Thermal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Thermal

Description:

Autonomous Star Tracker ... A chart was presented showing the thermal design min ... PROJECT RESPONSE TO PSR RFA #14.23: Charts provided with requested data. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: nicktet
Category:
Tags: charts | star | thermal

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Thermal


1
Section 16 Thermal
Nicholas M. Teti EO-1 Thermal Systems Lead,
Swales Aerospace
2
Contents
  • Thermal Control System
  • Performance Summary
  • Thermal Analysis
  • Thermal Balance Thermal Vacuum Testing
  • Verification Matrix
  • Configuration Changes
  • RFA Status
  • PR Status
  • Report Status
  • Residual Risk Items
  • Readiness Statement

3
Thermal Control System
  • Passive Radiators
  • Used on Spacecraft Equipment Panels 1, 2, 4 and 6
    to radiate excess heat to space and maintain
    overall bulk temperature of spacecraft
  • REGULATED CONDUCTIVE PATHS
  • G-10 Isolators between Equipment (Battery) Panel
    3 and S/C Structure
  • Maintain Battery 185C
  • G-10 Isolators between PPT Mounting Plate and
    Panel 6
  • Louvers
  • Used to Regulate Battery Equipment Panel 3
    Temperature
  • TRMM spare with 10C Design (5-15C) -
    calibrated by OSC

4
Thermal Control System
  • Multi-Layer Insulation (MLI)
  • Built by Swales Aerospace
  • 3 mil on Zenith Deck Equipment Panels
  • 2 mil on Nadir Deck and HEA/CEA boxes
  • Black Kapton on Nadir Deck below ALI FPA
    Radiator
  • Battery Bay Enclosure - Aluminized Kapton
  • Propulsion Tank
  • Thermal Coatings
  • Aeroglaze A276 White Paint
  • Zenith Deck S-Band Antenna and SADA Actuator
    Cover
  • Aeroglaze Z306 Black Paint
  • Used on Nadir Deck S-Band Antenna

5
Thermal Control System
  • Carbon Carbon Radiator (CCR)
  • Six Thermistors
  • PSE and LEISA Electronics
  • Pulse Plasma Thruster (PPT)
  • G-10 Isolators between PPT Mounting Plate and
    Panel 6
  • Lightweight Flexible Solar Array (LFSA)
  • G-10 Isolators between LFSA Electronics Box and
    Zenith Deck
  • 2-mil Kapton on External LFSA Electronics Box
  • Autonomous Star Tracker (AST)
  • Design Verification during TB Testing
  • Reduced Radiator Size w/ MLI added to Sun Shade
    and AST Body

6
Thermal Control System
  • Thermostatically Controlled Survival Heaters
  • Used to maintain components above cold survival
    limits
  • Primary and Secondary Circuits
  • Redundant Thermostats
  • Heater Sizing
  • Science Mode lt 5 watts
  • SafeHold Mode lt 20 watts
  • CHOTHERM between electronic boxes and S/C
    Equipment Panels
  • High emissivity coatings are used to enhance
    internal radiation

7
Thermal Control System
  • Calorimeters
  • Bracket mounted with mass simulators for TB and
    TV Testing
  • Flight units not available for TB / TV Test
  • Flight units delivered to project 3/8/00
  • Z93 White Paint (GSFC)
  • LA-II White Paint (AZ Technology)
  • Propulsion Tank
  • MLI blanket fabricated and installed
  • Heater Verification completed during TV testing

8
Thermal Control System
  • ALI
  • Maintain 200K Passive Radiator for Focal Plane
    Assembly
  • Black Kapton On Nadir Deck in Front of FPA
    Radiator
  • Passive Radiator for Focal Plane Electronics
  • ALICE Box conductively coupled to Instrument
    Pallet which is conductively coupled to the EO-1
    Nadir Deck
  • Hyperion
  • HSA Conductively Isolated from Spacecraft Nadir
    Deck
  • CEA/HEA are Thermally Coupled to the Spacecraft
    Nadir Deck
  • Atmospheric Corrector
  • MLI Blanket Provided by Swales
  • Conductively mounted to Spacecraft Nadir Deck

