WTO, FTAs: Instruments of imperialist domination - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

WTO, FTAs: Instruments of imperialist domination

Description:

... deal worse than negotiated by Malaysia and Indonesia. 40 sectors. 835 ... Millions of jobs that will never be created because of stifled domestic development ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: defau862
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WTO, FTAs: Instruments of imperialist domination


1
WTO, FTAs Instruments of imperialist domination
  • Launching Forum of
  • NO DEAL! MOVEMENT AGAINST UNEQUAL AGREEMENTS
  • Quezon City
  • November 9, 2007

2
Philippine poverty and backwardness
  • Widespread poverty
  • Worsening inequality
  • Agricultural and industrial backwardness
  • Overly reliant on cheap labor export, foreign
    capital- and debt

3
Filipinos aspire and struggle for development
  • For
  • true agrarian reform
  • genuine national industrialization
  • Against
  • imperialist domination of the economy
  • exploiting cheap labor, plundering natural
    resources and dominating our markets
  • exploitative international economic deals
  • multilateral WTO agreements
  • bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs), regional
    trade agreements (RTAs), economic partnership
    agreements (EPAs)
  • Go far beyond just trade ? also investment,
    services, competition policy, intellectual
    property rights, labor, govt procurement, dispute
    settlement

4
(1) FTAs deny us essential policies for
development
  • To build domestic economy we need
  • Trade protection against imports ? to give local
    producers the opportunity to develop
  • Tariff/non-tariff barriers
  • Foreign investment controls ? to ensure benefits
    from FDI
  • Equity requirements, domestic content, local
    hiring, technology transfer

5
(1) FTAs deny us essential policies for
development
  • Policies affirmed by historical experience
  • Used by all First World countries when they were
    developing
  • Britain, France, Germany, US, Japan (19th
    century-1950s)
  • Used by handful of Third World countries which
    made any sort of economic progress
  • South Korea, Taiwan, Malaysia (1960s-1980/90s)
  • Used by Socialist countries
  • Russia (1917), China (1949)

6
(2) FTAs impose policies that have already
severely damaged the economy
  • Philippines has been actively liberalizing trade
    and investment since the 1980s/90s
  • IMF-WB impositions, WTO agreements
  • Arguably the most liberalized country in
    Southeast Asia and also one of its poorest
    performing

7
(2) FTAs impose policies that have already
severely damaged the economy
  • Trade doubled as percentage of GDP
  • 52 (1980) ? 105 (2005)
  • Foreign investment quadrupled as percentage of
    GDP
  • 4 (1980) ? 14 (2005)
  • YET
  • Record sustained joblessness
  • Unemplt 8 (1980) ? 11 (2001-05)
  • 12 million Filipinos looking for work/additional
    work (2006) ? OFW export
  • De-industrialization and shrinking manufacturing
  • Share in GDP 26 (1980)?23(2005)
  • Share in employment (11? 9)
  • Falling food production per capita, rising
    agricultural trade deficits

8
JPEPA is unequal, defeatist and destructive
  • Grossly unequal
  • Backward Philippines gives up much more than
    advanced Japan
  • Philippines deal worse than negotiated by
    Malaysia and Indonesia

9
JPEPA is unequal, defeatist and destructive
  • Defeatist
  • Surrenders Philippine policy sovereignty and use
    of necessary economic policy tools
  • National Treatment, Most-Favored-Nation (MFN)
    Treatment, prohibition of performance
    requirements on investments
  • Unprecedented protection for Japanese investors.
    Investment FDI, portfolio investment
    intellectual property, contractual rights, tax
    breaks (taxation as expropriation)
  • Note JPEPA includes Singapore Issues already
    rejected at WTO for being anti-developmental

10
JPEPA is unequal, defeatist and destructive
  • Destructive
  • JPEPA drastically restricts the Philippines
    policy options precedent-setting vis-à-vis Japan
    and sets a dangerous benchmark for other FTAs
  • Note Handful of FTAs makes WTO virtually
    redundant, where Japan EU US Greater China
    ASEAN 90 of countrys intl trade and
    investment
  • Job losses in auto/auto parts assembly and
    iron/steel sectors, fisheries toxic waste
    imports commodification of nurses/careworkers
  • Millions of jobs that will never be created
    because of stifled domestic development

11
  • NO Deal! stands for democratic governance,
    economic sovereignty and building the national
    economy
  • NO Deal! supports economic relations based on
    equality and mutual benefit
  • NO Deal! rejects all unequal trade agreements
    which further undermine our already devastated
    economy
  • JPEPA, EU-ASEAN, RP-US, RP-China

12
Maraming salamat!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com