Title: Thermal
1Section 16 Thermal
Nicholas M. Teti EO-1 Thermal Systems Lead,
Swales Aerospace
2Contents
- Thermal Control System
- Performance Summary
- Thermal Analysis
- Thermal Balance Thermal Vacuum Testing
- Verification Matrix
- Configuration Changes
- RFA Status
- PR Status
- Report Status
- Residual Risk Items
- Readiness Statement
3Thermal Control System
- Passive Radiators
- Used on Spacecraft Equipment Panels 1, 2, 4 and 6
to radiate excess heat to space and maintain
overall bulk temperature of spacecraft - REGULATED CONDUCTIVE PATHS
- G-10 Isolators between Equipment (Battery) Panel
3 and S/C Structure - Maintain Battery 185C
- G-10 Isolators between PPT Mounting Plate and
Panel 6 - Louvers
- Used to Regulate Battery Equipment Panel 3
Temperature - TRMM spare with 10C Design (5-15C) -
calibrated by OSC
4Thermal Control System
- Multi-Layer Insulation (MLI)
- Built by Swales Aerospace
- 3 mil on Zenith Deck Equipment Panels
- 2 mil on Nadir Deck and HEA/CEA boxes
- Black Kapton on Nadir Deck below ALI FPA
Radiator - Battery Bay Enclosure - Aluminized Kapton
- Propulsion Tank
- Thermal Coatings
- Aeroglaze A276 White Paint
- Zenith Deck S-Band Antenna and SADA Actuator
Cover - Aeroglaze Z306 Black Paint
- Used on Nadir Deck S-Band Antenna
5Thermal Control System
- Carbon Carbon Radiator (CCR)
- Six Thermistors
- PSE and LEISA Electronics
- Pulse Plasma Thruster (PPT)
- G-10 Isolators between PPT Mounting Plate and
Panel 6 - Lightweight Flexible Solar Array (LFSA)
- G-10 Isolators between LFSA Electronics Box and
Zenith Deck - 2-mil Kapton on External LFSA Electronics Box
- Autonomous Star Tracker (AST)
- Design Verification during TB Testing
- Reduced Radiator Size w/ MLI added to Sun Shade
and AST Body -
6Thermal Control System
- Thermostatically Controlled Survival Heaters
- Used to maintain components above cold survival
limits - Primary and Secondary Circuits
- Redundant Thermostats
- Heater Sizing
- Science Mode lt 5 watts
- SafeHold Mode lt 20 watts
- CHOTHERM between electronic boxes and S/C
Equipment Panels - High emissivity coatings are used to enhance
internal radiation
7Thermal Control System
- Calorimeters
- Bracket mounted with mass simulators for TB and
TV Testing - Flight units not available for TB / TV Test
- Flight units delivered to project 3/8/00
- Z93 White Paint (GSFC)
- LA-II White Paint (AZ Technology)
- Propulsion Tank
- MLI blanket fabricated and installed
- Heater Verification completed during TV testing
8Thermal Control System
- ALI
- Maintain 200K Passive Radiator for Focal Plane
Assembly - Black Kapton On Nadir Deck in Front of FPA
Radiator - Passive Radiator for Focal Plane Electronics
- ALICE Box conductively coupled to Instrument
Pallet which is conductively coupled to the EO-1
Nadir Deck - Hyperion
- HSA Conductively Isolated from Spacecraft Nadir
Deck - CEA/HEA are Thermally Coupled to the Spacecraft
Nadir Deck - Atmospheric Corrector
- MLI Blanket Provided by Swales
- Conductively mounted to Spacecraft Nadir Deck
9Instrument Thermal Requirements
- Advanced Land Imager (ALI) Interface
- No thermal isolation between Instrument Shroud
Instrument Pallet - No thermal isolation between Instrument Pallet
and S/C Nadir Deck - Bolted Interface
- DeltaT 10C to 20C between Nadir Deck and
Instrument Interface - Hyperion Interface
- Energy transferred from Hyperion Instrument
Mounting Plate to the Nadir Deck shall be
regulated to maintain the Nadir Deck upper limit
temperature below 40C during all phases of the
mission. - NMP Technology Interface
- Energy Transfer at Spacecraft Interface /- 5
watts
10Thermal Analysis
ALI FPA Radiator
Bay 4 Radiator
Thermal Models updated and correlated based on
spacecraft Thermal Balance Test Results. No
significant changes required.
