Dr Anne Marie McGauran and Dr Jeanne Moore NESF Policy Analysts

presentation player overlay
1 / 26
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dr Anne Marie McGauran and Dr Jeanne Moore NESF Policy Analysts


1
Dr Anne Marie McGauran and Dr Jeanne MooreNESF
Policy Analysts
  • Measuring Implementation of Irish Policies

2
Structure of Presentation
  • Aim of Presentation
  • About the NESF
  • Focus on Policy Implementation
  • Current Projects
  • Home Care Packages
  • Child Literacy

Launch of Mental Health and Social Inclusion
Report November 2007
3
Aim of Presentation
  • This seminar will outline the NESFs new work
    focus on implementation of Irish public policy.
  • We hope to discuss methodologies and issues which
    will be important to consider in the NESF work as
    it develops.
  • This is in the context of the NESFs new work
    mandate to focus on policy implementation, to
    gain better information on the factors which lead
    to successful delivery of policies, so that
    quality outcomes can be gained from them.

4
Role of the NESF
5
Membership
6
The NESDO Family
7
Policy Implementation
  • Why the interest in Irish policy implementation?
  • Many strategies and policies have been introduced
    in Ireland in recent decades, but implementation
    can be piecemeal and incremental.

8
Lots of strategy, not so much implementation...
9
History
  • 1970s discovery of the black box i.e. what
    is happening in the black box between policy
    design and policy delivery? (Quinn Patton, 1978)
  • It is crucial to delve into this black box, to
    find out why policy implementation is not
    achieving the results hoped for or if it is,
    then how.
  • Studies have led to various theories on what
    issues affect policy implementation.

10
Top Down and Bottom Up
  • Top-down theories highlight factors which could
    lead to successful implementation such as
  • clear objectives,
  • clear lines of authority,
  • good communication between various groups, and
  • sufficient resources.
  • But... there is also negotiation between those
    directing policy and those implementing it. This
    led to the development of several bottom-up
    theories. These focus on
  • organisational conflict, and
  • Bargaining.

11
Hybrid
  • Hybrid theories
  • combine elements of both the top-down and
    bottom-up theories
  • stress that implementation is constrained by the
    world outside policy making as well as
  • the institutional context in which implementers
    act (so organisational culture and practices very
    important).
  • This leads to an evolution of policy during the
    implementation phase.

12
Current work in Ireland
  • Dept of Taoiseach has commissioned a range of
    studies looking at implementation
  • OECD review of the Irish Public Service,
  • ORP (Organisational Review Process),
  • NESF work.

13
OECD review - key issues for implementation
  • Management
  • project management,
  • co-ordination and networking,
  • leadership.
  • Accountability
  • accountability systems, incentives, sanctions,
  • performance measures.
  • Resources
  • budgeting (allocation prioritisation),
  • staffing (including management, capacity and
    training).
  • Engagement
  • engagement of different groups in delivery,
  • Communication.
  • Innovation and best practice
  • Politics and politicians

14
Organisational Review Process
  • Looking at the capacity of three government
    departments to deliver their goals. Considering
    issues such as strategy management.
  • Due to publish the reviews this Autumn.
  • Both this and the OECD review could be considered
    more top-down in approach.
  • Now, before moving onto the NESF work...

15
How would you measureimplementation?
  • We need you!
  • Take 5 minutes to
  • tell us what you think

16
NESF Projects on implementation
  • Two new NESF projects on implementation
  • Home Care Support Scheme (also known as Home Care
    Packages),
  • Child Literacy and Social Inclusion.
  • We aim to consider both top-down and
    bottom-up issues, using work by Dr Maureen
    Gaffney on organisational culture.

