LEADERSHIP for ENERGY AUTOMATED PROCESSING LEAP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

LEADERSHIP for ENERGY AUTOMATED PROCESSING LEAP

Description:

Kevin Jandora, Morgan Stanley. Margaret Allen, Statoil ... Global View ConfirmHub - Mike McSpedon et al. at Global View reported on their ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: committ
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LEADERSHIP for ENERGY AUTOMATED PROCESSING LEAP


1
LEADERSHIP for ENERGY AUTOMATED PROCESSING
LEAP
  • Presenter Michele A. Reynolds, Shell Trading US

2
Who are WE?
  • Our Mission
  • To promote efficient and reliable transaction
    processing within the energy trading industry by
    means of automation and standardization. In
    connection therewith
  • To pursue the automation of data processed
    between trading counterparties and companies that
    provide ancillary inspection, storage, pipeline
    movement, and related services.
  • To promote simplifying business standards and
    practices.
  • To develop and promote the use of non-proprietary
    electronic data standards, conventions and
    dictionaries, favoring industry standards over
    proprietary ones.
  • To retain control wherever possible over such
    intellectual property, while making freely
    available to industry participants by means of
    licensing for use in accordance with the
    principles of this charter.
  • To encourage cooperation among the energy trading
    parties and other industry participants/associatio
    ns towards achieving our mission. To encourage
    broad based participation in the association.
  • To promote a robust competitive environment for
    our industrys product and service providers.
  • To provide equal access to the standards for all
    members.

3
Where we are today
  • Trading companies utilize Trading Application Soft
    ware from vendors like Trade Capture, Triple
    Point Technologies, Sungard, Solarc, Open Link,
    Allergo, etc. or in-house developed solutions.
  • These Trading Systems typically provide for
  • Entry of Exchange and OTC Financial Physical
    trades
  • Contract Generation
  • Risk Management Market Credit
  • Scheduling Waterborne, Pipeline, Land based
  • Commercial Invoicing Prepayments, Provisional
    Billings, Finalizations Debit/Credit Notes
  • Some degree of STP automation within the walls of
    the trading company
  • These systems require
  • The manual comparison of issued inbound
    counter-party contracts (excluding eConfirm and
    EFET) and invoices.
  • The entry of quantities specifications of
    commodities received, stored delivered.
  • The manual calculation of fees such as pipeline
    tariffs, ocean freight, etc. to insure accuracy.
  • The maintenance of a myriad of data covering
    counter-parties, commodities, holiday calendars,
    fee structures, etc.

4
Where we want to be
  • Automated matching of repetitive and one off
    energy contracts including brokers.
  • Automated collection of inspection, tank reports
    and pipeline tickets. Notification of receipts
    and entry of this data into the Trading System
    utilizing  XML documents.
  • Automated matching of Commercial Invoices between
    parties (Including Physical Deals).
  • Standardization of Broker Posted Price formats
  • Computation of pipeline tariffs, ocean freight,
    etc. via services.
  • Automation and standardization of data to
    facilitate Exchange and Truck and Bulk
    reconciliations
  • In short, we want to extend the benefits of STP
    beyond the walls of our individual trading
    organizations

5
How we get there
  • Form an association with a steering committee.
  • Development of collection distribution services
    which provide for
  • The receipt of electronically transmitted
    Inspection and Tank Reports as XML Documents or
    direct entry via a hosted WEB site.
  • The notification of received reports, e.g. email,
    IM.
  • The publication of Inspection Tank Reports via
    XML Documents for direct entry into Trading
    Systems Logistic Systems utilized by Producers.
  • Development of a pipeline tickets collection and
    common XML document distribution , ocean freight
    e.g, Dataloy, etc. computation services.
  • Develop an inclusive commercial document matching
    service which provides for
  • Matching commercial invoices starting with
    financial Invoices then physical invoices.
  • Matching repetitive and one off OTC Contracts.
  • Develop pipeline tariff, ocean freight e.g,
    Dataloy, etc. computation services.
  • Develop alliances with established full service
    IT Energy Service Providers with similar
    functional technical expertise who directly
    benefit from the initiative and who will fund the
    above developments with a return on investment
    once established and profitable, utilize the
    services effect adoption of the services by
    their position in the industry.
  • Once the above are established, utilize the
    relationships established and data collected in
    providing the matching services to develop Energy
    Data Services.

6
Result WIN WIN - WIN
  • User Companies
  • Benefits of automation Greater capacity, reduced
    errors, earlier identification of claims, data
    mining of XML documents, dedication of staff to
    transaction processing. Resulting in a positive
    effect on the bottom line.
  • Inspection Companies and Storage Providers
  • Earlier payment for services, favored provider
    status, access to automation services
    billing, accounting, etc. resulting in a improved
    business posture.
  • Service Providers
  • New source of revenue, extension of the existing
    business model infrastructure expertise with a
    substantial upside and potential for other
    opportunities.