Louver
11Thermal Design Verification
Predictions vs. Design Maximum
DCE Orbit - Hot Case
Model Correlation
TC Thermocouple
12Thermal Design Verification (continued)
Predictions vs. Design Minimum
SAFEHOLD - Cold Case
Model Correlation
TC Thermocouple
13Thermal Design Verification Summary
- Thermal Balance Test
- Critical spacecraft components within 5C of
thermal model predictions - Thermal design goals met with margin
- Radiator areas verified
- NiCd Battery thermal design verified
- Autonomous Star Tracker thermal design verified
- ALI instrument performed as designed
- Hyperion instrument performed as designed
- Atmospheric Corrector instrument performed a
designed - NMP Technologies performed as designed
TC Thermocouple
14Thermal Verification Plan
EO-1 Verification Plan (SAI-SPEC-158) and
Environmental Specification
- Thermal-vacuum testing of protoflight and flight
components and spares shall be performed to
demonstrate satisfactory operation in
representative functional modes at mission
operating temperatures, at temperatures in excess
of the extremes predicted for the mission, and
during temperature transitions. Protoflight
components shall be tested in a non-operational
mode at cold and hot limits to demonstrate that
permanent degradation will not result from
exposure to survival mode temperatures defined
for the EO-1 mission. In addition, for
components able to be powered at low temperature
survival heater settings, the protoflight and
flight units shall be tested in a powered mode to
demonstrate operation without degradation,
although the component need not meet its
performance specification until the operational
test limit is reached. - Components shall be subjected to a minimum of 4
hot-cold cycles with the hot temperature at 10C
above the maximum operating predictions and the
cold temperature 10C below the minimum operating
predictions. Where the temperature of an area is
controlled by a verified active thermal control
system (such as thermostatically controlled
heaters), the margin may be reduced to 5C. - The test duration shall be based on the time
required to perform performance/functional
testing of the component at each hot and cold
temperature plateau but, as a minimum, two-hour
soak periods shall be conducted. Components
shall be operated during the transition times and
turn-on demonstrations shall be made at both cold
and hot extremes. - Components that are powered during the Delta II
vehicle launch phase shall be operated during
test chamber pump down and venting to ambient to
verify performance.
15Spacecraft Level Testing
- Spacecraft Level
- Four cycles of Thermal Vacuum Testing
- Thermal Balance Test
- Hot Balance (Data Collection Event)
- Cold Balance (Safe Hold)
- Cold Balance (Standby)
- Spacecraft thermal control system performed
nominally - Post Test Correlation within 5C
- Spacecraft Hardware
- Thermal Louver calibrated by OSC
- Heaters are NASA Standard Parts (S-311-79)
- Thermostats are NASA Standard Parts (S-311-429)
- Thermistors are NASA Standard Parts (S-311-P18)
- Heater/Thermostat Circuits
- Verified using CO2 cold spray during IT
- Verified during Thermal Vacuum Testing
16Thermal Requirements
5C
40C
Qualification Test Limits (Operating)
Heater Controlled
- Set to 5C for primary heater circuits having
gt75 duty cycle
35C
5C
Acceptance Test Limits
30C
10C
Flight Prediction/Design Range
Operational Heater Control (includes safehold)
17(No Transcript)
18Box Level Testing
Safehold
19Instrument Level Testing
- Advanced Land Imager
- Four operating cycles One survival cycle of TV
Testing - Thermal Balance Test Analysis for ALICE Box
- Hyperion
- Four operating cycles One survival cycle of TV
Testing - Thermal Balance Test at nominal hot and cold
operating temperatures - Atmospheric Corrector
- Four survival cycles of TV Testing
- Four operating cycles
20Verification Matrix
21Accumulated Power On Time for EO-1 S/C
Components
22Post TV/TB Test Configuration Changes
- Equipment Panel 1 Radiator
- Reduced radiator size to decrease heater power
duty cycle - Replaced Nadir Deck Heaters
- Autonomous Star Tracker
- Prior to TB/TV spacecraft testing, radiator size
was modified to correct error in vendor modeling
and design - Added Multi-Layer Insulating blankets around
entire AST shade
23Technical Peer Reviews
- PDR, CDR, Confirmation Review
- Thermal Peer Review (6/98)
- Delta-Thermal Critical Design Review (10/21/98)
- Thermal Subsystem Readiness Review (9/24/99)
- Pre-Environmental Review (10/1/99)
- Pre-Ship Review (12/15/99)
- No Open RFAs as a result of Reviews
24Mission CDR RFAs
- RFA 4.31
- Perform transient spacecraft thermal analysis for
all EO-1 mission modes. - Thermal Analysis Complete for Launch, Ascent,
DCE, Standby and Safemode - RFA 4.33
- Perform thermal design and analysis of solar
array deployment mechanisms, including HOP
restraint/release, dampers and hinges. - Thermal analysis completed for HOPS and Dampers.
The HOPS are contained in an MLI enclosure. The
dampers have thermostatically controlled heaters
and are enclosed with MLI. - RFA 4.34
- Integrate reduced thermal mathematical model of
the ALI in SINDA format into the spaceraft
mathematical model and perform integrated
analysis. - The ALI, Hyperion, Atmospheric Corrector and NMP
technologies have been integrated with the
spacecraft models and analyzed.
