CMTS Brief

1
3rd Annual US Missile Defense Conference
Technology Security Policy and Missile
Defense Lisa Bronson Deputy Under Secretary of
Defense Technology Security Policy
Counter-Proliferation Director, Defense
Technology Security Administration 13 April
2005
2
Outline

• DTSAs Support to Missile Defense
• Missile Defense Licensing
• Industrys Role

3
Objective

• To be proactive and structured to support the
  missile defense goals of the President and
  Secretary of Defense by providing timely,
  consistent, and thorough review of missile
  defense licensing cases

4
DTSA Initiatives Support Missile Defense

• DTSA Missile Defense Triad
• Partnership with MDA
• USXPORTS Electronic Licensing
• New Acquisition Approach Technology Release
  Roadmap
• DTSA Outreach to Industry
• Lessons Learned from JSF

5
Factors Affecting Missile Defense Export
Licensing

• Low-Observable / Counter-Low-Observable (LO/CLO)
  EXCOM
• Interagency Missile Technology Export Control
  (MTEC) Review
• National Disclosure Policy Committee (NDPC)
• Review of License Applications
• Arms Export Control Act (AECA)
• International Traffic In Arms Regulations (ITAR)
• Foreign Country Obligations

6
Total DoD Munitions Cases Reviewed 2003/2004

7
Missile Defense Case Profile 2003/2004
8
DoD Missile Defense Cases Average DTSA Processing
Times
50
47
40
35
32
30
30
DAYS
21
20
16
14
11
10
0
DSP-73
DSP-85
Agreements
DSP-5
Triad Approach Reduces Processing Times without
Sacrificing Thorough Review
9
Industrys Role

• Plan Early - Technology Release Roadmap
• Design-to-Share (International)
• Coordinate Closely with DTSA Engineers
• Prepare License Applications with Care
• USXPORTS and D-TRADE Electronic
• Licenses

10
Foreign Participation

• Foreign Participation Encouraged
• Sharing Sensitive Technology
• Technology Security Protects All Participants
• Foreign Participants Must Accept Rigorous Third
  Party Transfer Rules

11
In Conclusion

• DTSA objective is to allocate our resources and
  order our priorities to ensure the MD Program
  schedule is not affected by the DoD license
  review process
• Program Managers and Industry must take
  responsibility for other review processes
  (LO/CLO, ENDP) and the quality and timeliness of
  license applications

An Effective, Mutually Beneficial Partnership Has
Begun