Wireless Power Supply - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Wireless Power Supply

Description:

Wireless Power Supply. Final Presentation. Speakers: Ralph Leijenaar. Ren van Bussel ... MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply. 4. BikeLights. PowerWifi. CET ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: Fran52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Wireless Power Supply


1
Wireless Power Supply
  • Final Presentation
  • Speakers Ralph Leijenaar
  • René van Bussel

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Choice of applications
  • BikeLights
  • PowerSaver
  • Conclusion
  • Questions

3
Choice of applications
4
All applications
PowerWifi
CET desktop
BikeLights
Powercast
Backpack
Speakers
StandbySaver
Laptop screen
Vacuum cleaner
5
Criteria
  • Criteria for applications
  • User-friendly, easily standardized
  • Technically possible to make now
  • Economically feasible, compete with current
    technology
  • Sustainable
  • Health and environment safe, FCC compliant

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
5
6
Criteria
BikeLights
StandbySaver
10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
6
7
Bike lights
10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
7
8
Design
  • Hub dynamo powers 5.8 GHz transmitter
  • Hub dynamo delivers 3 W of power
  • LED lights
  • Consisting of 3 to 4 LEDs
  • Complete back surface is 5.8 GHz rectenna

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
8
9
Power
  • Received power Pr calculated with Friis equation
    (front)
  • Average LED light power consumption
  • 60-80mA
  • 3V circuit 180-240mW
  • Wireless powering without batteries not feasible
    ? use for recharging batteries

10
Health hazards
  • Most problematic effect of RF radiation on the
    body heating effect
  • Measured by Specific Absorption Rate
    (SAR) (power absorbed by the body per unit mass)
  • Applications have to comply with SAR limits

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
10
11
Health hazards SAR calculation
  • Male human
  • ? 1070 kg/m3
  • Speed of light c 3108 m/s
  • permittivity of free space is e0 8.85 10-12
    F/m.
  • s and er tissue and frequency dependant,
    calculation
  • s 3.87 S/m
  • er 36.9
  • BikeLights
  • average distance to the body r 0.5 m
  • distance to nearest body part (foot/leg) r 0.3
    m
  • Input power P 3 W

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
11
12
Health hazards BikeLight SAR values
  • Whole-body SAR (averaged distance) 0.035 W/kg
  • Local SAR (foot/leg) 0.098 W/kg

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
12
13
Environment
  • Assuming the batteries are only recharged while
    the LED light itself is in use an estimation of
    the ratio of the time the LED lights can be used
    with and without recharging can be made (Tr)
  • Assuming a power usage of 60mA and recharging
    with 1,72mA (5.17 mW / 3V)
  • Increase of 3
  • Charge batteries when lights are off ? better
    increase
  • No real environmental benefits

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
13
14
Economic aspects
  • With respect to wired lighting using a normal
    dynamo
  • Hub dynamo more expensive
  • Normal dynamo starting at 10,- to 25,-
  • Hub dynamo starting at 30,- to 40,-
  • Transmitter and rectenna costs
  • Rechargeable batteries used
  • With respect to normal LED lighting ? no extra
    costs
  • With respect to wired lighting ? only costs of 1
    set of batteries

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
14
15
Bike lights conclusion
Criteria Points before Points after
User friendliness 9 6
Technical feasibility 8 5
Economical feasibility 9 6
Sustainability 9 6
Health 8 8
Total 43 31
16
Future improvements
  • Main goals
  • Increase power received by LED lights
  • Reduce power needed by LED lights

17
Recommendations
  • Increase power received by LED lights
  • Improve transmitting antenna gain
  • Second dynamotransmitter in rear hub for rear
    light
  • No interference cyclist
  • Back light virtually same amount of received
    power as front light ? easier to standardize the
    LED lights
  • Reduce power needed by LED lights
  • Use high efficiency LEDs ? preferably low powered
  • Note
  • Increasing power output dynamo transmitter ?
    health issues ? no solution/improvement

18
Standby saver
10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
18
19
Design
  • Antenna in the remote control
  • Radio waves of 5.8 GHz
  • Rectenna in TV switches relay

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
19
20
Power
  • Transmitted power again calculated with the Friis
    equation
  • A lot of power required, but for a short time,
    3ms
  • Possible to use longer, lower power pulse
  • At 500 ms only 12 W is needed

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
20
21
Health hazards SAR
  • Again, heating and SAR important
  • s, ?, c, e0, and er are the same as the bike
    lights, r and P are different
  • Differences
  • average distance to the body r 0.4 m
  • distance to nearest body part (thumb/hand) r
    0.02 m
  • Input power P 12 W

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
21
22
Health hazards, calculation
  • The SAR is calculated averaged over time
  • Whole-body SAR (averaged distance) 0.00031 W/kg
  • Local SAR (hand) 0.12 W/kg
  • Used just one time in six minutes
  • Directivity, probably lower SAR

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
22
23
Environment
  • Standby functions 5 of power used in developed
    countries
  • Suitable for TV, not convenient for VCR
  • TVs average 21 kWh/year per household
  • Remote uses batteries, but surprisingly little
  • Very difficult to implement in existing devices

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
23
24
Economic aspects
  • Saves electricity, thus money
  • 4,20 per year per household
  • More batteries used, not significant
  • TV more expensive remote, antennas, more
    materials
  • Could be sold as environment saving idea

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
24
25
Conclusions
Criteria Points before Points after
User friendliness 8 8
Technical feasibility 8 7
Economical feasibility 9 8
Sustainability 9 8
Health 8 8
Total 43 39
10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
25
26
Future improvements Recommendations
  • Reduce power needed to switch the relay
  • Less power less batteries
  • For existing devices a seperate standby saver
    could be used between the plug and socket
  • The converting of a half-second-long radio beam
    to a millisecond pulse is idealised

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
26
27
Conclusion
10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
27
28
Conclusion bike lights
  • Impossible to use wireless power for bike lights
  • Charging is an option
  • SAR calculations show no health hazards
  • Little environmental impact
  • Batteries still needed
  • Material costs higher than existing lights
  • Recommendations
  • Increase the antenna gain use a second dynamo
    for the back light
  • Improve LED efficiency

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
28
29
Conclusion standby saver
  • Possible using a frequency of 5.8 GHz
  • SAR within limits
  • Assuming it is not used often in six minutes
  • Environment 5 of power used in developed
    countries is standby power
  • Not suited for all applications
  • For the same reason not a lot of money saved per
    household
  • 4,20
  • Recommendations
  • Reduce power to switch relay, use a separate
    device for existing devices, look into the
    conversion

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
29
30
Questions?
  • ?

10-12-2007
MDP Group 1 Wireless Power Supply
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com