Title: Producing Web Course Material with IBM Knowledge Factory Team
1Producing Web Course Material with IBM Knowledge
Factory Team
- Harri Laine, Teemu Kerola
- Department of
- Computer Science
- University of Helsinki
2Big Picture
Course Material Production (IBM Knowl. Fact.
Process, )
email, chat, discussion groups
hyper-media self-study material
web teaching (lectures, etc)
Learning Platform (WebCT, LLS,)
web collaboration tools
web (self)evaluation tools
f2f collaborative work
f2f teaching (lectures, etc)
books, etc
3Self-Study Material
- Interactive book
- must be better than conventional book
- Animations, movies, sound ,
- Links to references other topics
- prerequisite material, on-demand courses?
- Navigation, tracking
- what have I done already? what next?
- for student? for teacher?
- Self-evaluation questions
- On-line exams
multimedia
hypertext
4Media requirements
- For example
- Multi-media PC
- 56KB Internet connection
- Data accessed with browser from learning platform
(e.g., WebCT, Lotus LS) - Need to match
- produced material
- learning platform
- end-user media
IBM Knowledge Producer
Lotus Learning Space
Student desktop at home
5Knowledge Factory Concept
- Knowledge Factory (KF) Team
- 14 roles 14 types of people doing the job
- some roles may be taken by client
- E.g., Subject Matter Expert
- most roles taken by KF Team
- many roles combined to one person
- some roles need more than one person
- E.g., Content Developer
- External Team special expertise areas
- Core Team actual product development
6Knowledge Factory Team
- External Team 8 roles
- Subject Matter Expert
- Production Manager, Media Architect
- Technical Specialist, A/V Specialist
- Production Artist, Photographer
- Quality Tester
- Core Team 6 roles
- Instructional Designer
- Courseware Engineer, Content Analyst
- Content Developer (plus Voice?)
- Media Coordinator, Quality Coordinator
7Knowledge Factory Process
- Analyze current and existing material
- select new material type, instructional method
- High Level Design Document (HLDD)
- goal, expectations, target audience
- navigation, look and feel
- instructional theme, instructional strategy
methods - course outline, modules, module dependencies
- For each module, Detailed Design Doc (DDD)
- draft (E.g., with PowerPoint) on each view for
student - navigation, text, voice, hotspots, animations,
- used by Content Developers to produce final
material - Knowledge Producer (KP) tool
- Quality control by Quality Tester and client
agreement, contract
8Experiences
- Course Introduction to Databases (18 modules)
- divided among 4 universities
- our first 2 modules
- Relational Algebra (about 2 lecture hours 6
working hours) - SQL DDL (about 1 lecture hour 3 working hours)
- Our starting point
- Existing material in Finnish simple HTML,
simple style, no sound, any browser, printable - We did not know the process
- Preparations
- Translation in English
9Experiences
10Experiences
Look feel no scrolling, fixed size
window audio in each page
11Experiences
- DDL 2 tries initial version with PowerPoint
12Experiences
final version off DDD used templates (MSWord) 159
pages about 40 tasks/questions about 25 pages
reachable only by incorrect answers about 30
pages cartoon like sequences
13Experiences
- First version
- straightforward splitting of the manuscript into
small pages - reflection questions added - instructional designer changed during development
- errors in formulas, errors in graphics
- Second try
- inductive learning
- database expert included in the team
- new layout, less errors
- only one browser, server dependence ?
14Experiences
- well defined but laborious process
- closer co-operation with implementors needed
- hard to fit university teacher schedules with
implementation team schedules (part time full
time) - hard to catch the functionality of the material
from the DDD too early decisions about control - overall responsibility of the course was missing
- how to maintain the course is a problem ?
15Example screen
16Example screen
17Example screen
18Example screen
19Example screen