Title: ILO/MOLSS International Forum on Chinese High Skilled Workers
1ILO/MOLSS International Forum on Chinese High
Skilled Workers
- Innovative skills policy reforms
- Sector-based approaches to skills development
- A SKILLS-AP Discussion Paper by
- Dr J. Sung and Prof D. Ashton
- presented by Trevor Riordan
- Manager, ILO/SKILLS-AP
2Introduction and background to the discussion
3Introduction
- Increasing demand globally for higher levels of
workforce knowledge and skills, which is driven
by many factors - Need for countries to improve productivity to
compete in the global economy - Move to more higher value-added products with
higher knowledge component - Changing patterns of work organization
- Increasing skills intensification of economies/
jobs - Need to develop higher skilled workers for
particular sectors (China)
4Why knowledge and skills are importantOne
example Contributions of different factors to
economic growth
Source OECD
5Skill Intensity of the Economy Accelerating in
All Sectors
Knowledge and Management Occupations as a Share
of Total Employment, 1971-96 - Canada
6HRD and competitiveness
7Introduction
- Many countries are finding it difficult to reform
their national skills development system to deal
with the challenges of the global economy - Different innovations developed relate closely to
social, political and historical context in which
they were developed - English speaking countries focus on outcomes
- French speaking countries focus on process
- German speaking countries focus on occupations
8Introduction
- Most international approaches to skills
development focus on integrated national skills
strategies which develop the skills across the
total workforce, rather than segments, such as
high-skilled workers. This will be a feature of
the presentations of the international resource
persons - ILO/SKILLS-AP has brought international
approaches to skills development from Partner
Organizations in Australia, Germany, Republic of
Korea and Singapore to this Forum - This presentation will focus on a new trend in
skills development being implemented across many
advanced countries
9Sector-based approaches to skills development
10Sector-based approaches to skills development
- Background
- Many countries exploring new approaches to skills
- A demand-led approach to training is currently a
top priority in skills policies in many countries - This approach enables the coordinating agency to
determine the skill needs within a sector, the
kinds and level of training required and how such
training should be financed and delivered - This paper examines the lessons learnt from
countries which have adopted this approach.
11What is a sector approach to training?
- No precise definition nor single model in the six
countries which have declared sector approach as
a major workforce development structure - Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand,
South Africa and the UK (Singapore now included) - All systems differ in terms of scope
objectives funding, working relations with
educ/training and qualification authorities and
number of sectors - But all system have two main common features
- Existence of sector-based coordinating bodies
- Involvement of industry/employers in these bodies
12Why use sector-based approaches?
- Governments wanting to focus on the development
of particular economic sectors which provide the
best prospects for increasing international
market share, and developing skills for that
sector e.g. Singapore in biomedical science - Strengthen emerging sectors that have potential
for contributing to future economic growth - Linking skills development to the real economic
divisions in the country - As a mechanism to steer employers towards higher
value-added forms of productions - Ensuring more effective training delivery
13Six main features of an effective sector skills
approach
- An effective sector approach
- allows employers to have key role in identifying
demand for skills and designing the competencies
required - In the Netherlands, employers determine skills
needs and qualifications through Knowledge
Centres which ensure consistency between work-
and centre-based training - In Singapore, government uses major employers as
a model to identify skills needs of specific
industries - In Hong Kong SAR employers set up and finance
bodies to define and deliver the skills (textile
construction) - In UK, some problems emerged with employers
involvement as they were only consulted after
skills and qualifications were determined by
consultants
14Six main features of an effective sector skills
approach
- An effective sector approach
- secures the involvement of workers
- assists in transferability of skills across
labour market in the Netherlands, unions are
involved in identifying sector skills needs - maximizes the use of financial incentives
- Levy schemes in South Africa levy used to
establish training infrastructure in Netherlands
only small levy (0.5) used for specific skills
projects in Hong Kong SAR levy confined to 2
sectors in Singapore only for low skilled workers
15Six main features of an effective sector skills
approach
- An effective sector approach
- Maximizes the use of financial incentives (cont)
- direct government subsidies UK subsidies
trainees wages and shares cost of training with
companies the Netherlands provides tax refund
(15) of trainees wages - Uses government funding of sector skills bodies
to ensure that they consider longer term
government objectives - Danger that if sector councils are responsive
only to employers, longer term objectives may not
be considered - In Canada, uses funding to ensure that its views
on more general long-term policy are considered
In Singapore, government determines which parts
of economy will grow
16Six main features of an effective sector skills
approach
- An effective sector approach
- Ensures that some of the funds for public
training goes through employer-led skills
councils - In New Zealand funding is provided to Industry
Training Councils on per capita basis in the
Netherlands funds are tied to volume of training
provided in USA, Workforce Investment Act
success due to employer involvement In UK and
Australia some difficulties with councils limited
control of funding, and less responsive to
employers needs - Manages different interests between central
government and provinces/states/ regions - Difficult problem for federal systems with
differences between federal and state/provincial
needs e.g. Canada and Australia
17Implications for creating a responsive sector
system
- Ensure that the component parts of the system are
aligned to the same objectives - Governments may choose the sectors which relate
most closely to national objectives - Ensure that sector councils represent the real
divisions in the economy - Ensure clarity in functions of sector councils
- Ensure complementarity of research and labour
market information between coordinating body and
individual sector council - Ensure effective performance monitoring
18Concluding thoughts
- While no national systems can be directly
transferred to others, many useful lessons can be
learnt from observing other systems - This study has revealed key principles that drive
the most effective sector systems - Sector based approaches are proving to be very
effective in matching skills needs to national
economic development - Many advanced countries using sector based
approaches to develop their skills workforce and
respond to challenges of globalization