Acquisition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Acquisition

Description:

Research Questions. 1.) Does the use of PECS generalize. to untrained settings? ... 4 children with autism; ages 7 9 years; male; absence of functional communication ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: ls78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Acquisition


1
Acquisition Generalization of PECS Behaviors
in Children With Autism
  • By Laurie S. Hanley
  • Faculty Advisor
  • Dr. Ann Beck

2
Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD)
  • Diagnostic Features
  • Characteristics
  • Incidence
  • Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)

3
Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS)
  • Developed by Andy Bondy and Lori Frost
  • Purpose
  • Initiate communication for a concrete outcome in
    a social context
  • Give a picture of a desired object to a
    communication partner in exchange for the object
  • Characteristics
  • Teaches requesting
  • Tangible outcomes
  • Initiation of communication
  • Social context
  • No verbal prompts
  • Does not require prerequisite skills

4
PECS Phases
  • This study focused on Phases 1 3
  • Phase 1
  • Teaching the physical exchange
  • Phase 2
  • Distance and Persistence
  • Phase 3
  • Discrimination
  • Phases 4 6
  • Building sentence structure, Responding to
    questions, Commenting

5
PECS Literature
  • Bondy and Frost (1994)
  • Rapid acquisition of PECS behaviors
  • Co-development of speech
  • Other Literature
  • Bondy Frost (1993) Lima, Peru
  • Daly Bondy (Bondy and Frost, 2001)
  • Schwartz, Garfinkle, Bauer (1998)
  • Liddle (2001)
  • Adkins Axelrod (2002)
  • Charlop-Christy, Carpenter, Le, LeBlanc, Kellet
    (2002)
  • Empirically-based studies
  • Need for continued study

6
Research Questions
  • 1.) Does the use of PECS generalize
  • to untrained settings?
  • 2.) Does the use of PECS transition
  • across untrained communication
  • partners?
  • Additional question of interest
  • Does the use of PECS result in increases in
    spoken language?

7
Method
  • Participants
  • 4 children with autism ages 7 9 years male
    absence of functional communication
  • Materials
  • Items Reinforcement Inventory
  • Pictures and binders
  • Score sheets, observation forms, and procedural
    fidelity checklists
  • Design
  • Single-subject with multiple baselines across
    participants

8
Method
  • Independent Variable PECS Program
  • Dependent Variables
  • Acquisition and generalization of PECS behaviors
  • Verbalizations
  • Coding of verbalizations
  • 1. Spontaneous or prompted
  • 2. Intelligible or Unintelligible
  • Procedure
  • Baseline
  • Intervention 30 trials per day 3 days per week
    for 6 weeks
  • Generalization Probes twice a week in both
    school and home settings

9
Reliability
  • Dependent Variables
  • Acquisition of PECS behaviors 94
  • Generalization of PECS behaviors 97
  • Verbalizations (spontaneous or prompted)
  • Baseline and Intervention 75
  • Generalization 89
  • Independent Variable
  • PECS Program 100 agreement

10
Acquisition of PECS Behaviors
11
Results
  • Acquisition of PECS Behaviors
  • All participants rapidly acquired PECS behaviors
    (6 weeks)
  • Generalization of PECS Behaviors Across Settings
  • All participants generalized PECS behaviors to
    both home and school settings
  • Generalization of PECS Behaviors Across Partners
  • All participants generalized across communication
    partners

12
Generalization of PECS Behaviors Across Settings
and Partners
  • Settings ( of exchanges)
  • -Home -School
  • Travis 53 26
  • Rick 13 19
  • Ryan 34 11
  • Ethan 15 11
  • Partners
  • -Home -School
  • Travis 4 times, 1CP 2 times, 2 CPs
  • Rick 4 times, 1 CP 2 times, 2 CPs
  • Ryan 0 2 times, 1 CP
  • Ethan 0 5 times, 1 CP

13
Results
  • Verbalizations
  • Baseline and Intervention Sessions
  • All participants increased the number of
    verbalizations
  • All participants increased the spontaneity of
    verbalizations
  • 3 of the 4 participants increased the
    intelligibility of verbalizations
  • Generalization Probes
  • All participants produced a minimal number of
    verbalizations

14
Verbalizations Produced during Baseline and
Intervention (Rick)
15
Clinical Implications and Directions for Future
Study
  • Limitations
  • Structured Environment
  • Peer interactions
  • Differences between talkers and non-talkers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com