration.
  • Tantalum (and other targets results) for the
    Neutrino Factory studies are available
  • Carbon ,N2, O2 data for atmospheric neutrino
    fluxes are ready.
  • More production cross-section measurements are
    finished and can be used to tune hadron
    production models.
  • All the previous listed results have been already
    published but many new results will be coming
    soon stay tuned !

44
Conclusions (2)
  • The NA61 experiment was approved at CERN in June
    2007
  • -the pilot run was performed during October 2007
  • -calibration of all detector components have been
    performed successfully
  • a preliminary result on the total inelastic pC
    cross section at 31 GeV/c was obtained, -
  • the data and detailed simulations confirm that
    the phase-space needed for the T2K measurements
    is covered,-
  • first physics results from the 2007 run are
    expected in 2009

45
backup
46
Example of future projects
47
About the discrepancy between the HARP results
and those produced by the so called Dydak group
Protons on Be
48
Protons on Be
49
About the discrepancy between the HARP results
and those produced by the so called Dydak group
Protons on Be
50
In Summary
  • The Dydak group claims that the observed
    discrepancies should be interpreted as the
    consequence of a momentum bias (15) in our data
  • We dont believe in this hypothesis because
  • This bias is excluded by the elastic scattering
    analysis
  • The discrepancy is visible only for p
  • The discrepancy is visible only at low ?
  • The size of the discrepancy smootly depends
    from the beam energy
  • No shift is observed in the peak position

Any way the size of the effect is such that
doesnt change the optimal energy for the NF
driver
51
Harp vs E910 (12 GeV/c P beam)
52
Atmospheric neutrino fluxes motivations for
measurements
TOTEM 14 TEV
NA61/MIPP 40-200 GeV
  • Initial reaction well above the highest energy
    accelerator available.
  • Shower develops a large number of lower energy
    interactions accelerator measurements are
    helpful.
  • Energy region from few GeV
  • ? 200 GeV (contained)
  • ? 2 TeV (through going)

HARP 2-15 GeV
  • Accelerator measurements are very sparse.
  • - Colliders most particles close to beam and
    dont enter the detector.
  • - Fixed target The energies are much lower and
    few experiments have published.
  • - No data available on O2 N2

53
Results for pO2 or pN2 cryo targets

54
LONG C TARGET
p-C p-
PRELIMINARY
forward 0.35 lt q lt 1.55
backward 1.55 lt q lt 2.15
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com