9
Instrument Thermal Requirements
  • Advanced Land Imager (ALI) Interface
  • No thermal isolation between Instrument Shroud
    Instrument Pallet
  • No thermal isolation between Instrument Pallet
    and S/C Nadir Deck
  • Bolted Interface
  • DeltaT 10C to 20C between Nadir Deck and
    Instrument Interface
  • Hyperion Interface
  • Energy transferred from Hyperion Instrument
    Mounting Plate to the Nadir Deck shall be
    regulated to maintain the Nadir Deck upper limit
    temperature below 40C during all phases of the
    mission.
  • NMP Technology Interface
  • Energy Transfer at Spacecraft Interface /- 5
    watts

10
Thermal Analysis
ALI FPA Radiator
Bay 4 Radiator
Thermal Models updated and correlated based on
spacecraft Thermal Balance Test Results. No
significant changes required.
Louver
11
Thermal Design Verification
Predictions vs. Design Maximum
DCE Orbit - Hot Case
Model Correlation
TC Thermocouple
12
Thermal Design Verification (continued)
Predictions vs. Design Minimum
SAFEHOLD - Cold Case
Model Correlation
TC Thermocouple
13
Thermal Design Verification Summary
  • Thermal Balance Test
  • Critical spacecraft components within 5C of
    thermal model predictions
  • Thermal design goals met with margin
  • Radiator areas verified
  • NiCd Battery thermal design verified
  • Autonomous Star Tracker thermal design verified
  • ALI instrument performed as designed
  • Hyperion instrument performed as designed
  • Atmospheric Corrector instrument performed a
    designed
  • NMP Technologies performed as designed

TC Thermocouple
14
Thermal Verification Plan
EO-1 Verification Plan (SAI-SPEC-158) and
Environmental Specification
  • Thermal-vacuum testing of protoflight and flight
    components and spares shall be performed to
    demonstrate satisfactory operation in
    representative functional modes at mission
    operating temperatures, at temperatures in excess
    of the extremes predicted for the mission, and
    during temperature transitions. Protoflight
    components shall be tested in a non-operational
    mode at cold and hot limits to demonstrate that
    permanent degradation will not result from
    exposure to survival mode temperatures defined
    for the EO-1 mission. In addition, for
    components able to be powered at low temperature
    survival heater settings, the protoflight and
    flight units shall be tested in a powered mode to
    demonstrate operation without degradation,
    although the component need not meet its
    performance specification until the operational
    test limit is reached.
  • Components shall be subjected to a minimum of 4
    hot-cold cycles with the hot temperature at 10C
    above the maximum operating predictions and the
    cold temperature 10C below the minimum operating
    predictions. Where the temperature of an area is
    controlled by a verified active thermal control
    system (such as thermostatically controlled
    heaters), the margin may be reduced to 5C.
  • The test duration shall be based on the time
    required to perform performance/functional
    testing of the component at each hot and cold
    temperature plateau but, as a minimum, two-hour
    soak periods shall be conducted. Components
    shall be operated during the transition times and
    turn-on demonstrations shall be made at both cold
    and hot extremes.
  • Components that are powered during the Delta II
    vehicle launch phase shall be operated during
    test chamber pump down and venting to ambient to
    verify performance.

15
Spacecraft Level Testing
  • Spacecraft Level
  • Four cycles of Thermal Vacuum Testing
  • Thermal Balance Test
  • Hot Balance (Data Collection Event)
  • Cold Balance (Safe Hold)
  • Cold Balance (Standby)
  • Spacecraft thermal control system performed
    nominally
  • Post Test Correlation within 5C
  • Spacecraft Hardware
  • Thermal Louver calibrated by OSC
  • Heaters are NASA Standard Parts (S-311-79)
  • Thermostats are NASA Standard Parts (S-311-429)
  • Thermistors are NASA Standard Parts (S-311-P18)
  • Heater/Thermostat Circuits
  • Verified using CO2 cold spray during IT
  • Verified during Thermal Vacuum Testing

