F. Cerutti, M. Mauri, A. Mereghetti - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

F. Cerutti, M. Mauri, A. Mereghetti

Description:

vertically averaged over the -60cm y 60cm interval (beam axis at y=0) ... Expected high energy hadron fluence in UJ56 (triplet electronics) is worrying ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: liuwgW
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: F. Cerutti, M. Mauri, A. Mereghetti


1
ESTIMATION OF PARTICLE FLUENCES IN ELECTRONICS
LOCATIONS
  • F. Cerutti, M. Mauri, A. Mereghetti
  • for the FLUKA team

2
Overview
  • What, why, how
  • Radiation levels in UJ56 (and UJ57) high energy
    hadrons
  • Available estimates for RR areas
  • Conclusions

3
Rationale
4
Single Event Errors
A dedicated working group
T. Wijnands










Radiation To Electronics Taskforce
(R2E) http//ab-div.web.cern.ch/ab-div/Meetings/r2
e/
as a part of its mandate
establish, extend and evaluate the inventory of
information needed to assess radiation-induced
electronics failures
5
UJ56, UJ57, RR57
Looking at IR5
6
FLUKA model of IR5 (present LHC)
Concrete shielding blocks
Triplet
D1
TAN
IP5
TAS
UJ57
UJ56
courtesy of M. Fuerstner (SC/RP) with
contribution of C. Hoa (AT/MCS)
7
gt20 MeV hadron fluence
for a total luminosity of 100 1015 b-1 y-1
(i.e. LL0 for 107 s/y)
vertically averaged over the -60cm lt ylt 60cm
interval (beam axis at y0)
In UJ56, after a 2m concrete shielding, the high
energy hadron fluence at beam level ranges from
1.3 109 up to 1.3 1010 cm-2 y-1
8
CMS shielding effect?
assuming CMS cavern walls as totally absorbing
in fact high energy hadrons in UJ56 come from
interactions between TAS and D1 (Q2)
9
Upstairs
vertically averaged over the 220cm lt ylt 420cm
interval (beam axis at y0)
Upstairs (sensitive electronics) high energy
hadron fluence is in the range 1.2 - 3.6 109 cm-2
y-1
10
Past calculations for RR areas
11
RR17
70 1015 b-1 y-1
optics version 6.4 (_at_20sx)
1.6 1014 protons y-1
0.21 - 6.3 1010 m-1 y-1
12
RR57
13
IR1
14
Conclusions
  • Expected high energy hadron fluence in UJ56
    (triplet electronics) is worrying for the present
    LHC at nominal luminosity (with ideal shielding
    without holes)
  • Past estimates for the IR1/IR5 RR areas are not
    on the safe side (failure risk related to the
    electronics type). It is worth cross-checking
    them (expected losses at TCLP.4, gas density).
  • No simple luminosity scaling for IRP1 (different
    aperture, longitudinal positions)
  • New dedicated studies to be planned under the
    coordination of the R2E Taskforce
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com