AHLoS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

AHLoS

Description:

... (4 beacons to simultaneously estimate speed of sound) ... Squaring distance functions results in set of linear eqns. Speed of sound just another unknown ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: laboratory7
Category:
Tags: ahlos | of | sound | speed

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AHLoS


1
AHLoS
  • Review of Dynamic Fine-Grained Localization in
    Ad-Hoc Networks of Sensors (A. Savvides, C. Han,
    M. Srivastava)
  • Lewis Girod
  • 22 May 2001

2
Points to consider when evaluating localization
work
3
Ranging Assumptions
  • Important points to consider about ranging
  • Simulation or Experiment?
  • If simulation, where did the data come from?
  • Real data how was it collected? (see
    experiment below)
  • Modeled data What are the models?
  • If experiment, what was the experimental setup?
  • Indoors? Outdoors?
  • Multipath environment?
  • Obstructed environment?
  • Beacon placement?

4
Algorithmic Assumptions
  • Points to consider about algorithms
  • Power efficiency.. Many things consume power
  • Ranging experiments
  • Communication of intermediate results
  • Communications overhead due to noise, collision,
    etc
  • Centralized vs. distributed
  • Varies on a continuum
  • No one-size-fits-all solution.. Either can be
    appropriate
  • Iterative estimation often part of distributed
    solution
  • Intermediate results must be communicated.. Can
    be costly
  • Convergence time is critical to lowering power
    requirements
  • Convergence often affected by environmental
    conditions

5
AHLoS
6
RSSI Findings
  • RSSI is not useful for fine-grained localization
  • RSSI ? 1/rn, where n depends on
  • Environment grass vs concrete
  • Multipath constructive/destructive interference
  • Antenna height
  • Fading
  • OBS/LOS
  • Time-varying long term dependence on environment
  • Motion can help here, not always possible with
    sensor nets
  • Precision was a few meters at best

7
Ultrasound Findings
  • Medusa node 5 pairs of transceivers, pointed
    in different directions
  • Ultrasound time-of-flight system
  • Claim multipath variations can be filtered out
  • It is true that the variations caused by
    multipath can be filtered out easily by taking
    multiple measurements
  • Does not solve problems with persistent effects
  • constructive interference
  • lightweight obstructions to LOS (e.g. foliage)
  • Heavy obstructed conditions (NLOS)

8
Algorithmic Findings
  • Atomic Multilateration
  • Requires ranges to 3 beacons (4 beacons to
    simultaneously estimate speed of sound)
  • Maximum Likelikood estimate
  • Minimum Mean Square Estimate
  • Constraint equations from distance estimates
  • Squaring distance functions results in set of
    linear eqns
  • Speed of sound just another unknown
  • Important underlying assumption that errors in
    data fit a gaussian error model

9
Collaborative Multilateration
  • Collaborators must see 3 neighbors that are
    either beacons or are other collaborators
  • i.e. subgraph of nodes with degree ? 3
  • System of distance equations.. Nonlinear
  • Solve with gradient descent or simulated annealing

10
Iterative Multilateration
  • Combine Atomic and Collaborative multilateration
  • Small fraction of nodes (beacons) know their
    position
  • All-to-all ranges measured
  • Estimate positions of unknown node with
    multilateration preference for atomic because it
    is more accurate and computationally less
    expensive
  • Newly estimated nodes now considered beacons,
    iteratively estimate positions of other nodes
  • Node density requirements to achieve degree of 3
  • Requirements are on node degree (at least 3 or 4)
  • Analytical result for uniform distributions on
    plane, 10m range, 0.016 nodes/m2 provides 98
    probability of degree 3 connectivity

11
Experimental Results
  • Experiments with 9 Medusa nodes and a PC
  • No results showing error in localization
  • No description of environment (tabletop?)
  • Power model does not consider sound emitter
  • Only considers radio cost, processor cost
  • Analysis only considers radio cost
  • No results describing convergence properties
  • How many iterations does it take to get the
    answers?

12
Centralized vs Distributed
  • Argues for distributed solutions using simulation
  • Fully Centralized energy cost linear with
    network size
  • Fully Distributed cost independent of network
    size
  • This is not surprising
  • A more interesting question relates to
    convergence
  • Given convergence properties, what is the correct
    degree of centralization?
  • What is the optimal cluster size
  • Where a cluster-head does a local centralized
    computation
  • Balance cost of transmitting data estimates
    with cost of iteration

13
Unanswered Questions
  • Data on power consumption? How much do acoustics
    cost relative to GPS?
  • Accuracy of Position Estimates
  • Convergence properties
  • Sensitivity of above to degree and type of error?
  • More detail on experimental setup
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com