16
Thermal Requirements
5C
40C
Qualification Test Limits (Operating)
Heater Controlled
- Set to 5C for primary heater circuits having
gt75 duty cycle
35C
5C
Acceptance Test Limits
30C
10C
Flight Prediction/Design Range
Operational Heater Control (includes safehold)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Box Level Testing
Safehold
19
Instrument Level Testing
  • Advanced Land Imager
  • Four operating cycles One survival cycle of TV
    Testing
  • Thermal Balance Test Analysis for ALICE Box
  • Hyperion
  • Four operating cycles One survival cycle of TV
    Testing
  • Thermal Balance Test at nominal hot and cold
    operating temperatures
  • Atmospheric Corrector
  • Four survival cycles of TV Testing
  • Four operating cycles

20
Verification Matrix
21
Accumulated Power On Time for EO-1 S/C
Components
22
Post TV/TB Test Configuration Changes
  • Equipment Panel 1 Radiator
  • Reduced radiator size to decrease heater power
    duty cycle
  • Replaced Nadir Deck Heaters
  • Autonomous Star Tracker
  • Prior to TB/TV spacecraft testing, radiator size
    was modified to correct error in vendor modeling
    and design
  • Added Multi-Layer Insulating blankets around
    entire AST shade

23
Technical Peer Reviews
  • PDR, CDR, Confirmation Review
  • Thermal Peer Review (6/98)
  • Delta-Thermal Critical Design Review (10/21/98)
  • Thermal Subsystem Readiness Review (9/24/99)
  • Pre-Environmental Review (10/1/99)
  • Pre-Ship Review (12/15/99)
  • No Open RFAs as a result of Reviews

24
Mission CDR RFAs
  • RFA 4.31
  • Perform transient spacecraft thermal analysis for
    all EO-1 mission modes.
  • Thermal Analysis Complete for Launch, Ascent,
    DCE, Standby and Safemode
  • RFA 4.33
  • Perform thermal design and analysis of solar
    array deployment mechanisms, including HOP
    restraint/release, dampers and hinges.
  • Thermal analysis completed for HOPS and Dampers.
    The HOPS are contained in an MLI enclosure. The
    dampers have thermostatically controlled heaters
    and are enclosed with MLI.
  • RFA 4.34
  • Integrate reduced thermal mathematical model of
    the ALI in SINDA format into the spaceraft
    mathematical model and perform integrated
    analysis.
  • The ALI, Hyperion, Atmospheric Corrector and NMP
    technologies have been integrated with the
    spacecraft models and analyzed.

25
S/C CDR RFA 4.36
  • Consider providing a breadboard to the IRU vendor
    for demonstration of the 1/4 C temperature
    control stability
  • Background
  • At the time of the S/C CDR, the temperature
    control of the gyro internal platform was to be
    hosted on the S/C side of the interface
  • Within a month later, Litton GC, the IRU vendor,
    accepted an ICD change in this regard since an
    internal heater control module had been developed
    for another program and was already to be
    included in the SIRU design used by EO-1
  • Response to RFA
  • Due to the change an the IRU ICD, the concern
    raised by the RFA was retired and no breadboard
    was needed by Litton GC
  • IRU temperature stability based on the input bus
    voltage only was verified during IRU Acceptance
    Testing and continues to be verified during S/C
    IT as part of IRU performance tests

