Evaluating the use of wikis in student group work within Blackboard VLE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluating the use of wikis in student group work within Blackboard VLE

Description:

To provide a technologically innovative approach to group ... 'The convenience of being able to work from home and not having to physically meet up as a group' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Samantha114
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluating the use of wikis in student group work within Blackboard VLE


1
Evaluating the use of wikis in student group work
within Blackboard VLE
  • Dr Nadia Amin, Clive Vassell and Stanka Winch
  • Harrow Business School
  • HEA ICS Conference 2008, Liverpool

2
Project Aims
  • To provide a technologically innovative approach
    to group coursework delivery and assessment
  • To increase integration and usage of the
    universitys existing Blackboard VLE to deliver
    and assess module content
  • To evaluate the effectiveness and use of wikis as
    a group work tool in comparison to traditional
    teaching and assessment methods

3
Wikis
  • Growing popularity of web 2.0 and social
    networking sites, blogs, wikis and tagging
  • Wiki is a new generation of collaborative tool
    enabling people to work simultaneously on the
    same documents in a timely manner.
  • Turban defines wiki as a website that enables
    visitors to add, remove, edit and change content
    without the need for registration.

4
Wikis within Blackboard VLE
5
Project Description
  • The wiki used was Teams LX add-on learning
    object integrated within Blackboard
  • Three modules with 30 students in total were
    selected
  • Undergraduate
  • 2EBU501 EBusiness Fundamentals
  • 2BUS501 Managing Business Resources
  • Postgraduate
  • 2BCO7H4 Managing Ecommerce
  • A wiki was created for each group of students,
    with editing rights set up for each group, where
    members were allowed to change the wiki content.
  • All students had read-only access to other
    groups wikis.
  • Lecturers monitored the wikis usage over one
    semester

6
Methodology
  • Quantitative and qualitative analysis was
    applied to verify project results
  • Students Survey all students were asked to
    complete questionnaire at the end of the project
  • Monitoring of wiki usage statistics, which showed
    individual student participation
  • Focus group meeting between students and tutors
  • Reflective statements were sought from one
    student group

7
Survey Questions
  • Have you used wikis before?
  • To what extent do you agree that the wiki was
    useful?
  • To what extent do you agree that the wiki was
    easy to use?
  • To what extent to you agree that access to the
    wiki was convenient and reliable?
  • To what extent do you agree that the supporting
    material on the use of the wiki was useful?
  • To what extent do you agree that he use of the
    wiki assisted with the assignment?
  • To what extent do you agree that the use of the
    wiki facilitated group collaboration?
  • To what extent do you agree that the use of the
    wiki was a useful learning experience?
  • To what extent do you agree that the wiki was a
    useful communication tool?
  • Would you like to see the use of wikis extended
    to other modules?

8
(No Transcript)
9
Survey Results Summary
  • Over 70 of students reported that they had never
    participated in wiki activity prior to this pilot
    project.
  • Student sentiment about the use of the wiki was
    clearly positive
  • When asked if wikis were useful and easy to use,
    over 75 replied Agree/Strongly Agree and
  • Over 60 of students agreed that the use of the
    wiki helped in their coursework assignment
  • Students felt that the wiki facilitates group
    collaboration, a view held by over 65 of the
    students.
  • Students spoke almost unanimously of the
    convenience factor that the wiki generated by
    enabling students to work in an asynchronous way
    from different locations, e.g. homes, university,
    etc.
  • Most students seemed to feel that there was room
    for improvement, for e.g. inconsistencies in
    text/picture formatting, the lack of a spell
    checker, etc.
  • 75 of students reported that they would like to
    see more use made of wikis on other modules

10
Wiki Usage tool
Participation for Group A User Total Page Saves Total Lines Modified 30 (112/377) 41 (809/1991) 22 (82/377) 28 (563/1991) 31 (116/377) 24 (487/1991) 18 (67/377) 7 (132/1991) Participation for Group B User Total Page Saves Total Lines Modified 1 83 (360/433) 89 (1532/1714) 2 8 (36/433) 7 (116/1714) 3 4 (17/433) 2 (35/1714) 4 5 (20/433) 2 (31/1714)
11
Students Reflective Statements
  • The convenience of being able to work from home
    and not having to physically meet up as a group.
  • ..Being able to communicate with your group
    members, and leaving comments whilst doing your
    work. So every time someone else logged on they
    could see the comments and take the work from
    there. Another one was it was easy to access
    and easy to update anytime you wanted. It was
    easy to use and you didnt need to have many
    skills to use the wiki.
  • My personal experience of using the wiki was
    excellent.
  • The use of wikis will help groups to see who is
    performing well and which individual is not
    participating and maybe looking for a free ride
    in the assignment.
  • ...I was surprised to learn how this could be
    both an exciting and beneficial method of doing
    coursework and group work in particular.
  • I think that the use of wikis within groups
    benefits both the group members and the tutors
    alike.

12
Focus Group Comments
  • Students found the use of the wiki valuable and
    interesting and were pleasantly surprised by the
    benefits it offered
  • It was really convenient for group members to
    communicate with each and leave messages through
    the comments facility provided by the wiki.
  • Students felt that while the wiki reduces the
    need (and frequency of) group meetings, it does
    not eliminate the need for face-to-face meetings.
    Group meetings and personal contacts are still
    needed especially at the onset of the coursework
    assignment.
  • Students also commented that wiki participation
    statistics do not necessarily reflect the actual
    contribution that an individual makes to the
    group work. Nevertheless, it was felt that it can
    be used to identify free-riders.
  • From a technical point of view wikis were seen as
    being easy to use, although some formatting
    problems were reported.

13
Conclusions
  • The project has helped to achieve the following
    key outcomes
  • Improved collaborative interaction between
    students in a group setting
  • Increased module content awareness, participation
    and performance by the students
  • Improved ability of staff to assess individual
    student contribution to group work
  • Improved student team working skills that are
    essential in the workplace
  • Improved assessment evaluation and feedback from
    course staff.
  • The university needs to ensure that the wiki
    software works reliably and that the software is
    kept up-to-date.

14
Acknowledgement
  • We wish to thank the Higher Education Academy,
    Information and Computer Science subject network
    for supporting this project under the General
    Development Fund 2007/8
  • and
  • all students at Harrow Business School who
    participated in this project
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com