Studying experiences from the perspective of students with disability at the University of Zagreb - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Studying experiences from the perspective of students with disability at the University of Zagreb

Description:

... with stuff from students' office (From:'Whatever I need I feel free to drop ... free transportation; fondations; student service for. part time work. public ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: kurb8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Studying experiences from the perspective of students with disability at the University of Zagreb


1
Studying experiences from the perspective of
students with disability at the University of
Zagreb
  • Boena Jermen, social work student
  • Prof. Dr. Sc. Kristina Urbanc
  • Department of Social Work
  • University of Zagreb
  • Croatia
  • kristina.urbanc_at_zg.htnet.hr

2
CONTEXT UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB
  • University of Zagreb has more than 65 000
    students - 200 of them are students with
    disability.
  • In order to enable all potential students with
    disability to study, the University has
    established an Office for students with
    disability, as a referal center where students
    can get all needed information and direct help.
  • Some of defined tasks of the Office are
  • informing students and teachers international
    cooperation, creating a data base about students
    with disabilities activities for increasing
    accesability, meeting specific needs of SD for
    attending lectures and learning (transport,
    adjustment of literature, translation to a sign
    language, personal assistance...) promoting law.
  • Constant support of NGOs as a vital resource.

3
THE RESEARCH
  • The main goal of the study was to explore
    experiences of studying at the University of
    Zagreb from the perspective of students with
    disability.
  • We were interested in examples of good practice
    and our research question was focused on what was
    helpful for students with disability to continue
    their education on university level, including
    his/her personal and environmental resources
    (such as family, peers, local community,
    university, faculty...).
  • l

4
The research METHOD AND Participants
  • Students with disability in final semester of
    their study were recruited through a written
    invitation, and than through personal contact by
    the researcher, and were asked to join the focus
    group.
  • The focus group method was chosen in order to
    explore different aspects of experiences through
    the perspective of students with disability, to
    expand our understanding of the challenges of
    being a student with disabilityand to develop
    some further steps in promoting equal
    opportunities in higher education at the
    University of Zagreb

5
THE SAMPLING PROCESS
  • The criteria for the choice of participants
    their motivation for participation, accomodation
    on the area of campus - students dormitories
    and their perennial experience of studying at the
    University of Zagreb.
  • Having in mind the research objective, we assumed
    that such users would present information-rich
    cases. It is a purposive sample which consisted
    of 10 participants.
  • Two focus groups were carried-out, one consisting
    of blind students and students with visual
    impairment (FG1, 1 male 4 female) and the other
    students with experience of physical disability
    (FG2, 4 male 1 female).

6
RESEARCH QUESTIONS WERE FOCUSED ON THE FOLLOWING
AREAS
  • Participants explanation of motives for HE
  • Their experience of the very beginning of
    studying
  • Class attendance, studying and exams
  • Life on students campus
  • Being informed
  • Formal resources of help
  • Recommandations for improvement in future

7
QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS
  • A qualitative data analysis of participants
    statements was conducted by using the procedure
    of open coding (Mesec, 1998 Maxwell, 1996
    Strauss and Corbin, 1990).
  • Open coding procedure consisted of the following
    identifying particular terms in data and
    labelling and grouping them around the same
    research questions.
  • Further steps included categorisation of terms,
    naming the categories at the more abstract level
    than the one they denote and analysis of their
    meaning.

8
FINDINGS MOTIVES FOR HE - NOTIONS AND CATEGORIES
  • Resources
  • Personal resources interests for specific area
    communication skills, some personal
    characteristics (not quitting easily, desire for
    achievement and for university degree)
  • Quality of the vision of future life better
    chances with diploma not having chances to be
    employed with just HS degree at all and not
    feeling ready to work after HS
  • Barriers in a career choice
  • Due to having visual impairment or being blind
    (natural sciences, mathematics)
  • Due to capacities and organisation of each single
    faculty (psychology)
  • The role of the environment
  • Discouraging - teachers and family members
    against continuing HE
  • Supporting teachers from HS, encouraging and
    helping preparations for HE

9
THE BEGINNING OF STUDY
  • Emotional experiences of the beginners from
    feeling euphoric, challenged, adventurous to
    chaos, fear, feeling of being trapped
    difficulties with being on your own, lack of
    motivation for learning
  • Importance of orientation sessions (professional
    help, association for the Education of Guide Dogs
    and Mobility, peer help), assistive technology in
    lecture attendance and regular transportation
    service
  • Differences in entering exams due to
    inappropriate accessibility of rooms
  • The staff/teachers unprepared for SWD being
    irritated by explaining, telling the story from
    the beginning to every single teacher and taking
    individual initiatives
  • Avoiding to ask for help due to bad formal
    experiences

