Producing Web Course Material with IBM Knowledge Factory Team PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Producing Web Course Material with IBM Knowledge Factory Team


1
Producing Web Course Material with IBM Knowledge
Factory Team
  • Harri Laine, Teemu Kerola
  • Department of
  • Computer Science
  • University of Helsinki

2
Big Picture
Course Material Production (IBM Knowl. Fact.
Process, )
email, chat, discussion groups
hyper-media self-study material
web teaching (lectures, etc)
Learning Platform (WebCT, LLS,)
web collaboration tools
web (self)evaluation tools
f2f collaborative work
f2f teaching (lectures, etc)
books, etc
3
Self-Study Material
  • Interactive book
  • must be better than conventional book
  • Animations, movies, sound ,
  • Links to references other topics
  • prerequisite material, on-demand courses?
  • Navigation, tracking
  • what have I done already? what next?
  • for student? for teacher?
  • Self-evaluation questions
  • On-line exams

multimedia
hypertext
4
Media requirements
  • For example
  • Multi-media PC
  • 56KB Internet connection
  • Data accessed with browser from learning platform
    (e.g., WebCT, Lotus LS)
  • Need to match
  • produced material
  • learning platform
  • end-user media

IBM Knowledge Producer
Lotus Learning Space
Student desktop at home
5
Knowledge Factory Concept
  • Knowledge Factory (KF) Team
  • 14 roles 14 types of people doing the job
  • some roles may be taken by client
  • E.g., Subject Matter Expert
  • most roles taken by KF Team
  • many roles combined to one person
  • some roles need more than one person
  • E.g., Content Developer
  • External Team special expertise areas
  • Core Team actual product development

6
Knowledge Factory Team
  • External Team 8 roles
  • Subject Matter Expert
  • Production Manager, Media Architect
  • Technical Specialist, A/V Specialist
  • Production Artist, Photographer
  • Quality Tester
  • Core Team 6 roles
  • Instructional Designer
  • Courseware Engineer, Content Analyst
  • Content Developer (plus Voice?)
  • Media Coordinator, Quality Coordinator

7
Knowledge Factory Process
  • Analyze current and existing material
  • select new material type, instructional method
  • High Level Design Document (HLDD)
  • goal, expectations, target audience
  • navigation, look and feel
  • instructional theme, instructional strategy
    methods
  • course outline, modules, module dependencies
  • For each module, Detailed Design Doc (DDD)
  • draft (E.g., with PowerPoint) on each view for
    student
  • navigation, text, voice, hotspots, animations,
  • used by Content Developers to produce final
    material
  • Knowledge Producer (KP) tool
  • Quality control by Quality Tester and client

agreement, contract
8
Experiences
  • Course Introduction to Databases (18 modules)
  • divided among 4 universities
  • our first 2 modules
  • Relational Algebra (about 2 lecture hours 6
    working hours)
  • SQL DDL (about 1 lecture hour 3 working hours)
  • Our starting point
  • Existing material in Finnish simple HTML,
    simple style, no sound, any browser, printable
  • We did not know the process
  • Preparations
  • Translation in English

9
Experiences
  • HDDL of 24 pages

10
Experiences
Look feel no scrolling, fixed size
window audio in each page
11
Experiences
  • DDL 2 tries initial version with PowerPoint

12
Experiences
final version off DDD used templates (MSWord) 159
pages about 40 tasks/questions about 25 pages
reachable only by incorrect answers about 30
pages cartoon like sequences
13
Experiences
  • First version
  • straightforward splitting of the manuscript into
    small pages - reflection questions added
  • instructional designer changed during development
  • errors in formulas, errors in graphics
  • Second try
  • inductive learning
  • database expert included in the team
  • new layout, less errors
  • only one browser, server dependence ?

14
Experiences
  • well defined but laborious process
  • closer co-operation with implementors needed
  • hard to fit university teacher schedules with
    implementation team schedules (part time full
    time)
  • hard to catch the functionality of the material
    from the DDD too early decisions about control
  • overall responsibility of the course was missing
  • how to maintain the course is a problem ?

15
Example screen
16
Example screen
17
Example screen
18
Example screen
19
Example screen
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com