International Strategic Alliances: Design and Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

International Strategic Alliances: Design and Management

Description:

Popular in high tech industries because of high costs and risks ... Benevolent trust: confidence that the partner will behave with goodwill and with fair exchange ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:173
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: crabRu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: International Strategic Alliances: Design and Management


1
8
  • International Strategic Alliances Design and
    Management

2
Strategic Alliances Issues
  • Popular strategy to develop new product and to
    expand into new markets
  • However, strategic alliances are very risky and
    unstable
  • Failure rate of 30 to 60

3
Where to Link in the Value Chain
  • Alliance combining same value-chain activities
    are to gain efficiencies, merge talents, or share
    risks
  • In operations alliances MNC combine manufacturing
    activities to reach economies of scale
  • Operations/marketing alliances provide access to
    markets

4
Choosing a Partner The Most Important Choice?
  • A key criteria is strategic complementarity
  • Pick a partner with complementary skills that
    enhances but does not necessarily duplicate an
    alliance partners skills
  • Seek out compatible management styles
  • Seek a partner that will provide the right
    level of mutual dependency

5
Criteria for Choosing Partners
  • Avoid the anchor partner one that holds back
    the strategic alliance because it cannot or will
    not provide its share of the funding
  • Be cautious of the elephant-and-ant complex
    that occurs when two companies are greatly
    unequal in size
  • Assess operating-policy differences with
    potential partners
  • Assess the difficulty of cross-cultural
    communication

6
Choosing an Alliance Type
  • Three main types of strategic alliances
  • Informal international cooperative alliances
  • Formal international cooperative alliances
  • International joint venture

7
1. Informal International Cooperative Alliance
  • Non-legally binding agreements between companies
    from two or more countries
  • Agreements of any kind
  • Provide links anywhere on their value chains
  • Limited involvement between companies

8
2. Formal Cooperative Alliances
  • Higher degree of involvement than informal
    alliances
  • Formal contract
  • Popular in high tech industries because of high
    costs and risks

9
3. International Joint Ventures (IJV)
  • Separate legal entity owned by two or more parent
    companies from different countries
  • No need for equal ownership
  • Equity based on cash or other contributions
  • Ex. One partner brings technology while other
    partner brings financial contributions

10
Negotiating the Agreement
  • The formal agreement is not as important as the
    ability of managers to get along
  • IJV negotiation issues
  • equity contributions
  • management structure
  • prenuptial agreements

11
Organizational Design in Strategic Alliances
  • Depends on the type of alliance chosen
  • Informal ICAs often have no formal design issues
  • Formal ICAs may require separate organization
    unit housed in one company
  • IJVParent companies set up separate legal entity

12
Decision-making Control
  • Two areas need to be considered
  • Operational decisions (focus on day to day
    running)
  • Strategic decisions (focus on long term survival)
  • Majority ownership does not necessarily control
  • In IJVs, strategic decision making takes place at
    the level of IJVs board of directors or top
    management.

13
Management Structures
  • Dominant parent controls or dominates strategic
    and operating decision making
  • Often has majority ownership
  • Treats the IJV as wholly owned subsidiary
  • Shared management both parent companies
    contribute approximately the same number of
    managers to the alliance organization
  • Split control management control partners
    usually share strategic decision making but split
    functional decision making

14
Management Structures (Cont.)
  • Independent management structure alliance
    managers act more like managers from a separate
    company
  • IJVs often recruit managers from outside the
    parent companies
  • Rotating management key positions rotate among
    partners
  • Popular in developing countries
  • Serves to train management talent and transfer
    expertise to developing country

15
Choosing a Strategic Alliance Management Structure
  • If one partner has dominant equity position then
  • Dominant management structure more likely
  • If partners have similar technologies or know-how
    and contribute equally then
  • Shared management structure preferred
  • If partners have different technologies but
    contribute equally then
  • Split management structure preferred

16
Human Resource Management in Strategic Alliances
  • HRM functions include recruiting and staffing for
    all alliance positions
  • The HRM functions of an IJV are more complex
  • Managers (and sometimes workers) come from two or
    more firms or from two or more cultures

17
Critical HRM Problems and Issues
  • HRM planning Must communicate to all employees
    the strategic intent of alliance.
  • Parent involvement As alliances get older and
    larger, they tend to develop their own HRM
    practices.
  • Staffing the alliance management and technical
    personnel Crucial and risky decision. Must not
    unload unwanted managers to alliance.
  • Staffing the alliance workforce Assess local
    labor supply
  • Performance assessment Needed for retention,
    promotion and salary decisions. Avoid adopting
    the system of one partner.
  • Loyalty Managers may often feel dual loyalty to
    parent and to alliance
  • Career development Must provide clear
    information on how alliance assignments fit
    within careers. Career ladder must exist within
    the IJV
  • Cultural differences
  • Training

18
Commitment and Trust
  • Commitment and trust go hand in hand
  • Commitment putting forth extra effort to make
    the venture work and taking care of each other
  • Facets of commitment
  • Attitudinal commitment willingness to dedicate
    resources and efforts and face risks to make the
    alliance work
  • Calculative commitment the practical side
    related to the alliance partner evaluations,
    expectations, and concerns regarding potential
    rewards from the relationship

19
Commitment and Trust
  • Trust The confidence that the partner will
    deliver on the expected contributions to the
    alliance
  • Two types
  • Credibility trust confidence that the partner
    has the intent and ability to meet promised
    obligations and contributions to the alliance
  • Benevolent trust confidence that the partner
    will behave with goodwill and with fair exchange

20
Why Is Trust Important?
  • When there is no trust, partners hold back or
    take advantage of each other (Opportunistic
    Behavior).
  • Formal contracts can never identify all issues
    that will arise
  • Technology and knowledge also include tacit
    elements that can only be learned through trust.

21
Building and Sustaining Trust and Commitment
  • Pick your partner carefully
  • Know each sides strategic goals
  • Seek win-win situations. Maintain a balance in
    which side gains from the alliance
  • Go slowly problems will arise and take time to
    work out.
  • Invest in cross-cultural training
  • Invest in direct communication
  • Find the right levels of trust and commitment

22
Assessing the Performance of an International
Strategic Alliance
  • If strategic intent is to produce immediate
    results, standard financial and efficiency
    measures can be used. (e.g., profit center)
  • Some alliances provide indirect strategic
    benefits.
  • IJV and ICA performance criteria
  • Often must include criteria other than financial,
    such as organizational learning.

23
If the Alliance Does Not Work
  • Negotiate an end or improve implementation
  • Know when to quit / invest more
  • Avoid escalation of commitment
  • Companies continue in an alliance longer than
    necessary because of financial and emotional
    investments.
  • Plan endprenuptial agreements
  • Death not always failure. Some alliance are
    suppose to be short term

24
CONCLUSION
  • Alliances are important and will continue to grow
  • Key is to pick the right partner
  • Partners negotiate the structure that support
    their strategic intent
  • There must be agreement to HRM practices
  • Trust and commitment are basic foundations for
    successful alliances
  • Alliance performance is difficult to determine
  • Usually learning and market penetration can be
    used as performance measures
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com