10
CLASS ATTENDANCE, STUDYING AND EXAMS BASED ON
STUDENT-TEACHER RELATIONSHIP



Positively oriented, flexible attitude Teachers
gradually getting used to the needs of
SWD Formal experiences with SWD (Dept. Of
psychology, sociology) High level of personal
engagement indiv. approach Adjusted way and
time of evaluation

Discriminative attitude Lower criteria on exams
for SWD Using defensive terminology Unequal
exam conditions unable to cheat during written
exam?
Motivated to help SWD but not informed, educated
or skilled enough Indifferent, ignoring
attitude not supportive but not discourageing
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Accessibility of rooms and informations
  • Mostly relying on fellow students not all
    classrooms/toilets accessible elevator often out
    of order chairs and desks often fixed on the
    floor.
  • Key role of fellow students in keeping SWD
    informed (I cannot read information sheets from
    the board on the wall, and I often miss some key
    issues)
  • Extremly good/bad experiences with stuff from
    students office (FromWhatever I need I feel
    free to drop by and aks, They are more than
    nice to me... to Oh, not you, not again...what
    do you need this time?)
  • Positive experiences on Faculty of philosophy due
    to sensitive leadership ( Faculty of philosophy
    has an advantage the vicedean has a son with
    disability...and before him there was a dean
    whose child has cerebral palsy...so they know...)

14
(No Transcript)
15
Recommendations for the future (1)
  • Developing educational policy for SWD
  • (I listened to the Belgian lecturer on the
    conference last december...there are some 14 or
    17 basic prerequests to be covered in order to
    make HE accessible for SWD, and we have hardly
    covered 2 of them...We need Ministry and
    University to define clear policy of education)
  • Doubts about professional competencies for SWD
  • (It often happens that on some faculties SWD are
    getting free of some important tasks, due to
    their disability and they are not fully
    competent, according to the degree they get. It
    should be reconsidered)

16
Recommendations for the future (2)
  • Need for better cooperation and dialogue among
    different institutions and NGOs
  • Theres more than enough work for all of them,
    I don t know why they cant stand each other...
  • They are here for us, not vice versa, and they
    should agree upon some things...otherwise, it
    happens that one notebook is skenned twice, its
    costs are doubled...
  • The aim is to improve life and education quality
    for SWD, not a personal promotion...

17
Recommendations for the future (3)
  • Institutionalisation of rights (personal
    assistance transportation, accessability,
    assistive technology)
  • It means, not depending on projects and wheather
    it is going to be approved or not...
  • Our transport service (NGO) works till 4 p.m.
    And we have lectures till 6 or even 8 because of
    the lack of money it is not covered for the whole
    day.
  • To have more stable and predictable financial
    support for NGOs which deal with transportation
    for SWD
  • ...instead of making a big deal out of it during
    election campaign

18
Recommendations for the future (4)
  • Improving the use of the National University
    Library faculty libraries better prepaired for
    SWD
  • The library on Faculty of Philosophy has very
    sensitive staff, and also part time help of
    fellow students...at the moment they see you are
    a SWD they will be ready to give you a hand
  • Need for staff training - it is far more
    difficult for persons without visible disability
  • I used to explain to the librarian in the NUL
    that I could barely see, and she kept wondering
    if that was so. She does not understand.
  • It is different if you are a blind person,
    people will say to you Can I help you?. But
    if you have glasses, they think, its O.K., she
    can see.

19
Recommendations for the future (5)
  • Establishing boards/committees for SWD on each
    faculty
  • Improving communication with the Office for SWD
  • Reducing bureaucratic issues
  • Most of us have diagnoses that would not be
    changed, still every month one has to prove
    this fact by carrying around a bunch of papers
    the health insurance office is on the 1st floor,
    and, of course, no lift is available...

20
INSTITUTIONAL AND PERSONAL LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT
  • Systematic approach to improve accessibility
    (approach, entrance, classrooms, toilets,
    libraries, teaching materials, traffic,
    information) taking institutional
    responsibility for institutional and individual
    empowerment of non-traditional students
    developing a new tradition.
  • Personal commitment of teachers (Personal is
    political)
  • Heart and mind approach - only intellectual
    view of understanding is not enough to maintain
    the process of changing in a positive direction
    it takes also emotional, personal, irrational,
    creative levels of understanding (both sides of
    our brains) to make an important issue out of it
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com