Title: Forest Dwelling Households Labor Allocation: Implications for NWFP Conservation in Kerala, India
1Forest Dwelling Households Labor Allocation
Implications for NWFP Conservation in Kerala,
India
2Non-Wood Forest Products
Asparagus racemosus willd.
Chanangha
3Non-Wood Forest Products
Goods of biological origin, other than wood, as
well as services derived from forests and allied
land uses (FAO, 1995)
Asparagus racemosus willd.
Chanangha
4Limitations of NWFP-based initiatives
- NWFP-based initiatives are not achieving both
conservation and local development - Insufficient economic incentive to conserve
forest - Unsustainable extraction over-harvesting and
destructive harvesting techniques
5Alternative approach to NWFP conservation
- Cultivation of high-value NWFPs
- World Bank funded project
- Kerala Forest Department and
- Tropical Botanical Garden Research Institute
- Kanikkar Tribe
- Cultivation of Tricholomus zeylanica
6Research Question
- How do returns from cultivation of high-value
NWFPs affect forest-dwelling households reliance
on NWFP collection for income? - Will returns from cultivation of NWFPs reduce the
labor that households allocate to NWFP
collection?
7Kerala
Map from Conservation International
8Kerala
Biodiversity Hotspot
Map from Conservation International
9Kerala
Biodiversity Hotspot 27 is forests (moist
deciduous, dry deciduous, evergreen,
semi-evergreen and temperate
Map from WCMC
10Kerala
Biodiversity Hotspot 27 is forests (moist
deciduous, dry deciduous, evergreen,
semi-evergreen and temperate Source of timber
(teak) and NWFPs (mainly medicinal plants)
Map from WCMC
11Kerala
Biodiversity Hotspot 27 is forests (moist
deciduous, dry deciduous, evergreen,
semi-evergreen and temperate Source of timber
(teak) and NWFPs (mainly medicinal plants)
Research site
Map from WCMC
12Kani
13Kani
14Kani
15Kani
16Kani
17Activity Choices
Bark of Symplocos cochinchinensis
18Activity Choices
Bark of Symplocos cochinchinensis
19Activity Choices
Bark of Symplocos cochinchinensis
20Regulations on NWFPs collection
- Only forest-dwelling households (scheduled tribes)
Cosinium fenestratum
21Regulations on NWFPs collection
- Only forest-dwelling households (scheduled
tribes) - Restrictions regarding species permit for 140
species
Cosinium fenestratum
22Peppara Forest Sanctuary
23Terminalia chebula
24Fruits of Terminalia chebula
Terminalia chebula
25NWFP trade
SC/ST SOCIETY
TRIBAL COLLECTOR
26NWFP trade
SC/ST SOCIETY
TRIBAL COLLECTOR
MIDDLEMEN or TRADERS
CONSUMER
27Cultivation
28Cultivation
29Cultivation
30Cash crop sale
31Cash crop sale
32Cash crop sale
33Research Question
- Will returns from cultivation of NWFPs reduce the
labor that households allocate to NWFP
collection? - Are returns from cultivation of cash crops
inversely related to household labor allocated to
NWFP collection?
34Assumptions
- Production and consumption decisions are made
jointly
35Assumptions
- Production and consumption decisions are made
jointly - Households do not purchase NWFPs
36Assumptions
- Production and consumption decisions are made
jointly - Households do not purchase NWFPs
- Reduced labor allocation to NWFP collection will
alleviate pressure on the forest
37Assumptions
- Production and consumption decisions are made
jointly - Households do not purchase NWFPs
- Reduced labor allocation to NWFP collection will
alleviate pressure on the forest - Returns from cash crops and cultivated medicinal
plants have a similar impact on a households
allocation of labor to NWFP collection.
38What the literature suggests
- Theoretical models ambiguous relationship
between returns and labor allocation to forest
activities
39What the literature suggests
- Theoretical models ambiguous relationship
between returns and labor allocation to forest
activities - Positive relationship between agricultural output
prices and deforestation
40What the literature suggests
- Theoretical models ambiguous relationship
between returns and labor allocation to forest
activities - Positive relationship between agricultural output
prices and deforestation - Negative relationship between off-farm wage and
deforestation
41Quantitative and qualitative data
- Questionnaire (n94)
- Random sample
- Four settlements
- Semi-structured interviews (n30)
- Observation of selling of NWFPs and cash crops
42Preliminary Findings
- Households involved in
- Cultivation, collection and daily wage 22.3
- Cultivation and collection 62.8
- Cultivation and daily wage 1
- Cultivation only 10.6
- Collection only 3.3
43Preliminary Findings
- Descriptive statistics (mean (sd))
- Household size 4 (1.5)
- Land size 1.21 ha (0.55)
- Household head age 42.3 years (14.4)
- Total labor available 602.4 days (292.2)
- Years living in area 18.3 years (12.3)
44Preliminary Findings
- Cultivation
- Income 166.92/yr (110.25)
- Labor share 0.28 (0.09)
- Collection
- Income 122.49/yr (84.13)
- Labor share 0.25 (0.16)
45Preliminary regression analysis
Li f(Wc, Wf, Ww,B, ? ) Li labor share i
c (cultivation) or f (forest collection) Wc per
day returns to cultivation Wf per day returns
to forest activity Ww off-farm wage B makes
baskets ? household characteristics
46Preliminary regression analysis
Lc f(Wc, Wf, Ww,B, ? )
47Preliminary regression analysis
Lc f(Wc, Wf, Ww,B, ? )
R2 0.23
sig 0.05 sig 0.1
48Preliminary regression analysis
Lf f(Wc, Wf, Ww,B, ? )
49Preliminary regression analysis
Lf f(Wc, Wf, Ww,B, ? )
R2 0.30
sig 0.05 sig 0.1
50Preliminary thoughts on implications for NWFP
conservation
- Positive relationship between returns from
cultivation and labor that a household allocated
to forest production collection
51Preliminary thoughts on implications for NWFP
conservation
- Positive relationship between returns from
cultivation and labor that a household allocated
to forest production collection - Increase returns from NWFP collection
52Preliminary thoughts on implications for NWFP
conservation
- Positive relationship between returns from
cultivation and labor that a household allocated
to forest production collection - Increase returns from NWFP collection
- Institutional issues
53(No Transcript)