Limits on the Lifetime Difference DG of Neutral B Mesons and CP, T, and CPT Violation in B0B0 mixing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Limits on the Lifetime Difference DG of Neutral B Mesons and CP, T, and CPT Violation in B0B0 mixing

Description:

CP, T, and CPT Violation in B0B0 mixing. Wouter Verkerke (UC Santa Barbara) ... look at correction to na ve' mixing picture: CP/T/CPT violation in B0B0 mixing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: verk151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Limits on the Lifetime Difference DG of Neutral B Mesons and CP, T, and CPT Violation in B0B0 mixing


1
Limits on the Lifetime Difference DG of Neutral
B Mesons andCP, T, and CPT Violation in B0B0
mixing
  • Wouter Verkerke (UC Santa Barbara) for the BaBar
    collaboration

EPS2003 July 17-23 Aachen, Germany
2
Introduction Flavor mixing in the Bd system
  • Mass states BL, BH superposition of B0 and B0
    flavor states
  • Properties of the system

IfCPT holds
Oscillation frequency
Well measured
Average life time
Well measured
NOT well measured
Life time difference
3
Introduction CP,T,CPT violation in B0B0 mixing
  • Increasing statistics of B factories ? precision
    measurements look at correction to naïve
    mixing picture CP/T/CPT violation in B0B0 mixing

1)
CPT violation
CP and CPT violation
? 0
Violated in mixing if
Locality ? CPT invariance (e.g SM 0)
2)
CP/T violation
CP and T violation
SMsmall
Violated in mixing if
3)
SM small ?
Life time difference DG
Usually assumed to be 0..
Best limit sofar DG/G lt 18 (90 CL)
Eur. Phys. J. C 28 (2003) 155-173
  • Effect and magnitude on B decay rate measurement
    similar
  • Need combined analysis to disentangle effects

4
Coherent Time Evolution at the Y(4S)
PEP-II (SLAC)
B-Flavor Tagging
Exclusive B Meson Reconstruction
Vertexing Time DifferenceDetermination
5
Time dependent B decay rates naïve mixing picture
Differential event rate, as a function of the
difference between the proper decay times of
the two B mesons in the final state
Assume DG 0, no CP/T/CPT violation
Oscillations with frequency Dm
Exp. Decay
Decay time distributions
Mixed Unmixed Mixed Unmixed
ftag ? frec (unmixed)
ftag frec (mixed)
Asymmetry
Decay rate
Decay rate
-15 0 15
Dt (ps)
-15 0 15
Dt (ps)
-15 0 15
Dt (ps)
6
Time dependent B decay rates allowing DG?0,
CP/T/CPT violation
Full expression much more complicated
Allow DG ? 0
?
1 if DG0
Allow CP/CPTviolation
1 w/o CP/CPT violation
Absent w/o CP/CPT violation
If z ? 0 Prob(B0 ? B0,t) ? Prob(B0 ? B0,t)
New parameterization allows to test conventional
assumptions on CP/T/CPT violation in mixing
7
Variation B decay into CP eigenstates
Allow DG ? 0
?
Different expression for coefficients C and S
complex CP-parameter characterizes
interferencebetween mixing decay
8
Effect of DG?0, CP/T/CPT violation on B decay rate
Flavor eigenstate sample
Sensitive top/q Im(z)Dm DG (2nd order)
t-parityevenoddeven
unmixed
mixed
Effect of q/p opposite for B0/B0
Naïve model DG/G 20 q/p 0.9 Im(z)
0.1
CP eigenstate sample
t-parityevenoddodd
Sensitive toRe(z)lCP DG (1st order)
Naïve model Re(z) 0.2 DG/G 20 q/p
0.9
(Untagged eventsalso sensitive to DG/G)
Clearly a precision measurement, effects of
detector performance not even yet included
9
The measurement Data Samples
Nov 1999- June 2002 data ? 82 fb-1 on-peak 88
million BB pairs
Samples of B decays to flavor-specific final
states
(31000 events)
charge conjugate decays are implied, unless
specified
Samples of B decays to CP-eigenstates with
charmonium .
(2600 events)
CP -1
CP 1
10
The measurement Fit Procedure
  • Effects of (DG?0, CPT violation) small ? be
    precise
  • Take -level physics effects that can fake
    CP/CPT/DG into account
  • Accurate detector response modelling
  • Simultaneous fit for q/p, DG/G, Dm, Im(z),
    Re(z) and lCP to time-dependence of CP and
    flavor eigenstates, including tagged and untagged
    events

FitModel
? Detector response(Dt, ftag, frec)
  • Account for
  • Possible direct CP violation in the CP
    eigenstate sample (lCP)
  • Correlation between reco B and tag B via
    interference between CKM-allowed and
    doubly-CKM suppressed decays
  • Account for
  • Incorrect assignments of the flavour tagging
    algorithm (separate mistag fractions for B0
    and B0bar)
  • Dt resolution that is comparable to the B
    life time and asymmetric for positive and
    negative dt (triple Gaussian Dt resolution
    model)
  • Account for possible asymmetries in detector
    response for positive and negative particles

11
Results Limits on DG, search for CP,T,CPT
violation in mixing
Preliminary result
SM ?-0.003
Mixing
Best limit so far DG/Glt20, big improvement
Eur. Phys. J. C 28 (2003) 155-173
SM q/p-1 ? 5?10-4
CP T violation
S i m u l t a n e o u s f i t
SM 0
CPT CP violation
SM 0
90 CL intervals
Physics parameter correlations O(5), largest
correlation 17
(Assuming CPT invariance Consistent with above
results)
Mixing
CP T violation
12
Results Limits on DG, search for CP,T,CPT
violation in mixing
(CP/CPT violation)
(CP/T violation)
13
Summary
  • First simultaneous measurement of DG/G, CP, T
    and CPT violation in the B0 system
  • Hadronic data sample Nov 1999 June 2002 (82
    fb-1)
  • Much improved limit on DG/G
  • DG/G lt 20 (90 C.L., PDG 2003 (DELPHI)) ?
    DG/G lt 8 (90 C.L. this analysis)
  • Measurement of CP and T violation (q/p)
    consistent with Standard Model expectation
  • Also consistent with previous BaBar measurement
    using di-lepton events
  • Strongest test of CPT invariance outside K0
    system to date
  • BaBar (2003) Im(z) 0.038 ? 0.029 ? 0.025
    Re(z) 0.014 ? 0.035 ? 0.034
  • Belle di-Lepton (2002) Im(z) -0.03 ? 0.01 ?
    0.03 Re(z) 0.00 ? 0.12 ? 0.02
  • OPAL Z ? bb (1997) Im(z) 0.040 ? 0.032 ?
    0.012

14
(Backup slides)
15
Correlations between physics parameters
16
Summary of systematic uncertainties
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com