41

1
41 SeaTow tests (July 30, 2003) Sea State
??? Waypoints Brant Beach (BB) 39 36.917 N
74 11.90 W Loveladies (LL)
39 44.171 N 74 7.029 W
Tuckerton (T) 39 32.615 N 73 58.665 W
LL
O
T
Figure 1. Onboard GPS track for July 30, 2003
SeaTow 41 tests.
2
Figure 2. SeaTow 41. Speed range form 0-30 knots
3
Parameters used for the 41 SeaTow tests (July
30, 2003) Legs 1-4 (1415 GMT 1700
GMT) Loveladies Frequency 4.55 MHz
Bandwidth 50 KHz
Blank 121.6 microsecs Tuckerton
Frequency 4.55 MHz Bandwidth 50
KHz Blank 121.6 microsecs Boat Speed
21-23 knots Leg 1 T-O Leg 2 O-LL Leg 3
LL-O
4
SEATOW 41 FT TEST 30 JULY 2003
Figure 3. Legs 1-3 Detection Data Time vs.
Range, Range Rate, and Bearing
Applied Mathematics, Inc.
5
SEATOW 41 FT TEST 30 JULY 2003
)
Figure 4. Legs 1-3 Detection Data Time vs.
Range, Range Rate, and Bearing Errors
Applied Mathematics, Inc.
6
SEATOW 41 FT TEST 30 JULY 2003
Figure5. Time vs. Range for First Leg 1419.21
1450.21
Figure 6. Time vs. Range Rate for First Leg
1419.21 1450.21
Figure 7. Time vs. Bearing for First Leg
1419.21 1450.21
7
(No Transcript)
8
SEATOW 41 FT TEST 30 JULY 2003
Figure 9. Time vs. Range for Second and Third
Leg 1533.53 1558.38
Figure 10. Time vs. Range Rate for Second and
Third Leg 1533.53 1558.38
Figure 11. Time vs. Bearing for Second and Third
Leg 1533.53 1558.38
9
SEATOW 41 FT TEST 30 JULY 2003
LOVELADIES


x
x
TUCKERTON
Figure 12. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker
Solution for Second and Third Leg 1533.53
1558.38
10
25 SeaTow tests (October 8, 2003) Sea State
Glassy, 1-2 swell (15sec) Waypoints Brant
Beach (BB) 39 36.917 N 74 11.90 W
Loveladies (LL) 39 44.171 N 74
7.029 W Offshore (O) 39
35.72 N 73 57.88 W
LL
BB
O
Figure 13. Onboard GPS track for October 8, 2003
SeaTow 25 tests.
11
Figure 14. SeaTow 25. Speed range form 0-40 knots
12
Parameters used for the 25 SeaTow tests (October
8, 2003) Legs ABCD (1313 GMT 1525
GMT) Loveladies Frequency 4.55 MHz
Bandwidth 50KHz
Blank 121.6 microsecs Brant
Beach Frequency 24.7 MHz
Bandwidth 50 KHz Blank 121.6
microsecs Legs EFGH (1545 GMT 1750
GMT) Loveladies Frequency 4.55 MHz
Bandwidth 50KHz
Blank 240.8 microsecs Brant
Beach Frequency 24.7 MHz
Bandwidth 50 KHz Blank 240.8
microsecs Boat Speed 23-26 knots Leg A/E
BB-O Leg B/F O-LL Leg C/G LL-O Leg D/H O-BB
13
Figure 15. Brant Beach detections for legs ABCD
for (a) range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.
14
Figure 16. Brant Beach SNR for legs ABCD for (a)
range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.
15
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 17. Time vs. Range for Leg A 1337.00
1351.00
Figure 18. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg A
1337.00 1351.00
Figure 19. Time vs. Bearing for Leg A 1337.00
1351.00
16
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 20. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker
Solution for Leg A 1337.00 1351.00
17
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 21. Time vs. Range for Leg D 1511.15
1524.15
Figure 22. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg D
1511.15 1524.15
Figure 23. Time vs. Bearing for Leg D 1511.15
1524.15
18
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 24. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker
Solution for Leg D 1511.15 1524.15
19
Figure 25. Loveladies detections for legs ABCD
for (a) range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.
20
Figure 26. Loveladies SNR for legs ABCD for (a)
range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.
21
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 27. Time vs. Range for Leg B 1416.33
1424.03
Figure 28. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg B
1416.33 1424.03
Figure 29. Time vs. Bearing for Leg B 1416.33
1424.03
22
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 30. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker
Solution for Leg B 1416.33 1424.03
23
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 31. Time vs. Range for Leg C 1430.27
1448.42
Figure 32. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg C
1430.27 1448.42
Figure 33. Time vs. Bearing for Leg C 1430.27
1448.42
24
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 34. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker
Solution for Leg C 1430.27 1448.42
25
Figure 35. Brant Beach detections for legs EFGH
for (a) range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.
26
Figure 36. Brant Beach SNR for legs EFGH for (a)
range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.
27
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 37. Time vs. Range for Leg E 1548.35
1620.10
Figure 38. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg E
1548.35 1620.10
Figure 39. Time vs. Bearing for Leg E 1548.35
1620.10
28
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 40. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker
Solution for Leg E 1548.35 1620.10
29
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 32. Time vs. Range for Leg C 1430.27
1448.42
Figure 41. Time vs. Range for Leg H 1728.18
1748.03
Figure 42. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg H
1728.18 1748.03
Figure 43. Time vs. Bearing for Leg H 1728.18
1748.03
30
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 44. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker
Solution for Leg H 1728.18 1748.03
31
Figure 45. Loveladies detections for legs EFGH
for (a) range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.
32
Figure 46. Loveladies SNR for legs EFGH for (a)
range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.
33
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 47. Time vs. Range for Leg F 1637.21
1642.51
Figure 48. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg F
1637.21 1642.51
Figure 49. Time vs. Bearing for Leg F 1637.21
1642.51
34
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 50. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker
Solution for Leg F 1637.21 1642.51
35
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 51. Time vs. Range for Leg C 1430.27
1448.42
Figure 52. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg C
1430.27 1448.42
Figure 53. Time vs. Bearing for Leg C 1430.27
1448.42
36
SEATOW 25 FT TEST 8 OCTOBER 2003
Figure 54. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker
Solution for Leg C 1430.27 1448.42
37
SeaTow 25 Brant Beach Detections 121 Blank (Run 1)
38
SeaTow 25 Brant Beach Detections 121 Blank (Run 1)
39
SeaTow 25 Loveladies Detections 121 Blank (Run 1)
40
SeaTow 25 Loveladies Detections 121 Blank (Run 1)
41
SeaTow 25 Brant Beach Detections 240 Blank (Run 2)
42
SeaTow 25 Brant Beach Detections 240 Blank (Run 2)
43
SeaTow 25 Loveladies Detections 240 Blank (Run 2)
44
SeaTow 25 Loveladies Detections 240 Blank (Run 2)