Framework for the Study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Framework for the Study

Description:

Frame the answer to the question so that another scholar might grasp easily ... Eliminate most articles and prepositions. Include focus or topic of the study ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: jackco4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Framework for the Study


1
Framework for the Study
2
A framework for the study
  • A focus for the study
  • A paradigm for the study
  • Methods associated with the paradigms
  • A format for composing sections
  • Summary

3
A focus for the study
  • Focus for a study is central concept being
    examined in a scholarly study.
  • May emerge
  • extensive literature review
  • be suggested by colleagues, researchers
  • developed through practical experiences

4
Focus the topic
  • describe it succinctly, draft a working title,
    and consider whether it is researchable
  • complete the following sentence My study is
    about . . .

5
Describe the topic succinctly
  • Frame the answer to the question so that another
    scholar might grasp easily meaning of project
  • Avoid complex and erudite language.
  • Good, sound research projects begin with
    straightforward, uncomplicated thoughts, easily
    read and understood.

6
Draft working title for the study
  • Will help focus direction of research
  • Will help position the central concept before the
    writer at the beginning.
  • Dont worry -- the working title will be modified
    -- many times as you proceed with the project

7
Draft working title for the study
  • Be brief and avoid wasting words, e.g, eliminate
    unnecessary words such as An Approach to . . .
    and A Study of . . ..
  • Use single title or a double title
  • Consider title no longer than 12 words
  • Eliminate most articles and prepositions
  • Include focus or topic of the study

8
Consider whether the topic is researchable
  • Is topic researchable, given time, resources and
    availability of data?
  • Is there personal interest in topic to sustain
    attention?
  • Will results be of interest to others (e.g., in
    the state, region, nation)?

9
Consider whether the topic is researchable
  • Is topic likely to be publishable in scholarly
    journal (or attractive to dissertation
    committee)?
  • Does study (a) fill a void, (b) replicate, (c)
    extend, or (d) develop new ideas in scholarly
    literature?
  • Will the project contribute to career goals?

10
Consider whether the topic is researchable
  • Needs to weight these factors before proceeding
    with study
  • Ask others for reactions to the topic

11
A paradigm for the study
  • Once we have specific focus we must select
    overall paradigm for the study
  • Two paradigms
  • qualitative
  • quantitative
  • Both have roots in 20th-century philosophical
    thinking

12
Quantitative Approach
  • Termed traditional,
  • Positivist,
  • Experimental, or
  • Empiricist paradigm.
  • Comte, Mill, Durkheim, Newton and Locke

13
Qualitative Approach
  • Constructivist approach or naturalistic
  • Interpretative approach
  • Postpositivist or postmodern perspective
  • Began as countermoverment to positivist tradition
    in late 19th century
  • Dilthey, Weber and Kant.

14
Assumptions of the paradigms
  • Ontological
  • What is the nature of reality?
  • Epistemological
  • What is the relationship of the researcher to
    that being researched?
  • Axiological
  • What is the role of values?

15
Assumptions of the paradigms
  • Rhetorical
  • What is the language of research?
  • Methodological
  • What is the process of research?
  • Important to understand these assumptions because
    they will provide direction for designing all
    phases of a research study

16
What is the nature of reality?
  • (Quantitative) Reality is objective and singular
    and apart from the researcher.
  • (Qualitative) Reality is subjective and multiple
    as seen by participants in a study.

17
What is relationship of researcher to that being
researched?
  • (Quantitative) Researcher is independent from
    that being researched.
  • (Qualitative) Researcher interacts with that
    being researched.

18
What is the role of values?
  • (Quantitative) Value-free and unbiased
  • (Qualitative) Value-laden and biased

19
What is language of the research
  • (Quantitative) Formal, based on set definitions,
    impersonal voice, use of accepted quantitative
    words
  • (Qualitative) Informal, evolving decisions,
    personal voice, use of accepted qualitative words

20
What is the process of research?
  • (Quantitative) deductive process
  • cause and effect
  • static design -- categories isolated before study
  • context-free
  • generalization leading to prediction, explanation
    and understanding
  • accurate and reliable through validity and
    reliability

21
What is the process of research?
  • (Qualitative) inductive process
  • mutual simultaneous shaping of factors
  • emerging design -- categories identified during
    research process
  • context-bound
  • patterns, theories developed for understanding
  • accurate and reliable through verification

22
Single paradigm for the study
  • Identify a single research paradigm for the
    overall design of the study.

23
Why not use both paradigms?
  • To use both adequately and accurately extends
    dissertation studies beyond normal limits of size
    and scope.
  • Studies that employ combined paradigms tend to be
    funded projects with multiple investigators
    collecting data over an extended period of time.

24
Why not use both paradigms?
  • Expensive, time-consuming, and lengthy
  • Researchers and faculty seldom are trained in
    skills necessary to conduct studies from more
    than one paradigm.
  • Individuals learn one paradigm and this
    perspective becomes the dominant view in their
    research.

