Multiple Care-of Address Registration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Multiple Care-of Address Registration

Description:

For the scenario on the left, MN learns L2 address of default router and ... flag is required to keep the state of MN's attachment to both home and foreign ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:16
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: wakikaw
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Multiple Care-of Address Registration


1
Multiple Care-of Address Registration
2
WGLC completed
  • WGLC for -05.txt.
  • After WGLC, we published -06.txt and
    pre07.txt(ML)
  • We did several editorial updates and applied
    received comments
  • Binding Unique Identifier is renamed to Binding
    Identifier
  • New Status Code MCOA NOTCOMPLETE, the home
    agent uses this status code in BA when not all
    the bindings are accepted in the bulk
    registration.
  • MCOA FLAG CONFLICTS are now merged with MCOA
    MALFORMED
  • Add care-of address verification issue in the
    Security Consideration, the text is proposed by
    Benjamin Lim.
  • Support DSMIPv6
  • Support simultaneous foreign and home location.
    (Section 5.5)

3
Remaining Issues
  • Sequence number for the bindings. Should we
    maintain the sequence number for each binding
    separately or not?
  • In the simultaneous home and visited link
    operation, how does the HA delete the state about
    forwarding packets to the mobile node's home
    address on the home link? When the does the state
    expire?
  • We added some text, but might require further
    discussion
  • On whether we should consider enhanced RO for
    this draft. Not sure if there are any issues

4
Sequence Number issue
  • MN manages an individual sequence value per
    binding. The problem is when MN changes the
    registration mode from individual to bulk. Which
    sequence number should be picked for BU?
  • MN should manage the single sequence value for
    all bindings.

5
Enhanced RO
  • MN can register its binding to CN with Return
    Routability procedure (RFC3775).
  • We need to investigate whether MCoA is compliant
    with the enhanced RO (RFC4886) or not.
  • We will get additional review

6
Simultaneous Home and Foreign attachment
  • HA intercepts all packets meant for MN and
    decides to send the traffic directly to HoA on
    the link or tunnel to CoA.
  • For the scenario on the left, MN learns L2
    address of default router and constructs outgoing
    packets w/out NDP. Likewise HA learns MNs L2
    address and delivers packets to MN w/out NDP.

7
Simultaneous Home and Foreign Attachments
  • MN sets the H flag in the BID option of the
    deregistration BU for the interface attached to
    the home link.
  • MN will know whether it can operate NDP or not by
    the status value in BA
  • MCOA RETURNHOME WO/NDP status code
  • While MN is attached to both home and foreign
    links, MN sends BU with H flag set in BID option
    for CoA.
  • When H flag is explicitly unset, the HA stops
    delivering packets to the HoA on the home link.
  • If all the bindings have expired for HoA, HA
    delivers all the packets to the HoA on the home
    link. (Returning home)
  • H flag is required to keep the state of MNs
    attachment to both home and foreign links at the
    home agent

8
Next Step
  • Will publish the updated version
  • draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-07.txt
  • second WGLC right after this IETF.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com