7
LEAP Membership
  • Target Members
  • Leaders in Operations and IT from organizations
    engaged in the petroleum supply and trading
    business (may be broadened in the future to other
    energy trading).
  • Membership Procedures
  • Membership is open on a nondiscriminatory basis
    to energy trading entities (defined as crude oil,
    petroleum products, ethanol and possible power
    and natural gas).
  • There would be two classes of membership
  • Member all physical traders must be members
    pay full dues
  • Associate Member any paper traders prohibited
    from physical trading under Fed. Reserve Reg. Y
    not exempt, may join as an associate member
    with reduced dues. Any associate member upon
    becoming a director must pay full dues.
  • All members would have to be legal entities, not
    individuals.
  • Members could be removed for misconduct, such as
    infringing the antitrust rules of the
    corporation.

8
Current Participating Companies
  • Arcadia
  • BP
  • BPN Paribas
  • Chevron
  • Conoco Phillips
  • Glencore
  • Hess
  • J Aron
  • Morgan Stanley
  • Sempra
  • Shell Trading
  • Statoil

9
Board of Directors2006-2007
  • The board shall consist of up to nine
    representatives, with no more than one from any
    company. Directors would serve annual terms,
    with re-election permitted. The board shall
    elect a Chairman, Secretary and Treasurer from
    amongst the elected directors.
  • The founding board members are
  • Vlad Zeman, BP (Chairman)
  • Vincent Loud, Sempra Energy Trading (Secretary)
  • David Porter, Glencore (Treasurer)
  • Michele Reynolds, Shell Trading US (Promotion)
  • Thomas Krivas, Hess (Promotion)
  • Kathi Benini, Goldman Sachs
  • Kevin Jandora, Morgan Stanley
  • Margaret Allen, Statoil

subject to pending internal member company
approvals.
10
LEAP Committees
  • Contract/Physical Matching Workstream Group
  • The Colonial Pipeline project, which is the
    automated contract confirmation matching, is
    currently underway between Glencore and Morgan
    Stanley with use of ICE e-Confirm. XML schema and
    a Master Trading Agreement have been developed
    and circulated to LEAP members. The two parties
    electronic interfaces to eConfirm are currently
    in Beta release, with more members planning to
    interface in the coming months.

11
LEAP Committees
  • Commercial Documents/Certificate of QQ
    Workstream Group
  • This work group is focused on the automation of
    inspection data and the need for developing
    standard XML format with CVX for nomination
    appointments (energy company to inspect company)
    and inspection results (inspect company to energy
    company). Invoice matching is outside the current
    objective at this time.

12
LEAP Committees
  • Physical Exchange/Imbalance Reconciliation
    Workstream Group
  • This work group is focused on issues relating to
    large party exchanges and document flow
    inefficiencies and balancing problems. The
    go-forward plan is on seeking agreement on
    standards (with reference to PIDX) and specific
    work flow phases to include
  • Phase I File format for base products
  • Phase II HUB Construct.

13
Previous Speakers at Meetings
  • IECA - Liza Abad with IECA provided an overview
    of IECA as a resource IECA is an industrial
    credit association that provides credit reporting
    service for refiners and educational offerings to
    IECA members.
  • PIDX - Gary D. Bevers of PIDX provided an
    overview of PIDX and explored ways that the two
    organizations might work together the Petroleum
    Industry Data Exchange, PIDX, is the American
    Petroleum Institutes (API) committee on Global
    Electronic Business Standards in the oil and gas
    industry.
  • Tiegland-Hurt Assoc. LLP Lauren Teigland-Hunt
    discussed contract standardization issues and
    challenges in industry and conveyed her firms
    expertise in contract standardization.
  • ICE e-Confirm Bruce Tupper with ICE eConfirm
    made a presentation on ICE e-Confirms existing
    capacity to provide electronic transaction
    processing services and ICE e-Confirms existing
    XML schema. Tupper emphasized need for Master
    Agreement to be in place to adopt electronic
    confirmations. Tupper reported on ICE e-
    Confirms current interface trading system,
    noting 95 match rate with 5 for reconciliation.

14
Previous Speakers at Meetings
  • Transport4 - Bill Sande with Transport4 made a
    presentation on Transport4s capacity to provide
    automation services to manage transaction
    document flow.
  • Navarik - Bill Dobie with NAVARIK made a
    presentation on NAVARIKs capacity to provide
    automated CQQ document management support and
    provided a demonstration on NAVARIKs existing
    web-based automated services.
  • Sunguard - Doug Wendler and Austin Morris with
    SUNGARD reported on their capacity to provide
    automated counterparty matching services.
  • Global View ConfirmHub - Mike McSpedon et al. at
    Global View reported on their ConfirmHUB platform
    and their capacity to provide automated
    counterparty and broker matching services and
    also provided a demonstration on their Confirm
    HUB platform.

15
Additional Info
  • LEAPs Website COMING SOON
  • We invite you to join us at our next meeting
  • Tuesday, October 24th and Wednesday, October 25th
  • Hilton Hotel, Canary Wharf, London
  • For information Contact Maureen Beck at
    mabeck_at_sempratrading.com or 1 203-355-5321
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com