Numerical modeling of magnetic stardisk interaction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Numerical modeling of magnetic stardisk interaction

Description:

Numerical modeling of magnetic star-disk interaction. Claudio Zanni (LAOG Grenoble) ... gradient determines mass loading and slows down matter fall towards the star ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: marceli6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Numerical modeling of magnetic stardisk interaction


1
Numerical modeling of magnetic star-disk
interaction
  • Claudio Zanni (LAOG Grenoble)
  • Sauze DOulx JETSET School 2007

2
Outline
  • Observational evidences for magnetospheric
    accretion
  • Magnetic fields, accretion speeds, accretion
    shocks
  • MHD numerical simulations of a stellar (dipolar)
    magnetosphere interaction with an accretion disk
  • 2.5D simulations performed with the PLUTO code
  • Resistive and viscous simulations
  • Physics of magnetically controlled accretion
  • Accretion rates, funnel flow dynamics
  • Stellar spin down
  • Disk locking
  • Some annoying problems

3
Observational evidences
  • CTTSs have dynamically important surface
    magnetic fields B 1-3 kG (Valenti
    Johns-Krull 2004)
  • Redshifted absorption features in inverse
    P-Cygni profiles of H?-? lines reveal accreting
    material at free-fall speed (gt 100 km s-1)
    (Edwards et al. 1994)
  • Hot spots can be inferred from photometric and
    colour variability (Bouvier et al. 1995)
  • Rotational modulation of light curves suggests
    star rotation periods around 3-10d (Bouvier et
    al. 1993) origin of stellar spin-down?
  • Accretion disk is truncated at a few stellar
    radii by the interaction with the (dipolar)
    stellar magnetosphere.
  • The flow is channelled into funnel flows
    terminating with an accretion shock on the star
    surface.

4
(Astro)physical scenario
  • Perfectly conducting star of mass M rotating
    with ? angular speed connected through a closed
    dipolar field with a Keplarian disk
  • Corotation radius Rco
  • Truncation radius Rin
  • correlated (?) with the magnetospheric radius
    Rm
  • where
  • External radius Rout
  • disk disconnected from the star field
    lines open

(Matt Pudritz 2004)
5
A couple of caveats
  • Generally surface magnetic fields have no
    dipolar topology dipolar component should be
    weaker ( 100 G)

(Jardine et al. 2006)
  • Photometric and spectroscopic variations of AA
    Tau determined by periodic occultations of a disk
    warped by the interaction with an inclined
    dipolar magnetosphere intrinsically 3D problem

(Bouvier et al. 1999, 2003)
6
2.5D simulations initial conditions
  • Dipolar field aligned with the rotation axis of
    the star
  • Field in equipartition with the thermal
  • pressure of the disk
  • at the initial truncation radius Rin 3.7 R

B 150 (300) G
  • Resistive (viscous) Keplerian (accretion) disk
  • Resistivity (?
    1)
  • star perfect conductor rotating at ? 0.1?k
    (Rco 4.6 R)
  • Boundary condition on the magnetic torque
    adv terms
  • ----
  • Alfven crossing time of one grid cell

7
A couple of movies
  • As seen in 3D
  • In 2.5 dimensions

8
Resistive simulations
1.5 P
Rin
Rco
  • Large fraction of the disk beyond Rco still
    connected to the star
  • After 2 star periods 80 of the initial mass
    below Rco has been accreted
  • Need an additional mechanism to remove angular
    momentum from the disk to cross the centrifugal
    barrier beyond Rco VISCOUS
    TORQUE

9
Introducing viscosity (1)
  • In standard ? Keplerian accretion disks sign of
    the viscous torque on the midplane is (generally)
    positive matter is ejected on the midplane!

Conservation of mass and angular momentum
? viscosity
Radial speed on the midplane
10
Introducing viscosity (2)
  • Proposed solution high ? with all the
    components of viscous stress tensor

? 0.4
? 0.7
?cr 0.685
(Kluzniak Kita 1997)
  • There is a critical ? below which matter is
    ejected along the midplane
  • For an adiabatic disk ?cr 0.685

11
Resistive Viscous simulations
1.5 P
2.5 P
  • ?v 1 ensures accretion all across the disk (
    )
  • At 2.5 P first indication of an oscillating
    truncation radius and variable accretion rate

12
Mass accretion rates
  • Accretion at all radii (at least at longer
    timescale)
  • Mass accretion rate variable both in space and
    in time
  • Spatial oscillations of accretion rate due to
    the different local combination of magnetic and
    viscous torques
  • Truncation radius Rin changes position

13
Disk truncation
  • Disk truncated where
  • Such a field represents a magnetic wall for a
    subsonic accretion flow
  • Pram ? vr2 lt Pth
  • A field in equipartion with the rotational
    energy of the disk (B 1kG, as in Romanova et
    al.) can support free-fall
  • a weaker dipolar field (B 100 G) can
    truncate the disk

14
Funnel flow dynamics
rPth
?v?/r
Fkin
Fmag
FLorentz
?ggrav
  • Thermal pressure gradient uplifts matter at Rin
    into the funnel flow and slows down matter fall
  • Centrifugal barrier always negligible
    matter is braked along funnel flow
  • Transport of angular momentum dominated by
    advection (Fkin r?V?Vp) at the base of the
    funnel and by magnetic torque (Fmag rB?Bp) at
    the star surface

15
Stellar spin down
Jmag
  • Magnetic torque dominant on the surface of the
    star
  • Total magnetic torque sligthly slows down star
    rotation
  • Estimated braking time 108 yrs (our star is
    already slowly rotating)

Jkin
Jmag, disk
  • Braking torque associated with the fieldlines
    still connected to the disk is negligible
  • need to properly model (accretion
    powered?) stellar winds !!!

16
An annoying problem
2.5 P
1 P
  • Torque correctly changes sign at Rco
  • Disk accelerated (star braked) down to Rin?
  • Problem of (numerical) diffusion of the
    accretion column across the field lines?

17
which is not just my problem
Rco
Rco
(Long et al. 2005)
  • (Magnetic) transfer of angular momentum from the
    star to the disk below Rco

18
Summary
  • Magnetically controlled star-disk interaction
  • Resistivity introduced to control the magnetic
    star-disk coupling
  • Viscous stresses introduced to allow accretion
    beyond Rco
  • Not the only possible solution reconnection
    X-winds
  • Accretion process variable both in time and space
  • Accretion column dynamics
  • Thermal pressure gradient determines mass loading
    and slows down matter fall towards the star
  • Magnetic torque brakes the accreting material
  • Stellar spin down
  • Weak braking torque observed but the braking
    torque associated with the disk is negligible

19
Perspectives
  • Try to solve the problem of the sign of the
    torque below corotation
  • Parameter space study ?m, ?v, ?, B
  • Properly model the (accretion powered) stellar
    wind
  • 3D simulations inclined dipole, non-axisymmetric
    accretion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com