TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY EXPERIENCES IN THE DALLASFORT WORTH NONATTAINMENT AREA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY EXPERIENCES IN THE DALLASFORT WORTH NONATTAINMENT AREA

Description:

Proceed with U.S. Department of Transportation Conformity Determination ... Collection of Latest Available Data. Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEBs) Documentation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: mven3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY EXPERIENCES IN THE DALLASFORT WORTH NONATTAINMENT AREA


1
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY EXPERIENCES IN THE
DALLAS-FORT WORTH NONATTAINMENT AREA
  • Southern Transportation
  • Air Quality Summit

Madhusudhan Venugopal North Central Texas Council
of Governments
2
TRANSPORTATION CONFOMITYOverview
TRANSPORTATION CONFOMITYOverview
  • Background
  • State Implementation Plan (SIP)
  • Transportation Control Measures (TCM)
  • Modeling Parameters
  • Short and Long Range Plans
  • Regional Support
  • Current and Future Efforts

3
BACKGROUNDCriteria Pollutants
Carbon Monoxide (CO) Lead (Pb) Nitrogen Oxides
(NOx) Ozone (O3) Particulate Matter (PM10
PM2.5) Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Future ? CO2, NO2,
Etc.
4
BACKGROUNDHistory of Federal Air Quality
Standards
5
BACKGROUND8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area
6
BACKGROUND Conformity Determination History
7
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN1999 Nitrogen Oxides
(NOx) Emission Inventory
Area 34 tons(4)
Biogenic 52 tons(6)
Point 150 tons(18)
Non-Road Mobile 148 tons(18)
On-Road Mobile 438 tons(54)
8
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN2009 Nitrogen Oxides
(NOx) Emission Inventory
Area 44 tons
Point 61 tons
(10)
(13)
Biogenic 52 tons
(12)
On-Road Mobile 184
Non-Road Mobile 107
tons (41)
tons (24)
Source Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
9
TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES8-Hour SIP
10
TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURESIdentifying TCMs
Initial Commitment Summary Transportation
Improvement Program Review/Survey Coordination
with Implementing Agencies Double Check Database
Information (i.e. TIPINS, Studies, Etc.) Review
Large Projects (for Grade Separations,
Intersection Imp.) Final Update of Commitment
List Substitute Problematic Projects Forward
Revised Commitment Summary to State and Federal
Air Quality Conformity Partners
11
TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURESEnvironmental
Speed Limits
  • Environmental Speed Limits (ESL) are a Control
    Strategy in the 1-Hour State Implementation Plan
  • All Speed Limits Continue to be an Indirect
    Strategy in the 8-Hour SIP and Transportation
    Conformity
  • Speed Increases Above 35 mph Increase NOx
    Emissions

12
TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURESEnvironmental
Speed Limits
  • Implementing Agency to Notify NCTCOG
  • If an Environmental Speed Limit
  • NCTCOG to Identify Air Quality Impacts
  • Implementing Agency Identify Offset Emission
    Measures
  • If Impacts Are Greater Than Offsets, RTC
    Assistance
  • NCTCOG Initiate TCM Substitution Process
  • If NOT An Environmental Speed Limit
  • NCTCOG Incorporate Into Subsequent Transportation
    Conformity Analysis
  • If Emissions Are Greater Than SIP Motor Vehicle
    Emissions Budgets, Re-Evaluate
  • Proceed with U.S. Department of Transportation
    Conformity Determination

13
MODELING PARAMETERSFactors Affecting EF and VMT
  • Age Distribution
  • Diesel Fraction
  • Hourly VMT
  • Seasonal Adjustment Factors
  • Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS)
    Adjustment Factors
  • Non-Recurring Congestion Factor

14
MODELING PARAMETERSConsensus
  • Identify Data Used to Develop Parameters
  • Collection of Latest Available Data
  • Interagency Consultation Review
  • Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEBs)
  • Documentation

15
MODELING PARAMETERSHPMS Factor
  • 40 CFR 93.122(b)-(3) an HPMS adjustment factor
    may be developed to reconcile and calibrate the
    network-based travel model (e.g., TDM) estimates
    of VMT in the base year of its validation to the
    HPMS estimates for the same period.
  • Traffic Counts Used For Validation in the Model
  • VMT Increase/Decrease Over Time
  • Need for a Model Adjustment Factor

16
SHORT AND LONG RANGE PLANSProject Identification
  • Modeling and Non-Modeling Area
  • Project Staging Years
  • Consistency with MTP and TIP
  • Communication with State DOTs and Cities
  • Non-Modeling Area Project Listing Through
    Meetings

17
REGIONAL SUPPORTMSAT ANALYSIS
18
REGIONAL SUPPORTMSATs FHWA Recommended
Five-Percent Volume Change
19
REGIONAL SUPPORTMSATs Emissions Analysis by TSZ
20
CURRENT AND FUTURE EFFORTSIdeas
  • Visualization
  • Multi-Pollutant Approach
  • More Peer to Peer Communication
  • Streamlining Conformity Process
  • Web-Based Project Submission/Updates
  • Increased Communication with Cities on Project
    Status

21
CURRENT AND FUTURE EFFORTS Management and
Operations
22
CURRENT AND FUTURE EFFORTS Management and
Operations
23
CURRENT AND FUTURE EFFORTS Public Awareness
Campaign Elements

Campaign Web site www.airnorthtexas.org
24
1-HOUR OZONE HISTORICAL TRENDS
DFW Nonattainment Area
Highest Number of Exceedances at any Given Monitor
Attainment Goal
3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Consecutive 3-Year Periods
Attainment Goal - According to the US EPA
National Ambient Air Quality Standards,
attainment is reached when there are no more than
3 exceedances per monitor within a consecutive
3-year period. An exceedance occurs when the
ozone concentration 125 parts per billion
averaged over a one hour period.
Not a full year of data. Current as of July
2009
Source NCTCOG Transportation Dept
25
HISTORICAL TRENDS FOR 8-HOUR OZONE STANDARD
DFW Nonattainment Area
Highest Average at any Given Monitor (ppb)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1997 Standard lt 85 ppb
Revised Standard 75 ppb
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Consecutive 3-Year Periods
2010 Attainment Goal - According to the US EPA
National Ambient Air Quality Standards,
attainment is reached when, at each monitor, the
three-year average of the annual fourth-highest
daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration
is less than 85 parts per billion (ppb).
Source NCTCOG TR Dept
26
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITYContact Information
  • Madhusudhan Venugopal
  • Senior Transportation Planner
  • (817) 608-2333
  • mvenugopal_at_nctcog.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com