Trials and Juries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Trials and Juries

Description:

Method for excusing a potential juror without specifying the reason. A means for both sides to remove an otherwise qualified juror ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: rickmic
Category:
Tags: juries | juror | trials

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Trials and Juries


1
Trials and Juries
  • Dr. Michelle L. Meloy

2
Constitutional Right to a Jury Trial
  • Jury trials are mentioned three times in the U.S.
    Constitution
  • Jury trials are designed to protect citizen
    against vindictive prosecutors or distrusted
    judges
  • 6th amendment defendant has a right to a speedy,
    public trial by an impartial jury
  • Mentioned also in the 7th amendment and
    incorporated into the 14 amendement

3
Background on juries
  • Trial by jury has a long history
  • First used in Athens, Greece (5 or 6 centuries
    B.C.) then Rome, then France (9th century) and
    then England
  • Idea that juries function as impartial fact
    finding bodies formalized in Magna Carta 1215,
    England

4
Jury Size
  • Historical accident that juries usually 12
    persons
  • 6th amendment does not require 12 person juries
    or unanimous verdicts
  • U.S.S.C case law has defined the context and
    scope of these rights
  • Federal system is entitled to a 12-person jury
  • Six person juries are constitutional in the
    states, except in capital cases.
  • Fewer than 6 jurors on a panel is
    unconstitutional.

5
Jury Rulings Unanimous?
  • U.S. Supreme Court case law has determined
  • Federal criminal juries must be unanimous.
  • There is no federal requirement that state juries
    must be unanimous.
  • State courts may use 9-3 or 10-2 verdicts
  • Six member juries must be unanimous
  • Only five states use non-unanimous verdicts

6
Non-unanimous verdicts and small jury sizes?
  • Problems?
  • What are some potential due process concerns with
    these forms of law in action?

7
Law on the Books Selecting a Fair Jury
  • Trials can be won or lost in jury selection
    process
  • Three steps
  • Master Jury List First step
  • Where do these list come from?
  • Who is included? Excluded?
  • Venire Selecting the jury pool
  • Voir Dire To Speak the truth!
  • Challenge for Cause unlimited
  • Peremptory Challenge limited

8
Peremptory Challenges
  • Method for excusing a potential juror without
    specifying the reason
  • A means for both sides to remove an otherwise
    qualified juror
  • U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that neither side
    can dismiss a potential juror based solely on
    race or gender
  • Death row inmates have received new trials by
    appellate courts because of racial bias during
    jury selection (2005)

9
Steps of the Criminal Trial
  • Two types of trials
  • Bench
  • Jury
  • Jury Selection
  • Opening Statements
  • Prosecution Case in Chief
  • Direct Examination
  • Cross Examination
  • Redirect

10
Steps of the Criminal Trial Continued ...
  • Defense Case in Chief
  • Direct Examination
  • Cross-Examination
  • Redirect
  • Rebuttal
  • Closing Arguments
  • Jury Instructions
  • Jury Deliberations
  • Verdict
  • Post-verdict Motions

11
Burden of Proof in a Trial
  • Prosecution must prove defendants guilt beyond a
    reasonable doubt
  • Reasonable doubt legal yardstick measuring
    sufficiency of evidence
  • Absolute certainty not required!
  • Defense need not prove anything and therefore
    need not present any evidence.

12
Types of Evidence
  • Introduction of all trial evidence is dictated by
    specific principles. Types of evidence include
  • Real Evidence
  • Things that are tangible.
  • Gun, knife, documents, etc.
  • Testimony
  • Statements by competent witnesses.
  • Direct Evidence
  • Usually Eyewitness Testimony.
  • Indirect Evidence
  • Circumstantial Evidence Inference made from
    evidence.

13
Rules of Evidence Trustworthiness
  • Judge must decide whether a trial would be more
    fair with or without the evidence
  • Best-Evidence Rule
  • Usually only the original document or object is
    admissible.
  • A witness may be too young to be competent
  • Hearsay Evidence
  • Secondhand not based on personal knowledge
  • A repetition of what another person has said
    outside of court.
  • Generally excluded from trial i.e., dying
    declarations

14
Rules of Evidence Relevancy
  • Evidence must also be relevant
  • Must be a valid reason for introducing the
    statement, object, or testimony.
  • Evidence not related to an issue at trial is
    immaterial or irrelevant.
  • Information about a defendants character may be
    used to impeach his or her testimony.

15
Scientific Evidence
  • Not all scientific evidence is admissible.
  • Polygraphs not accepted in court.
  • Hypnosis not accepted in court.
  • General acceptance test was standard for 70 years
    but no longer
  • Judges must be active in screening admission of
    scientific evidence

16
Defenses
  • Alibi Defenses
  • Defendant was elsewhere at the time of crime
  • Affirmative Defenses
  • Self-Defense
  • Duress
  • Entrapment
  • Insanity
  • Diminished Responsibility/Capacity

17
Insanity Defense
  • McNaughton Rule Accused not able to distinguish
    between right and wrong. Oldest most
    restrictive
  • Irresistible Impulse Person driven to commit act
    by an urge that cannot be resisted or overcome
    because mental disease or derangement
  • Substantial Capacity Test Person not responsible
    if a mental illness keeps them from appreciating
    the criminality of the conduct or this defect
    makes it impossible for them to conform the law
    (most common)
  • Bottom-line Rarely used and rarely successful

18
Jury Related Issues
  • Venue
  • Jurisdiction of the court.
  • Change of venue motions
  • Motion made a party to the lawsuit to change the
    place where the case is supposed to tried. Often
    requested when there is a lot of pretrial
    publicity.
  • Gag Order
  • Forbidding those involved in the case from
    talking to the press.
  • Contempt of Court
  • A violation of a Judges order.

19
Jury Issues Continued
  • Jury Nullification the right of juries to
    nullify or refuse to apply law in criminal cases
    despite facts that leave no reasonable doubt that
    the law was violated.
  • Jury Sequestering to isolate members of a jury
    from the community until they have reached a
    final verdict.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com