25
Criteria for selection
  • Worldview of the researcher
  • Training and experiences
  • Psychological attributes of the researcher
  • Nature of the problem
  • Audience for the research

26
Worldview of the researcher
  • (Quantitative) more comfortable with an objective
    stance using survey or experimental instruments
  • (Quantitative) see reality as subjective and
    want a close interaction with informants

27
Training and experience
  • (Quantitative) technical writing skills
    computer statistical skills library skills
  • (Qualitative) literary writing skills computer
    text analysis skills library skills

28
Psychological attributes
  • (Quantitative) comfort with rules and guidelines
    for conducting research low tolerance for
    ambiguity time for study of short duration
  • (Qualitative) comfort with lack of specific
    rules and procedures for conducting research
    high tolerance for ambiguity time for lengthy
    study

29
Nature of the problem
  • (Quantitative) previously studied by other
    researchers so that body of literature exists
    known variables existing theories
  • (Qualitative) exploratory research variables
    unknown context important may lack theory base
    for study

30
Audience for the study
  • (Quantitative) individuals accustomed to
    /supportive of quantitative studies
  • (Qualitative) individuals accustomed to
    /supportive of qualitative studies

31
Methods associated with paradigms
  • It is useful to consider the method of data
    collection and analysis to be associated with the
    paradigm of choice.
  • Identify a tentative guiding method for use
    within the qualitative or quantitative paradigm.

32
Quantitative methods
  • Experiments include
  • true experiments with random assignment of
    subjects to treatment conditions and
  • quasi experiments that use nonrandomized designs
  • quasi experiments include single-subject designs

33
Quantitative methods
  • Surveys include
  • cross-sectional and longitudinal studies
  • using questionnaires or structured interviews for
    data collection
  • with intent of generalizing from a sample to a
    population

34
Qualitative methods (approaches)
  • Ethnographies
  • researcher studies an intact cultural group in a
    natural setting during a prolonged period of time
    by collecting primarily observational data
  • process is flexible and typically evolves
    contextually in response to the lived realities
    encountered in field setting

35
Qualitative methods (approaches)
  • Critical ethnography
  • researcher chooses between conceptual
    alternatives and value-laden judgments to
    challenge research, policy, and other forms of
    human activity
  • attempt to aid emancipatory goals, negate
    repressive influences, raise consciousness, and
    invoke call to action leading to social change

36
Qualitative methods (approaches)
  • Grounded theory
  • attempts to derive a theory by using multiple
    stages of data collection and the refinement and
    interrelationship of categories of information
  • primary characteristics include
  • constant comparison of data with emerging
    categories
  • theoretical sampling of different groups to
    maximize similarities and differences of
    information

37
Qualitative methods (approaches)
  • Case studies
  • explores a single entity or phenomenon
  • bounded by time and activity (a program, event,
    process, institution or social group)
  • collects detailed information
  • using variety of data collection procedures
  • during sustained period of time

38
Qualitative methods (approaches)
  • Phenomenological studies
  • human experiences are examined through detailed
    descriptions of people being studied
  • understanding the lived experiences
  • involves studying a small number of subjects
    through extensive and prolonged engagement to
    develop patterns and relationships of meaning
  • brackets own experiences to understand

39
Format for composing sections
  • Select a format for the overall design of the
    study
  • Format would depend greatly upon the paradigm
    chosen
  • Methodology is the format for the entire study

40
Quantitative format
  • Standards easily identified in journal articles
    and research studies
  • Sections
  • Introduction
  • Review of the Literature
  • Methods
  • Appendices Instruments

41
Quantitative format
  • Introduction (expands to)
  • Context (Statement of the Problem)
  • Purpose of the Study
  • Research Questions Objectives Hypotheses
  • Theoretical Perspective
  • Definition of Terms
  • Delimitations and Limitations of the Study
  • Significance of the Study

42
Quantitative format
  • Methods (expands to)
  • Research Design
  • Sample, Population, or Subjects
  • Instrumentation and Materials
  • Variables in the Study
  • Data Analysis

43
Quantitative format
  • Less standardized but should be consistent with
    the qualitative paradigm assumptions
  • The design should convey strong rationale for
    choice of a qualitative design
  • Two possible models for format

44
Qualitative format 1
  • Introduction
  • Procedure
  • Appendices

45
Qualitative format 1
  • Introduction (expands to)
  • Statement of the Problem
  • Purpose of the Study
  • The Grand Tour Question and Subquestions
  • Definitions
  • Delimitations and Limitations
  • Significance of the Study

46
Qualitative format 1
  • Procedure (expands to)
  • Assumptions and Rationale for the Design
  • The Type of Design Used
  • The Role of the Researcher
  • Data Collection Procedures
  • Data Analysis Procedures
  • Methods of Verification
  • Outcome, its Relation to Theory and Literature

47
Qualitative format 2
  • Introduction General Questions or Topic
  • Significance of the Research
  • Site and Sample Selections
  • Role of Researcher in Management, Including
    Entry, Reciprocity and Ethics
  • Research Strategies

48
Qualitative format 2
  • Data Collection Techniques
  • Managing and Recording Data
  • Data Analysis Strategies
  • Management Plan, Timeline, Feasibility
  • Appendices
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com