AP Psychology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

AP Psychology

Description:

Set of principles that organize and predict behaviors or events. Link observed facts ... for breakfast as a child and cancer versus people who ate Frosted Flakes for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:12
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: valued176
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AP Psychology


1
AP Psychology
  • Ms. Simon
  • September 17-24, 2009
  • Introduction to Research Methods

2
Hindsight Bias
  • The tendency to believe, after learning an
    outcome, that one would have foreseen it

3
Scientific Theories
  • Set of principles that organize and predict
    behaviors or events
  • Link observed facts
  • Imply hypotheses that offer testable predictions

4
Subfields of Psychology
  • Basic Psychology- research
  • Applied Psychology- research put into practice as
    therapist
  • Psychiatry- a medical field- deals with mental
    disorders- prescribe medication

5
There are three main types of research methods in
psychology Descriptive Correlational Experi
mental                             
6
Descriptive Study
  • Case Study- psychologists study one individual in
    great depth in hopes of revealing universal
    principles

7
Case Study Pros
  • Detailed information
  • Unusual Cases
  • Inexpensive
  • Few ethical considerations

8
The Problem with the Case Study
  • An individual may be atypical
  • Cannot generalize results
  • Difficult to Manipulate Variables
  • Difficult to quantify data

9
Naturalistic Observation
  • Observe subjects in natural habitats without
    interacting

10
Naturalistic Observation
Pros Cons
Realistic No manipulat-
Inexpensive Ion of variables
Few ethical consideration Observer Bias
11
Survey Method
  • Relies on questions answered by a group of people
    in interviews or questionnaires

12
Survey Method
  • Experimenter must identify the population to
    study
  • Random sampling picking members from a population
    randomly to ensure a representative sample

13
Survey Method
Pros Cons
Can gather lots of data Honest answers?
Few ethical considerations Need many participants
Inexpensive Wording Effects
14
Wording Effects
  • In a study by AMNH, 88 of all respondents said
    that they were interested in plants and trees,
    but only 39 said they were interested in botany.
  • One out of five Americans (22 percent) doubted
    that the Holocaust had occurred. 12 said they
    werent sure

15
What to Watch for
  • Order of choices
  • Is the time frame specified?
  • How personal or direct is the wording?
  • Is there a cultural bias?

16
Correlational Studies
  • Correlational studies assess the association
    between two or more characteristics of interest
    without ascribing causes
  • Is a correlational study an experiment?

17
Correlation coefficient
  • Example R .37

18
Correlational Studies
19
Correlational Studies
Pros Cons
Inexpensive Confounding variables
Few ethical considerations Illusory correlation
Time Does not
Objective I mply causation
20
Illusory Correlation
  • When we believe there is a relationship between
    two things, we are likely to notice and recall
    instances that confirm our belief

21
  • What is the correlation?
  • 1) good looks/popularity
  • 2) self-esteem/depression
  • 3) brain size/intelligence
  • 4) money/happiness
  • 5) Education/length of life

22
Correlation determining causation
  • There is a strong correlation between people
    who ate oatmeal for breakfast as a child and
    cancer versus people who ate Frosted Flakes for
    breakfast as a child

23
Fridays Exam What to Study
  • About 40 Historical Approaches, 60 Research
    Methods
  • Study mostly from Class Discussion!
  • Format Multiple Choice, One short AP exam style
    essay question, short answer and/or matching

24
Research Methods
Descriptive Correlational Experimental
Explains behavior using natural observations assess the association between two or more characteristics of interest Researcher manipulates one variable and observes the effect on another variable
1) Case studies 2) Naturalistic 3) Surveys 1) Causation 2) Illusory correlation 3) Correlational Coefficient Experimental Design Confounding Variables, double-blind
25
Experimental Method
  • Researcher manipulates one variable (independent
    variable) and observes the effect on another
    variable (dependent variable)
  • Allows one to show a causal relationship

26
  • Q How is the experimental group different from
    the control group?
  • A The experimental group receives or reacts to
    the independent variable and the control group
    does not receive the independent variable
  • Q Why is a control group needed?
  • A Provides baseline for comparison

27
  • Confounding variable
  • external differences between the experimental
    group and the control group other than those
  • resulting from
  • the independent
  • variable

28
Confounding Variables
  • 1) Placebo Effect
  • experimental results caused by expectations
    alone

29
Confounding Variables
  • Demand Characteristics- participants form an
    interpretation of the experiment's purpose and
    unconsciously change their behavior accordingly

30
  • How can we control for
  • confounding variables?

31
  • How can we control for
    confounding variables?
  • 1) Random Assignment
  • method of assigning subjects to groups to
    minimize pre-existing differences between those
    groups
  • This is an example of Between subjects
    design Participants in the experimental and
    control group are different individuals

32
  • How can be control for confounding variables?
  • 2) Within subjects design
  • Technique where subjects serve as control and
    experimental group.
  • 3) Twin Studies

33
Confounding Variables
  • Experimenter bias- researchers expectations
    about the outcome of a study influence the
    results
  • Q How can we eliminate experimenter bias?

34
How can we eliminate experimenter bias?
  • Multiple Experimenters
  • 2. Double blind procedure- research design in
    which neither the experimenter or the
    participants know who is in the experimental
    versus control group

35
AP Psychology
  • Ms. Simon
  • September 24, 2009
  • Experimental Statistics

36
Do Now
  • From your reading Why do we need operational
    definitions?

37
How do psychologists present data?
  • Frequency Distributions

38
Statistics
  • Statistical significance (p) is the likelihood
    that the observed difference between groups
    results from a real difference rather than chance
    alone
  • Whats a good p value?

39
When is data statistically significant?
40
1) Large difference between the two means
) Large difference between the two means
41
When is data statistically significant?
42
When is data statistically significant?
  • 2) Small standard deviations

43
But whats a standard deviation?
  • A standard deviation is the degree by which a
    score varies from the mean
  • You dont need to know the equation!

44
(No Transcript)
45
When is data statistically significant?
46
When is data statistically significant?
  • 3) Large Sample Size

47
Mean, Median, Mode
  • 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10, 10, 11, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12,
    13
  • Whats the mode?
  • Whats the median?

48
Normal Distribution
49
Skewed Data
50
Homework
  • Activity design an experiment to see if
    aggression is related to violent TV watching
  • Be sure to address random selection, random
    assignment, experimental versus control group,
    confounding variables, and how you will minimize
    the effects of experimental and observer bias.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com