Transfer Pricing: Envisaged Changes to the RF Tax Code - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Transfer Pricing: Envisaged Changes to the RF Tax Code

Description:

Partner, Ernst & Young. Head of International Tax, Russia and CIS. Tel: (495) 755-97-86 ... in the Russian Federation. Transfer Pricing Methods ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: henrik74
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transfer Pricing: Envisaged Changes to the RF Tax Code


1
Transfer Pricing Envisaged Changes to the RF Tax
Code
AEB Association of European Businesses in the
Russian Federation
  • Stephan Beck
  • Partner, Ernst Young
  • Head of International Tax, Russia and CIS
  • Tel (495) 755-97-86

2
Discussion Points
  • Some Selected discussion points related to
  • Transfer Pricing Methods and Economic Aspects
  • Reporting and Documentation Aspects

3
Transfer Pricing Methods
  • Current TP Legislation
  • Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) Method
  • Resale Minus Method
  • Cost Plus Method
  • Strict hierarchy
  • Draft TP Law
  • Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) Method
  • 2a. Resale Minus Method
  • 2b. Cost Plus Method
  • 2c. Sale of Processed Product (Secondary Product)
    Method
  • 2d. Comparable Profits Method
  • 3. Profit Split Method
  • Hierarchy but with flexibility
  • Best method approach

4
Transfer Pricing Methods
  • A wider selection of methods in the latest draft
    is good news
  • Easier to align with international TP policy
  • Easier to establish which is the best TP method
    to use
  • However, some clarification is required, in
    particular
  • TNMM should also be permitted
  • Sale of Processed Product (Secondary Product)
    Method reasonable?
  • Not an internationally known or used TP method
  • Gives rise to various questions and uncertainties
    and should possibly be eliminated
  • Application of profit-split should be broadened
    (situations mentioned should only be examples)
  • Examples should be provided as to when certain
    methods may be used and be acceptable to reduce
    extent of potential disputes
  • Internal CUPs should be included as appropriate
    benchmarks

5
TP Methods
  • How to be interpreted?
  • Mark-up at all stages across supply chain ?
  • Allocation of losses ? e.g.,
  • Production cost exceed market price
  • Mark-up requirement results in stage 4 incurring
    cost gt market price

6
Normal cost and normal profit
  • Exclusion of shareholder/stewardship cost
    generally internationally accepted in order to
    determine the operational arms length result,
    but
  • Cost not normal to one organization may be normal
    to others (e.g., higher headcount, even if
    otherwise comparable economic/commercial
    conditions)
  • Exclusion of cost for services appears
    problematic
  • Cost directly connected should be defined to
    also include overhead or indirect cost.
  • Clarification recommendable also that any
    reasonable allocation method (or method used for
    business purposes) to be accepted
  • Accounting records as basis ?
  • Not all relevant data may be reflected in
    accounts (e.g., depreciated assets)
  • Different accounting standards may apply on both
    sides of the transactions
  • Typically do not reflect the value of intangible
    assets
  • Clarifications recommendable as to acceptability
    of loss situations in context of different market
    strategies (e.g., start-up losses)

7
The Market Price Range
  • Current TP Legislation
  • Refers to the market price
  • Taxpayers are allowed to deviate by 20 from the
    market price
  • 20 safe harbour
  • Draft TP Law
  • Introduces a market price (profit) range
  • Acknowledgement that there is not one market
    price only
  • Identify all market prices
  • Compute market price range
  • Proposed range is heavily influenced by the
    extreme observations

8
The Market Price Range
  • The market/profit price range concept is in
    line with international TP practice
  • International practice Interquartile range
  • The suggested statistical methodology is not in
    line!
  • Taxpayer will be at the mercy of extreme
    observations
  • Should be aligned with the International accepted
    definition of Interquartile range (and possible
    other statistical methods should be accepted as
    well if appropriate)
  • Clarification should be made that adjustments
    permitted to account for differences
  • Clarification that only public data should be
    permissible to be used to calculate range

9
Market Price Range
  • Interquartile Range Approach
  • Recent project 13 comparable companies
  • Three-year pooled interquartile range Operating
    Margin
  • Draft Laws Market Price Range
  • Same 13 comparable companies
  • Computed ranges based on draft laws definition
    of a market price range

40
40
10
Reporting and Documentation
11
Documentation and Reporting
  • Time permitted for documentation and reporting
    very tight should be extended
  • Possibly limit requests for documentation
    generally to cases of on-site audits?
  • Extensive reporting/declaration obligations
    (information not necessarily readily available),
    and unclear including
  • Aggregation level unclear but should be permitted
    and defined
  • Threshold of 1mio Rbl
  • Limit the amount of reporting with tax return (if
    at all required)
  • E.g., at least reduce to overall volume of
    transaction by related party (possibly by main
    type of transaction such as interest, goods,
    services intellectual property)
  • Economic gain Requirement often practically
    very difficult to satisfy (or at least very
    subjective) without undue efforts and required
    reliability (e.g., Umbrella-Brand v. Sub-Brands)

12
Documentation and Reporting
  • No reference to internal available policies
  • Clarification that available internal policies
    could be used as part of the documentation
  • Functions performed, risk assumed and assets
    employed may not be easily available from all
    parties involved
  • What if unrelated parties involved?
  • Least complex party should be focus
  • Using pan-European (or other) reports and
    benchmarking data would be welcomed for
    cross-border transactions (some adjustments to
    data may be required)
  • Less burdensome, less costly
  • Reporting and documentation requirements both for
    domestic and cross-border transactions necessary ?

13
Possible main documentation contents
Discretionary format Should generally
acceptable content be described to reduce
potential disputes and align with international
practices?
  • Documentation can be done e.g.
  • By Division
  • By Entity
  • By Transaction Category
  • Across Integrated Supply Chain
  • Typical documentation
  • Industry Analysis
  • Company Analysis
  • Functional Analysis
  • Economic Analysis
  • Outline of relevant rules
  • Accept / Reject List

All should be permissible depending on the
specific situation - and possibly examples given
to limit potential disputes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com