Vessel Collisions Case Studies of an LNG Ship and an Offshore Supply Vessel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Vessel Collisions Case Studies of an LNG Ship and an Offshore Supply Vessel

Description:

... Typical LNG ships (or FSRU or GBS) considering light and strong designs ... Click on the Energo logo to start animation. Case 1 Lightly Designed LNG Ship ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:234
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: frankp
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vessel Collisions Case Studies of an LNG Ship and an Offshore Supply Vessel


1
Vessel CollisionsCase Studies of an LNG Ship
and an Offshore Supply Vessel
  • Energo Engineering, Inc.
  • 3100 Wilcrest Drive, Suite 240
  • Houston, Texas 77042
  • (713) 532-2900
  • www.energoeng.com

June 2004
2
Summary
  • This presentation shows examples of an advanced
    structural analysis used to determine the
    potential damage caused by ship-to-ship
    collisions.
  • The presentation demonstrates that vessel
    collision studies need to account for the
    specific geometry and strength of the colliding
    vessels. The typically used empirical
    relationships can be misleading and wrong.
  • In this example case an LNG ship is struck by an
    Offshore Supply Vessel (OSV). The LNG ship could
    also be an offshore LNG terminal Floating or
    Gravity Base.

3
Objectives
  • This type of analysis are useful in defining data
    needed for risk studies as well as LNG ship or
    LNG terminal design.
  • This includes
  • Critical speed of impact that breaches the ship
    outer hull and containment (e.g., LNG, oil,
    chemical)
  • Size of containment breach hole needed for
    consequence analyses
  • Specific vessels that are of concern some
    vessels do not penetrate the containment
  • Areas of the ship that can be improved in design
    to prevent excessive collision damage

4
Characteristics of Collisions
  • Collisions are a complex nonlinear, dynamic
    impact problem
  • The examples shown are state-of-the-art and
    account for
  • Hull damage to the LNG ship
  • Bow crushing of the striking vessel
  • Energy dissipation via global motions of the LNG
    and striking vessel
  • The structural models account for this by
    considering
  • Multiple contact surfaces
  • Contact friction
  • Material and geometric nonlinearity
  • Material failure
  • Strain rate dependency

5
Ship Specific Controlling Factors
  • The following factors are accounted for in the
    examples shown
  • Traveling speed
  • Vessel draft and weight (LNG and striking vessel)
  • Striking angle
  • Initial impact location
  • These can be varied from case to case to
    represent typical field conditions

6
Example Cases - Background
  • Three example collision cases are shown
  • Specifics are as follows
  • Struck Vessel Typical LNG ships (or FSRU or
    GBS) considering light and strong designs
  • Striking Vessel 6600 BHP OSV, LOA 85 m, Beam 19
    m
  • Striking angles 45 degrees and 90 degrees
  • High striking speed (gt 10 knots)

7
Example Cases
  • Case 1 45 degrees Lightly Designed LNG ship
  • The LNG outer hull and containment is breached
  • Case 2 45 degrees Stronger Designed LNG Ship
  • The LNG outer hull is breached but not the LNG
    containment
  • Case 3 90 degrees Strongest Designed LNG Ship
  • The OSV bow crushes and there is localized breach
    of the LNG side shell but not the LNG containment
  • This is the preferred design configuration

8
Case 1 Lightly Designed LNG ShipGeneral View
Animation
Click on the Energo logo to start animation
9
Case 1 Lightly Designed LNG ShipSection View
Animation
Click on the Energo logo to start animation
10
Case 1 Lightly Designed LNG ShipView of the
Containment Hole
View is looking from outboard the LNG
ship. Black portion of the damaged area is the
resulting hole in the LNG containment.
11
Case 2 Stronger LNG ShipSection View Animation
Click on the Energo logo to start animation
12
Case 3 Strongest LNG Ship Section View Animation
Click on the Energo logo to start animation
13
Conclusions
  • Ship-to-ship collisions are very dependant upon
    many factors including the specific ship
    geometries
  • Empirical approaches can result in inaccurate
    findings
  • Detailed engineering analysis, as shown here, is
    the most accurate approach
  • This approach can be used to provide input to
  • Ship or LNG terminal design in terms of optimum
    bulkheads and scantlings to limit collision
    damage
  • Risk studies in terms of types of ships of
    concern and critical impact speeds
  • Consequence studies in terms of containment hole
    sizes (if any) and associated shape
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com