Marriage in MultiEthnic society, Netherlands Demographic Society Annual Conference, Het Trippenhuis, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Marriage in MultiEthnic society, Netherlands Demographic Society Annual Conference, Het Trippenhuis,

Description:

cohabitation and extramarital births rare. households often complex. ... cohabitation and extra-marital births unusual. Households usually nuclear-based. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: davidc171
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Marriage in MultiEthnic society, Netherlands Demographic Society Annual Conference, Het Trippenhuis,


1
Marriage in Multi-Ethnic society, Netherlands
Demographic Society Annual Conference, Het
Trippenhuis, Amsterdam, 9 October 2003Partner
choice and the growth of ethnic minority
populations
D.A. Coleman Department of Social Policy and
Social Work, University of Oxford http//www.apsoc
.ox.ac.uk/oxpop
2
Not much marriage please - were North Western
Europeans
  • Marriage an odd choice for a 21st century
    conference, in the homeland of the Second
    Demographic Transition?
  • But marriage alive and well and living in (most)
    European ethnic minority populations.
  • Host / immigrant distinctions enshrined in
    Hajnals line apparent since 16th century,
    sharpened in 20th.

3
Basic data on marriage contrasts
  • Most Eastern European and non-European marriage
    universal and early.
    often arranged or consanguineous.
    cohabitation and extramarital births rare.
    households often complex.
  • Most minorities in this group
  • Traditional Western West of Hajnals line
    marriage late,
    often avoided, mostly not arranged. cohabitation
    and extra-marital births unusual. Households
    usually nuclear-based.
  • Data on marriages / unions of ethnic minorities
    very uneven (e.g stock, not flow).

4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
How marriage affects growth of ethnic minority
populations
  • 1. Migration in relation to marriage
    -Family reconstitution
    reestablish family
    -Family formation to create new family or even
    primarily for migration
  • 2. Arranged/endogamous/consanguineous marriage
    vs. free partner choice
    Measures, determines assimilation or minority
    formation. Affects growth through - Fertility
    preferences of imported spouses - Creation
    of new mixed ethnic groups

8
1.Migration in relation to marriage
  • Fundamental reason for growth of foreign / ethnic
    minority populations in Europe post 1960s.
  • Dependent / spouse migration continues to
    dominate migration streams to the West.
  • Direct effect of numbers.
  • Indirect effects of (often) high fertility and
    permanent community formation.
  • Marriage migration replaces reconstitution
    migration from 1980s. May accelerate?

9
(No Transcript)
10
Net immigration to EU15 1960 - 2001 (thousands)
11
Components of immigration flows to Western Europe
(OECD 2003)
12
Spouse migration to the UK 1973 - 2001 (thousands)
13
Spouse migration as gross foreign inflow to UK
1975 - 2001 (two versions)
14
Displacement of family re-constitution migration
by family formation migration UK 1982 - 1995
15
Displacement of family re-unification migration
by family formation migration, Netherlands 1995,
2002
16
Macro / micro factors affecting migration for
family formation
  • Immigrant populations with prescriptive marriage
    patterns (race/caste/religion specific,
    consanguineous).
  • New migration streams with similar prescriptive
    preferences.
  • Weak or strong cultural change.
  • Growth in size of appropriate age-group.
  • Sending country pressures.
  • Receiving country policies.

17
Theoretical expectations in demography of ethnic
minorities
  • Characteristics theory old fashioned FDT
    theory.
  • Minority status theory. Two options -
    fundamentalist defensive structuring or
    accelerated transition for upward mobility.
  • Cultural particularism - new(ish) model FDT
    theory.
  • General assumption of acculturation.

18
Theoretical disappointments
  • Second generation marital choice may be same as /
    even more traditional than first generation
    (Belgian, Dutch Muslims).
  • Not a consistent finding (e.g. Asians in US).
  • This traditional behaviour may serve modern
    ends.
  • Arranged marriage may co-exist with modernisation
    of other demographic areas.

19
Growth of South Asian ethnic minority populations
of marriageable age, GB 1981-01.
20
Modernisation of (some) demographic patterns 1.
TFR trends of ethnic minority populations, Great
Britain LFS own-child)
21
Modernisation of (some) demographic patterns 2.
Age Specific Fertility Rates, Indian women, UK,
1965-2001
22
Reversal of (other) demographic patterns 2. Age
Specific Fertility Rates, Black-African women,
UK, 1965-2001
23
2. Partner choice and the rise of new mixed
ethnic groups.
  • Assortative unions tend to preserve ethnic
    characteristics arranged marriages etc.
  • More random partner choice can create new
    groups of mixed origin.
  • Choice of ethnic identity / ethnic mobility.
  • May increase or diminish group size.
  • Intergenerational transmission of values
    important.

24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Ethnic groups of mixed origin, England and Wales
2001
28
Births of mixed origin by ethnic group of mother,
Great Britain 1992 - 2000 (LFS)
29
Populations of mixed origin, England and Wales
2001
30
Populations of mixed origin, England and Wales
2001
31
Mixed populations by age compared with all
ethnic, numbers and percent.
32
Population of mixed Caribbean origin compared
with all Caribbean origin (numbers and percent),
England and Wales 2001.
33
Fertility of populations of mixed origin (all
combined)
34
Policies on migration and marriage
  • Policies differ on age, status, duration of
    residence, suitability of accommodation.
  • Facilitation of inflows for re-unification and
    new unions (Canada 2002, UK 1997).
  • Anxiety about arranged marriage in UK on social
    grounds.
  • Age-restriction (24) on family re-union (Denmark
    2002).
  • EU enlargement and asylum flows change basis of
    eligible population.

35
Policies on migration for marriage some criteria
  • Citizenship of principal.
  • Possession of employment permit by principal.
  • Minimum age of partners.
  • Legally married or cohabiting.
  • Suitable housing available.
  • No charge on public funds.
  • Duration of time after arrival of principal.
  • Prior official approval for registration.
  • Primary purpose test.
  • Amsterdam Treaty 1999 and EU Directives

36
Conclusions
  • Marital behaviour of ethnic minorities
    -differs between groups,
    -often fails to conform
    to theory -not
    congruent with other demographic change.
  • Union migration biggest open-ended migration
    channel, will define national ethnic composition.
  • Trends in partner choice a major factor in future
    migration flows, and isolation / assimilation of
    ethnic populations.
  • Inter-ethnic marriage may diminish or increase
    group size.

37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com