Forest Dwelling Households Labor Allocation: Implications for NWFP Conservation in Kerala, India - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Forest Dwelling Households Labor Allocation: Implications for NWFP Conservation in Kerala, India

Description:

Forest Dwelling Households Labor Allocation: Implications for NWFP Conservation in Kerala, India – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: dij5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Forest Dwelling Households Labor Allocation: Implications for NWFP Conservation in Kerala, India


1
Forest Dwelling Households Labor Allocation
Implications for NWFP Conservation in Kerala,
India

2
Non-Wood Forest Products
Asparagus racemosus willd.
Chanangha
3
Non-Wood Forest Products
Goods of biological origin, other than wood, as
well as services derived from forests and allied
land uses (FAO, 1995)
Asparagus racemosus willd.
Chanangha
4
Limitations of NWFP-based initiatives
  • NWFP-based initiatives are not achieving both
    conservation and local development
  • Insufficient economic incentive to conserve
    forest
  • Unsustainable extraction over-harvesting and
    destructive harvesting techniques

5
Alternative approach to NWFP conservation
  • Cultivation of high-value NWFPs
  • World Bank funded project
  • Kerala Forest Department and
  • Tropical Botanical Garden Research Institute
  • Kanikkar Tribe
  • Cultivation of Tricholomus zeylanica

6
Research Question
  • How do returns from cultivation of high-value
    NWFPs affect forest-dwelling households reliance
    on NWFP collection for income?
  • Will returns from cultivation of NWFPs reduce the
    labor that households allocate to NWFP
    collection?

7
Kerala
Map from Conservation International
8
Kerala
Biodiversity Hotspot
Map from Conservation International
9
Kerala
Biodiversity Hotspot 27 is forests (moist
deciduous, dry deciduous, evergreen,
semi-evergreen and temperate
Map from WCMC
10
Kerala
Biodiversity Hotspot 27 is forests (moist
deciduous, dry deciduous, evergreen,
semi-evergreen and temperate Source of timber
(teak) and NWFPs (mainly medicinal plants)
Map from WCMC
11
Kerala
Biodiversity Hotspot 27 is forests (moist
deciduous, dry deciduous, evergreen,
semi-evergreen and temperate Source of timber
(teak) and NWFPs (mainly medicinal plants)
Research site
Map from WCMC
12
Kani
13
Kani
14
Kani
15
Kani
16
Kani
17
Activity Choices
Bark of Symplocos cochinchinensis
18
Activity Choices
Bark of Symplocos cochinchinensis
19
Activity Choices
Bark of Symplocos cochinchinensis
20
Regulations on NWFPs collection
  • Only forest-dwelling households (scheduled tribes)

Cosinium fenestratum
21
Regulations on NWFPs collection
  • Only forest-dwelling households (scheduled
    tribes)
  • Restrictions regarding species permit for 140
    species

Cosinium fenestratum
22
Peppara Forest Sanctuary
23
Terminalia chebula
24
Fruits of Terminalia chebula
Terminalia chebula
25
NWFP trade
SC/ST SOCIETY
TRIBAL COLLECTOR
26
NWFP trade
SC/ST SOCIETY
TRIBAL COLLECTOR
MIDDLEMEN or TRADERS
CONSUMER
27
Cultivation
28
Cultivation
29
Cultivation
30
Cash crop sale
31
Cash crop sale
32
Cash crop sale
33
Research Question
  • Will returns from cultivation of NWFPs reduce the
    labor that households allocate to NWFP
    collection?
  • Are returns from cultivation of cash crops
    inversely related to household labor allocated to
    NWFP collection?

34
Assumptions
  • Production and consumption decisions are made
    jointly

35
Assumptions
  • Production and consumption decisions are made
    jointly
  • Households do not purchase NWFPs

36
Assumptions
  • Production and consumption decisions are made
    jointly
  • Households do not purchase NWFPs
  • Reduced labor allocation to NWFP collection will
    alleviate pressure on the forest

37
Assumptions
  • Production and consumption decisions are made
    jointly
  • Households do not purchase NWFPs
  • Reduced labor allocation to NWFP collection will
    alleviate pressure on the forest
  • Returns from cash crops and cultivated medicinal
    plants have a similar impact on a households
    allocation of labor to NWFP collection.

38
What the literature suggests
  • Theoretical models ambiguous relationship
    between returns and labor allocation to forest
    activities

39
What the literature suggests
  • Theoretical models ambiguous relationship
    between returns and labor allocation to forest
    activities
  • Positive relationship between agricultural output
    prices and deforestation

40
What the literature suggests
  • Theoretical models ambiguous relationship
    between returns and labor allocation to forest
    activities
  • Positive relationship between agricultural output
    prices and deforestation
  • Negative relationship between off-farm wage and
    deforestation

41
Quantitative and qualitative data
  • Questionnaire (n94)
  • Random sample
  • Four settlements
  • Semi-structured interviews (n30)
  • Observation of selling of NWFPs and cash crops

42
Preliminary Findings
  • Households involved in
  • Cultivation, collection and daily wage 22.3
  • Cultivation and collection 62.8
  • Cultivation and daily wage 1
  • Cultivation only 10.6
  • Collection only 3.3

43
Preliminary Findings
  • Descriptive statistics (mean (sd))
  • Household size 4 (1.5)
  • Land size 1.21 ha (0.55)
  • Household head age 42.3 years (14.4)
  • Total labor available 602.4 days (292.2)
  • Years living in area 18.3 years (12.3)

44
Preliminary Findings
  • Cultivation
  • Income 166.92/yr (110.25)
  • Labor share 0.28 (0.09)
  • Collection
  • Income 122.49/yr (84.13)
  • Labor share 0.25 (0.16)

45
Preliminary regression analysis
Li f(Wc, Wf, Ww,B, ? ) Li labor share i
c (cultivation) or f (forest collection) Wc per
day returns to cultivation Wf per day returns
to forest activity Ww off-farm wage B makes
baskets ? household characteristics
46
Preliminary regression analysis
Lc f(Wc, Wf, Ww,B, ? )
47
Preliminary regression analysis
Lc f(Wc, Wf, Ww,B, ? )
R2 0.23
sig 0.05 sig 0.1
48
Preliminary regression analysis
Lf f(Wc, Wf, Ww,B, ? )
49
Preliminary regression analysis
Lf f(Wc, Wf, Ww,B, ? )
R2 0.30
sig 0.05 sig 0.1
50
Preliminary thoughts on implications for NWFP
conservation
  • Positive relationship between returns from
    cultivation and labor that a household allocated
    to forest production collection

51
Preliminary thoughts on implications for NWFP
conservation
  • Positive relationship between returns from
    cultivation and labor that a household allocated
    to forest production collection
  • Increase returns from NWFP collection

52
Preliminary thoughts on implications for NWFP
conservation
  • Positive relationship between returns from
    cultivation and labor that a household allocated
    to forest production collection
  • Increase returns from NWFP collection
  • Institutional issues

53
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com