Title: Generic Settlement Examples
1Generic Settlement Examples
- September 30, 2003
- Pamela Kozlowski
- Barker, Dunn Rossi, Inc.
2Two Sets of Settlement Examples
- Three bus settlement examples
- Bilateral Contracts
- Six bus settlement examples
- Bilateral Contracts
- Congestion Revenue Rights (CRRs)
- Introduces Zones and Hubs
3Three Bus Settlement Examples
4Three bus power system description
- 3 Busses 1 through 3
- 2 Loads
- 3 Generators
- 3 Transmission Lines
- 75 MW thermal limit on line from Bus 1 to Bus 3
- Ignore losses (emphasizes congestion impacts on
LMPs)
5Three bus power system generation offers
- Generator 1 10/MWh
- Generator 2 12/MWh
- Generator 3 20/MWh
6Three Bus Settlement Examples
- Examples developed to illustrate
- who pays congestion costs and
- impact of bilateral contracts on such congestion
costs - Examples build upon one another
- Examples assume DA security constrained dispatch
with no deviations in real-time
7Three Bus Settlement Examples Description
- No congestion
- Case without bilateral contracts
- Case with bilateral contracts
- Case A
- Congestion with bilateral contracts delivered to
load - Case B
- Congestion with bilateral contracts FOB
8Three bus power system overview no congestion
9No Congestion Case ERCOT Settlement
10No Congestion Case with Bilateral Contracts
- G1 has a contract to provide 25 MW of delivered
power to L3 _at_ 15/MWh - G2 has a contract to to provide 25 MW of
delivered power to L3 _at_ 15/MWh - Bilateral schedules are submitted
- G1 to L3 of 25 MW
- G2 to L3 of 25 MW
11No Congestion Case with Bilateral Contracts
ERCOT Settlement
12Congestion Case A with Bilateral Contracts
(delivered to load)
- Increase load at Bus 3 from 50 MW to 100 MW
- Same bilateral contracts as in the case with no
congestion - G1 has a contract to provide 25 MW of delivered
power to L3 _at_ 15/MWh - G2 has a contract to to provide 25 MW of
delivered power to L3 _at_ 15/MWh - Bilateral schedules are submitted to ERCOT
- G1 to L3 of 25 MW
- G2 to L3 of 25 MW
13Congestion Case A Unconstrained Flows
14Congestion Case A Security Constrained Flows
15Congestion Case A Why is Bus 3 price 14/MWh
- The LMP at bus 3 equals the marginal cost to
supply 1 more MW of energy to that bus - Increase load at Bus 3 from 100 MW to 101 MW (see
next slide) - To supply 1 more MW of energy to Bus 3 increases
the total cost from 1,550 to 1,564 1,564 -
1,550 14 - To supply 1 more MW of energy to Bus 3 the
generator dispatch changes as follows - Generator 1 backs down by 1 MW (from 125 to 124
MWs) at 10/MWh and - Generator 2 increases by 2 MW (from 25 to 27 MWs)
at 12/MWh - (-1MW)(10/MWh) (2MW)(12/MWh) 14/MWh
- The marginal cost to supply 1 more MW of energy
to Bus 3 is 14/MWh
16One-line showing determination of Marginal Price
at Bus 3
17Congestion Case A with Bilateral Contracts
(delivered to load) ERCOT Settlement
18Case A DA Net Settlement by Entity including
Bilateral Contracts (Settle at Load, Bus 3)
19Congestion Case B with Bilateral Contracts (FOB)
- Same as Congestion Case A, except the bilateral
contracts are FOB - G1 has a contract to provide 25 MW of FOB power
to L3 _at_ 12.00/MWh - G2 has a contract to to provide 25 MW of FOB
power to L3 _at_ 12.00/MWh - Bilateral schedules are submitted to ERCOT
- G1 to L3 of 25 MW
- G2 to L3 of 25 MW
20Congestion Case B with Bilateral Contracts (FOB)
ERCOT Settlement
21Case B DA Net Settlement by Entity including
Bilateral Contracts (Settle FOB)
22Three Bus Examples - Summary
23Six Bus Settlement Examples
24Six bus power system - overview
Load Zone X
Hub
Load Zone Y
25Six bus power system description
- 6 Busses A through F
- 4 Loads LB, LD, LE and LF
- 2 Load Zones
- LB and LD are in Zone X
- LE and LF are in Zone Y
- Load zone price equals load weighted average of
prices at load nodes within the zone - 5 Generators G1 through G5
- 8 Transmission Lines
- 250 MW thermal limit on line A-B
- 1 Hub
- Defined by Busses C and E
- Hub price equals arithmetic average of prices at
nodes that make up the hub - Ignore losses (emphasizes congestion impacts on
LMPs)
26Some basic model characteristics
