In what new technical directions should we be heading - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

In what new technical directions should we be heading

Description:

Gary Baldwin, Hugo De Man, Mark Horowitz. Akira Kanuma, Toshiaki Masuhara. Extend the successful SSCS model of combining innovative ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: gar8156
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: In what new technical directions should we be heading


1
Long-Range PlanningTechnology Scanning
Gary Baldwin, Hugo De Man, Mark Horowitz Akira
Kanuma, Toshiaki Masuhara
  • In what new technical directions should we be
    heading?
  • What might we have missed?
  • How should we incorporate any findings into SSCS?
  • Affiliations / meetings / publications /
    educational thrusts, based on new technical
    directions?

2
  • Extend the successful SSCS model of combining
    innovative research with practical issues,
    leading to commercially interesting
    technologies.
  • Working with proven technologies may miss new
    opportunities.
  • SSCS abilities in commercially viable research
    may lend help to those working on new
    technologies that now only have a hint of
    commercial viability.
  • Hence, scan to identify some of these new
    technologies and stimulate the SSCS community
    to work on them.

3
Link to ISSCC Technology Directions Committee
  • Topics submitted for consideration
    (confidential)
  • Quantum / nanoelectronic circuit design
  • Gate / circuit design with new materials (e.g.,
    FE)
  • MEMs in and impact upon circuits
  • Organic (plastic) devices in circuits
  • On-chip communications
  • Embedded System design

4
  • Organics
  • Bio
  • Photonics, from components integration
    perspective
  • Re-configurable circuits (from Xilinx block to
    full systems)
  • Think beyond silicon but build on fabrication
    methodology for other devices/circuits
  • Interconnect technologies
  • Sensors (sponsor Sensors Council?)

Your comments?
  • Request your inputs (your best one (1)) before
    next AdComm meeting (August)
    garyb_at_eecs.berkeley.edu

5
Scorecard Adcomm.
Long-range Planning Comm.
0
5
6
Initially, specific suggestions of new areas to
explore
  • Organic semiconductors, especially large-area,
    extremely low-cost, flexible substrates
  • Bio-chips, mixing new system design approaches
    with traditional silicon fabrication
    modalities, or new ones (inkjet)
  • Soft errors in ICs a workshop to educate
    designers
  • Novel embedded systems design, not covered by
    existing conferences (design, test, long lead
    times, heterogeneity)
  • Impact of new materials on design, especially on
    logic memory (FeRAM, MRAM, etc.)

7
A more generic, potentially more profound
approach (inspired by de Man)
  • As technologies evolve (e.g., continuously
    doubling transistor count or clock speed) and
    incorporate new devices and materials (bio,
    nano, organo, etc.), most likely the real
    progress will result from merging presently
    unconnected domains and techno-cultures to
    create, for example, the ultra-low power, low
    cost, always-connected devices operating on
    novel energy sources and other, presently
    unforseen applications.

8
The biggest challenge will be to bring visionary
people together that are willing to start a
dialogue on what these future micro-systems will
look like and how we will join forces to make
progress in this new field of super-circuit
design.
  • Bio-electronics, health care and comfort
    electronics
  • Nano-electronics (both top-down CMOS and
    bottom-up micro- electronics)
  • Technology around CMOS (MEMS, NEMS, Plastic,
    Packaging (interconnect, 3D silicon))
  • Configurable architectures and intelligent
    networks on a chip
  • Marriage between Opto and electronics
  • Networking and 4G wireless
  • Advanced (embedded) programming and human
    interfacing
  • Applications in transportation, education,
    security, environmental monitoring and control

9
Therefore,
  • As an IEEE Society, we must create mechanisms
    for dialogue to bring
  • design-oriented people together, join in acts
    of creativity and thinking on how to
    facilitate design methodology simultaneously
    across the boundaries of technologies and
    applications, respectively.
  • There are many models for doing this (Gordon
    conferences, Aspen meeting, Intl. Workshop on
    Future Info. Processing Tech., etc.).
  • SSCS should take the lead in this endeavour from
    its historical role in the rapid, pervasive
    commercialization of new technology.
  • It could fundamentally change the Society and
    its impact on society.
  • Where do we start? What do we do next? Is this
    being handled adequately elsewhere within SSCS
    or its affiliates? Thats part of the
    continuing dialogue of this committee.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com