25S/C CDR RFA 4.36
- Consider providing a breadboard to the IRU vendor
for demonstration of the 1/4 C temperature
control stability - Background
- At the time of the S/C CDR, the temperature
control of the gyro internal platform was to be
hosted on the S/C side of the interface - Within a month later, Litton GC, the IRU vendor,
accepted an ICD change in this regard since an
internal heater control module had been developed
for another program and was already to be
included in the SIRU design used by EO-1 - Response to RFA
- Due to the change an the IRU ICD, the concern
raised by the RFA was retired and no breadboard
was needed by Litton GC - IRU temperature stability based on the input bus
voltage only was verified during IRU Acceptance
Testing and continues to be verified during S/C
IT as part of IRU performance tests
26PSR RFA Status
- RFA 14.22
- Completed
- RFA 14.23
- Completed
- RFA 14.24
- Completed
27RFA 14.22
- SPECIFIC REQUEST Provide or include in the
January PSR a temperature sensitive component
tabular listing which included the following
information - Thermal design minimum / maximum power
dissipation range - Actual measured/derived power dissipation
- Hot / Cold /Safehold thermal correlation
temperature differences - Demonstrated heater margins
- SUPPORTING RATIONALE This information is
normally contained in a Pre-Ship Review Package. - PROJECT RESPONSE
- A chart was presented showing the thermal design
min/max power dissipations provided by the EO-1
spacecraft systems. - A spreadsheet showing the transient measured
power for the EO-1 electronics that was verified
during thermal balance and thermal vacuum
testing. The only change was for the SADA during
Safehold. The SADA dissipation remains 11.86
during safehold. In addition, 1 watt power loss
was added to the cable wrap during the sunlit
portions of the mission - Correlated Data was provided for Hot DCE Orbit,
Cold Standby and Safehold Cold Thermal Balance - Heater Duty Cycles provided.
28RFA 14.22
29RFA 14.23
- SPECIFIC REQUEST Provide or include in the
January PSR a component tabular listing which
includes the following information - Temperature requirements
- Flight Cold and Hot temperature predicts
- Qualification test history for each temperature
sensitive component. - Distinguish between subsystem and observatory
testing and provide information in terms of
temperatures achieved and number of cycles. - SUPPORTING RATIONALE This information is
normally in a Pre-Ship Review Package. - PROJECT RESPONSE TO PSR RFA 14.23 Charts
provided with requested data.
30RFA 14.23 (continued)
Predictions vs. Design Maximum
DCE Orbit - Hot Case
Model Correlation
TC Thermocouple
31RFA 14.23 (continued)
Predictions vs. Design Minimum
SAFEHOLD - Cold Case
Model Correlation
TC Thermocouple
32RFA 14.23 (continued)
Safehold
33RFA 14.23 (continued)
Heater Duty Cycle for DCE and Standby Cases -
Cold Bias
34RFA 14.23 (continued)
Heater Duty Cycle for Safehold Case - Cold Bias
35RFA 14.24
- SPECIFIC REQUEST Assure that adequate launch
site thermal subsystem inspections occur prior to
launch. Verify that the inspection process is
sound. - SUPPORTING RATIONALE Pre-Thermal-Vacuum Test
inspections were not adequate since a test
blanket hung up on the solar array actuator. - PROJECT RESPONSE
- Nick Teti will be at launch site to perform final
inspection of the thermal control subsystem. In
addition to items identified in SAI-PROC-757,
EO-1 Satellite Red Tag Item Removal and
Installation Procedure, a Work Order
Authorization (WOA) will be written to identify
all remaining closeouts for the EO-1 thermal
control systems, this includes but is not limited
to, blanket closeouts, louver installation, final
taping. WOAs are reviewed and verified by the
appropriate personnel. - The test blanket interference during thermal
vacuum was a unique configuration that will NOT
be part of the launch configuration. A camera was
placed at the location of the solar array to
monitor the movement within the blanket enclosure
recognizing the possibility of interference.
Several tests were run prior to the start of the
thermal vacuum test to verify proper clearance.
The camera provided an opportunity to monitor the
solar array drive and if an anomaly were observed
the solar array movement would be halted
36Report Status
- Thermal Balance / Thermal Vacuum Final Report
(SAI-RPT-319) - Completed
- Thermal Design and Analysis Final Report
(SAI-RPT-322) - 3/31/00
- Thermal Interface Control Document -
(SAI-ICD-048, Rev B) - 4/15/00
37Residual Risk Items
- None
- No Redbook candidates
PR Status
38Readiness Statement
- On-Orbit thermal model updated based on results
of TB Testing - Thermal Analysis Complete
- Launch/Ascent
- DCE
- Standby
- Safemode
- No Open PRs
- Blanket closeouts are to be completed prior to
shipment - Documents scheduled for completion prior to
shipment - THERMAL SUBSYSTEM IS READY FOR SHIPMENT !