26
PSR RFA Status
  • RFA 14.22
  • Completed
  • RFA 14.23
  • Completed
  • RFA 14.24
  • Completed

27
RFA 14.22
  • SPECIFIC REQUEST Provide or include in the
    January PSR a temperature sensitive component
    tabular listing which included the following
    information
  • Thermal design minimum / maximum power
    dissipation range
  • Actual measured/derived power dissipation
  • Hot / Cold /Safehold thermal correlation
    temperature differences
  • Demonstrated heater margins
  • SUPPORTING RATIONALE This information is
    normally contained in a Pre-Ship Review Package.
  • PROJECT RESPONSE
  • A chart was presented showing the thermal design
    min/max power dissipations provided by the EO-1
    spacecraft systems.
  • A spreadsheet showing the transient measured
    power for the EO-1 electronics that was verified
    during thermal balance and thermal vacuum
    testing. The only change was for the SADA during
    Safehold. The SADA dissipation remains 11.86
    during safehold. In addition, 1 watt power loss
    was added to the cable wrap during the sunlit
    portions of the mission
  • Correlated Data was provided for Hot DCE Orbit,
    Cold Standby and Safehold Cold Thermal Balance
  • Heater Duty Cycles provided.

28
RFA 14.22
29
RFA 14.23
  • SPECIFIC REQUEST Provide or include in the
    January PSR a component tabular listing which
    includes the following information
  • Temperature requirements
  • Flight Cold and Hot temperature predicts
  • Qualification test history for each temperature
    sensitive component.
  • Distinguish between subsystem and observatory
    testing and provide information in terms of
    temperatures achieved and number of cycles.
  • SUPPORTING RATIONALE This information is
    normally in a Pre-Ship Review Package.
  • PROJECT RESPONSE TO PSR RFA 14.23 Charts
    provided with requested data.

30
RFA 14.23 (continued)
Predictions vs. Design Maximum
DCE Orbit - Hot Case
Model Correlation
TC Thermocouple
31
RFA 14.23 (continued)
Predictions vs. Design Minimum
SAFEHOLD - Cold Case
Model Correlation
TC Thermocouple
32
RFA 14.23 (continued)
Safehold
33
RFA 14.23 (continued)
Heater Duty Cycle for DCE and Standby Cases -
Cold Bias
34
RFA 14.23 (continued)
Heater Duty Cycle for Safehold Case - Cold Bias
35
RFA 14.24
  • SPECIFIC REQUEST Assure that adequate launch
    site thermal subsystem inspections occur prior to
    launch. Verify that the inspection process is
    sound.
  • SUPPORTING RATIONALE Pre-Thermal-Vacuum Test
    inspections were not adequate since a test
    blanket hung up on the solar array actuator.
  • PROJECT RESPONSE
  • Nick Teti will be at launch site to perform final
    inspection of the thermal control subsystem. In
    addition to items identified in SAI-PROC-757,
    EO-1 Satellite Red Tag Item Removal and
    Installation Procedure, a Work Order
    Authorization (WOA) will be written to identify
    all remaining closeouts for the EO-1 thermal
    control systems, this includes but is not limited
    to, blanket closeouts, louver installation, final
    taping. WOAs are reviewed and verified by the
    appropriate personnel.
  • The test blanket interference during thermal
    vacuum was a unique configuration that will NOT
    be part of the launch configuration. A camera was
    placed at the location of the solar array to
    monitor the movement within the blanket enclosure
    recognizing the possibility of interference.
    Several tests were run prior to the start of the
    thermal vacuum test to verify proper clearance.
    The camera provided an opportunity to monitor the
    solar array drive and if an anomaly were observed
    the solar array movement would be halted

36
Report Status
  • Thermal Balance / Thermal Vacuum Final Report
    (SAI-RPT-319)
  • Completed
  • Thermal Design and Analysis Final Report
    (SAI-RPT-322)
  • 3/31/00
  • Thermal Interface Control Document -
    (SAI-ICD-048, Rev B)
  • 4/15/00

37
Residual Risk Items
  • None
  • No Redbook candidates

PR Status
  • No OPEN PRs

38
Readiness Statement
  • On-Orbit thermal model updated based on results
    of TB Testing
  • Thermal Analysis Complete
  • Launch/Ascent
  • DCE
  • Standby
  • Safemode
  • No Open PRs
  • Blanket closeouts are to be completed prior to
    shipment
  • Documents scheduled for completion prior to
    shipment
  • THERMAL SUBSYSTEM IS READY FOR SHIPMENT !
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com