- Generators
- Each has five increasing incremental prices (see
following table) - The following diagrams only show the price of the
last block cleared/dispatched - Each Generator is capable of being dispatched in
economic order over its entire range - Loads
- Each Load is firm (non-price responsive)
- Total Load LB at Bus B will be increased later to
force congestion - Transmission
- Line from Bus A to Bus B near limit
27Generator data
Piecewise Linear Curve Model
286 Bus Settlement Examples
- Examples developed to illustrate
- who pays congestion costs and
- impact of bilateral contracts and CRRs on such
congestion costs - Examples build upon one another
- Examples assume DA security constrained dispatch
with no deviations in real-time
29Six Bus Settlement Examples - Description
30Example 1 Day-Ahead Solution Flows
31Example 1 LMPs for Load Zones and Hub
32Example 1 ERCOT DA settlement
33Example 1a Bilateral Contracts
- Load LB has the following bilateral contracts for
which only MW amounts are reported to ERCOT - to buy 220 MW of supply _at_ 15/MWh from G1 at
ZoneX - to buy 180 MW of supply _at_ 30/MWh from G5 at Bus F
34Example 1a DA Net Settlement by Entity,
including Bilateral Contracts
35Example 1a Observations
- DA LMPs at all locations the same, 23/MWh
- Effective DA price for
- Generator 1 7,440/400MWh 18.60/MWh
- Generator 5, paid 1,260 for no production
- Load B 8,700/400MWh 21.75/MWh
- No congestion
- No CRR settlement
36Example 2
- In Example 2, the Load at Bus B is increased from
400 MW to 600 MW
37Example 2 DA Solution Unconstrained Flows
38Example 2 DA Solution Security Constrained
Flows
39Example 2 LMPs for Load Zones and Hub
40Example 2 ERCOT DA settlement
41Example 2a Bilateral Contracts (Settle at Zone)
- Bilateral Contracts are the same as in Example 1
- Load LB has the following bilateral contracts for
which only MW amounts are reported to ERCOT - to buy 220 MW of supply _at_ 15/MWh from G1 at
ZoneX - to buy 180 MW of supply _at_ 30/MWh from G5 at Bus F
42Example 2a DA Net Settlement by Entity,
including Bilateral Contracts (Settle at Zone)
43Example 2b Bilateral Contracts (Settle at
Generator)
- Bilateral contracts are the same as in Example
2a, except Load LBs bilateral contract with G1
settles at Bus A instead of at ZoneX - Load LB has the following bilateral contracts for
which only MW amounts are reported to ERCOT - to buy 220 MW of supply _at_ 15/MWh from G1 at Bus
A - to buy 180 MW of supply _at_ 30/MWh from G5 at Bus F
44Example 2b DA Net Settlement by Entity,
including Bilateral Contracts (Settle at
Generator)
45Example 2c Bilateral Contracts (Settle at
Generator) and Load has CRRs
- Bilateral contracts are the same as in Example 2b
- Load LB has the following bilateral contracts for
which only MW amounts are reported to ERCOT - to buy 220 MW of supply _at_ 15/MWh from G1 at Bus
A - to buy 180 MW of supply _at_ 30/MWh from G5 at Bus
F - Load LB acquires 240 MW CRR from Bus A to Zone X
-
46Example 2c DA Net Settlement by Entity,
including Bilateral Contracts (Settle at
Generator) CRRs
47Example 2d Bilateral Contracts (Settle at Hub)
- Bilateral contracts are the same as in Example
2a, 2b 2c, except Load LBs bilateral contract
with G1 settles at the Hub - Load LB has the following bilateral contracts for
which only MW amounts are reported to ERCOT - to buy 220 MW of supply _at_ 15/MWh from G1 at Hub
- to buy 180 MW of supply _at_ 30/MWh from G5 at Bus
F -
48Example 2d DA Net Settlement by Entity,
including Bilateral Contracts (Settle at Hub)
49Example 2e Bilateral Contracts (Settle at Hub)
and Load and Generator have CRRs
- Bilateral contracts are the same as in Example 2d
- Load LB has the following bilateral contracts for
which only MW amounts are reported to ERCOT - to buy 220 MW of supply _at_ 15/MWh from G1 at Hub
- to buy 180 MW of supply _at_ 30/MWh from G5 at Bus
F - G1 acquires 220 MW CRR from Bus A to Hub
- Load LB acquires 240 MW CRR from Hub to Zone X
-
50Example 2e DA Net Settlement by Entity,
including Bilateral Contracts (Settle at Hub)
CRRs
51Six Bus Examples 1 and 2 Observations