ISM at the Savannah River Site - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

ISM at the Savannah River Site

Description:

Steve Johnson, Manager. Operations Evaluation Department. Washington Savannah River Company ... and implement hazard controls. Analyze the hazards. Define ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: SRS48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ISM at the Savannah River Site


1
ISM at the Savannah River Site
  • Department of Energy Best Practices Workshop
  • Facility Evaluation Board
  • Steve Johnson, Manager
  • Operations Evaluation Department
  • Washington Savannah River Company
  • September 12-13, 2006

2
WSRC Facility Evaluation Board (FEB)
  • FEB Mission
  • Satisfy contractual obligations for
    company-level, independent oversight (10CFR830,
    DOE O226.1)
  • Provide accurate, consistent, and graded
    performance assessments
  • Evaluate adequacy of line self-assessment
    practices
  • Provide facility, project, and program support
    services

Keep It Simple
2
3
WSRC Facility Evaluation Board (FEB)
  • Basic Concepts
  • Independence report to WSRC President
  • Experienced and trained personnel
  • Performance-based, evolution-based
  • Regular and thorough evaluations
  • Evaluate by ISM Functions and Principles
  • Consistent Criteria, tailored as appropriate
  • Close the loop on corrective actions

Critical Attributes
3
4
WSRC Facility Evaluation Board (FEB)
  • FEB Evolution

Process Flexibility
4
5
WSRC Facility Evaluation Board (FEB)
  • Personnel Are The Key
  • Field experienced and credible
  • Technically and FEB process qualified
  • Interactive skills
  • Communication skills
  • Rotational assignments employee development

PeoplePeoplePeople
5
6
WSRC Facility Evaluation Board (FEB)
FEB Teams
Form Follows Function
6
7
WSRC Facility Evaluation Board (FEB)
Unannounced Schedule
7
8
WSRC Facility Evaluation Board (FEB)
Time Line
Drive-Bys Do Not Work
8
9
WSRC Facility Evaluation Board (FEB)
  • Keys To Success
  • WSRC Presidential process ownership
  • Process credibility
  • DOE/NNSA support
  • Senior management support
  • Team member selection
  • Independence
  • Willingness to evolve the process
  • Validation of credibility by external agencies

The Boss Has to Own It
9
10
WSRC Facility Evaluation Board (FEB)
  • FEB Benefits
  • Sustained performance improvement
  • Support for facility and program customers
  • Effective nuclear activity startup readiness
  • Support for parent corporation
  • Employee development
  • Customer credibility

Process Must Add Value
10
11
WSRC Facility Evaluation Board (FEB)
  • Process Validation
  • WSRC President
  • Customer DOESRS and DOE HQ
  • DNFSB
  • Parent Corporation (Washington Group
    International, Energy Environment, National
    Safety Council)
  • Institute of Nuclear Operations (INPO)
  • Evaluated Customers (Facilities and Programs)

External Validation is Critical
11
12
WSRC Facility Evaluation Board (FEB)
  • External Positive Feedback
  • EH2 NotedFEB evaluations are comprehensive,
    well documented, and effective in identifying
    strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement
    and DOE-SR has decided to rely on the FEB to
    verify that the contractor maintains the ISMS, as
    opposed to conducting its own annual or periodic
    ISMS verifications.
  • INPO NotedThe FEB provides valuable,
    independent insight into how well organizations
    are performing and the FEB is performing well
    and helping to move organizations evaluated to
    higher levels of performance.

Independent Feedback
12
13
WSRC Facility Evaluation Board (FEB)
  • External Positive Feedback
  • The Director of Office of Price-Anderson
    Enforcement NotedThe FEB Assessment process
    was noted as a significant strength. Roles and
    responsibilities were established by procedures
    FEB Assessments were thorough, comprehensive,
    identified significant findings, and provided
    follow-up to previously identified issues. FEB
    team leaders were well-qualified, typically
    coming from facility management positions. The
    FEB process appeared to be strongly supported by
    site senior management.
  • Recent DOE-HQ OA Review notedThe WSRC FEB
    process is a noteworthy practice worthy of
    emulation elsewhere in the DOE complex.

Independent Feedback
13
14
Questions
  • Steve Johnson
  • stephen.johnson_at_srs.gov
  • (803)725-4528

14
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com