17
Home Care Packages
  • This project examines the Home Care Support
    Scheme as a case-study of policy implementation,
    from the perspective of an outcomes (or
    performance) oriented approach to policy
    formulation and delivery.
  • It will
  • Identify the characteristics of an ideal
    outcomes/performance oriented approach
  • Compare the development and formulation of the
    Home Care Support Scheme to this ideal and
  • Examine on-the-ground delivery of the Scheme to
    see the degree of policy implementation that
    occurred, regional and local variations in this,
    and factors that might explain this.
  • This focus on performance could be considered a
    top-down approach to implementation.

18
A performance approach?
19
Performance/outcomes approach to implementation
  • Performance management is a management cycle
    under which programme performance objectives and
    targets are determined, managers have flexibility
    to achieve them, actual performance is measured
    and reported, and this information feeds into
    decisions about programme funding, design,
    operations and rewards or penalties (Curristine,
    2005131). Involving
  • Good strategy planning
  • Linking performance to budgets
  • Measuring and evaluating performance
  • Good accountability and incentive systems
  • Co-ordination with existing policies practices
  • Taking this ideal template of performance
    management, we will compare it to how the home
    care package scheme has been planned, budgeted
    for, measured, held to account and co-ordinated

20
Why Child Literacy and Social Inclusion?
  • A goal of the review of the National Poverty
    Strategy in 2001 was to halve the proportion of
    pupils presenting with serious reading
    difficulties in schools designated as
    disadvantaged by 2006 (Kennedy, 2007 202).
  • This target has not been met but has been is set
    out again in the National Action Plan for Social
    Inclusion 2007-2016 to reduce the proportion of
    pupils with serious literacy difficulties in
    primary schools serving disadvantaged communities
    from the current 27-30 to less than 15 by
    2016.
  • Twenty years of literacy policies and initiatives
    and there is little improvement.
  • So it is not for the want of policy
    initiatives....

21
Child Literacy and Social Inclusion
  • The overall objective of the project is to
    examine- both from the bottom up and the top
    down- the process of implementation of policies
    that seek to address child literacy and social
    inclusion.
  • The aim is to identify best practice in the
    implementation of child literacy and social
    inclusion policies, as outlined in Delivering
    Equality of Opportunity in Schools (DEIS) and
    elsewhere as well as identify challenges to
    effective implementation in and outside of
    schools, particularly in the home and the local
    community.

22
Child Literacy and Social Inclusion
  • To examine policy design, implementation and the
    context and process of delivery. Focusing, in
    part, on the softer aspects of implementation,
    the non-rational aspects, to do with
    organisational culture (Gaffneys paper).
  • Frames of organisational culture
  • Observable artefacts espoused valued and shared
    tacit assumptions.
  • Coping with Change
  • Creating the motivation to change
  • Learning new concepts and new meanings for old
    concepts
  • Internalising new concepts and meanings.
  • How? Five case studies of schools and community
    projects.

23
Delivery, Context and Process of Implementation
  • How is the policy being translated as it works
    its way down to the ground? Is it being
    implemented in the same way across schools?
  • How is the policy perceived by stakeholders? Is
    there agreement as to the problem? Is there even
    agreement as to what the problem is?
  • How is implementation success and failure
    rewarded and sanctioned?
  • What is the organisational culture in schools and
    how does it shape policy delivery?
  • What are the shared tacit assumptions - about
    people and their motivations, about the
    management process, about the school, the
    Department, about how the work gets done, about
    how success is achieved, about the culture
    itself?

24
Just beginning...
  • We do not have all the answers!
  • We hope we are
  • Throwing a spotlight on the process and context
    of implementation
  • Building methodological skills and knowledge
  • Identifying the factors that contribute to more
    effective policy delivery with quality outcomes

25
Benefits and Drawbacks
  • From what you have heard, what do you think of
    our approach? What are the benefits and
    drawbacks?
  • What other methods and approaches should we
    consider?

26
Contact Details
  • Thank you for your attention!
  • For further information, please contact
  • Dr Jeanne Moore, Dr Anne-Marie McGauran
  • NESF Secretariat
  • www.nesf.ie
  • info_at_nesf.ie
  • 01 814 6361
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com