Title: Transfer Pricing: Envisaged Changes to the RF Tax Code
1Transfer Pricing Envisaged Changes to the RF Tax
Code
AEB Association of European Businesses in the
Russian Federation
- Stephan Beck
- Partner, Ernst Young
- Head of International Tax, Russia and CIS
- Tel (495) 755-97-86
2Discussion Points
- Some Selected discussion points related to
- Transfer Pricing Methods and Economic Aspects
- Reporting and Documentation Aspects
3Transfer Pricing Methods
- Current TP Legislation
- Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) Method
- Resale Minus Method
- Cost Plus Method
- Strict hierarchy
- Draft TP Law
- Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) Method
- 2a. Resale Minus Method
- 2b. Cost Plus Method
- 2c. Sale of Processed Product (Secondary Product)
Method - 2d. Comparable Profits Method
- 3. Profit Split Method
- Hierarchy but with flexibility
- Best method approach
4Transfer Pricing Methods
- A wider selection of methods in the latest draft
is good news - Easier to align with international TP policy
- Easier to establish which is the best TP method
to use - However, some clarification is required, in
particular - TNMM should also be permitted
- Sale of Processed Product (Secondary Product)
Method reasonable? - Not an internationally known or used TP method
- Gives rise to various questions and uncertainties
and should possibly be eliminated - Application of profit-split should be broadened
(situations mentioned should only be examples) - Examples should be provided as to when certain
methods may be used and be acceptable to reduce
extent of potential disputes - Internal CUPs should be included as appropriate
benchmarks
5TP Methods
- How to be interpreted?
- Mark-up at all stages across supply chain ?
- Allocation of losses ? e.g.,
- Production cost exceed market price
- Mark-up requirement results in stage 4 incurring
cost gt market price
6Normal cost and normal profit
- Exclusion of shareholder/stewardship cost
generally internationally accepted in order to
determine the operational arms length result,
but - Cost not normal to one organization may be normal
to others (e.g., higher headcount, even if
otherwise comparable economic/commercial
conditions) - Exclusion of cost for services appears
problematic - Cost directly connected should be defined to
also include overhead or indirect cost. - Clarification recommendable also that any
reasonable allocation method (or method used for
business purposes) to be accepted - Accounting records as basis ?
- Not all relevant data may be reflected in
accounts (e.g., depreciated assets) - Different accounting standards may apply on both
sides of the transactions - Typically do not reflect the value of intangible
assets - Clarifications recommendable as to acceptability
of loss situations in context of different market
strategies (e.g., start-up losses)
7The Market Price Range
- Current TP Legislation
- Refers to the market price
- Taxpayers are allowed to deviate by 20 from the
market price - 20 safe harbour
- Draft TP Law
- Introduces a market price (profit) range
- Acknowledgement that there is not one market
price only - Identify all market prices
- Compute market price range
- Proposed range is heavily influenced by the
extreme observations
8The Market Price Range
- The market/profit price range concept is in
line with international TP practice - International practice Interquartile range
- The suggested statistical methodology is not in
line! - Taxpayer will be at the mercy of extreme
observations - Should be aligned with the International accepted
definition of Interquartile range (and possible
other statistical methods should be accepted as
well if appropriate) - Clarification should be made that adjustments
permitted to account for differences - Clarification that only public data should be
permissible to be used to calculate range
9Market Price Range
- Interquartile Range Approach
- Recent project 13 comparable companies
- Three-year pooled interquartile range Operating
Margin
- Draft Laws Market Price Range
- Same 13 comparable companies
- Computed ranges based on draft laws definition
of a market price range
40
40
10Reporting and Documentation
11Documentation and Reporting
- Time permitted for documentation and reporting
very tight should be extended - Possibly limit requests for documentation
generally to cases of on-site audits? - Extensive reporting/declaration obligations
(information not necessarily readily available),
and unclear including - Aggregation level unclear but should be permitted
and defined - Threshold of 1mio Rbl
- Limit the amount of reporting with tax return (if
at all required) - E.g., at least reduce to overall volume of
transaction by related party (possibly by main
type of transaction such as interest, goods,
services intellectual property) - Economic gain Requirement often practically
very difficult to satisfy (or at least very
subjective) without undue efforts and required
reliability (e.g., Umbrella-Brand v. Sub-Brands)
12Documentation and Reporting
- No reference to internal available policies
- Clarification that available internal policies
could be used as part of the documentation - Functions performed, risk assumed and assets
employed may not be easily available from all
parties involved - What if unrelated parties involved?
- Least complex party should be focus
- Using pan-European (or other) reports and
benchmarking data would be welcomed for
cross-border transactions (some adjustments to
data may be required) - Less burdensome, less costly
- Reporting and documentation requirements both for
domestic and cross-border transactions necessary ?
13Possible main documentation contents
Discretionary format Should generally
acceptable content be described to reduce
potential disputes and align with international
practices?
- Documentation can be done e.g.
- By Division
- By Entity
- By Transaction Category
- Across Integrated Supply Chain
- Typical documentation
- Industry Analysis
- Company Analysis
- Functional Analysis
- Economic Analysis
- Outline of relevant rules
- Accept / Reject List
All should be permissible depending on the
specific situation - and possibly examples given
to limit potential disputes