Title: Studying experiences from the perspective of students with disability at the University of Zagreb
1Studying experiences from the perspective of
students with disability at the University of
Zagreb
- Boena Jermen, social work student
- Prof. Dr. Sc. Kristina Urbanc
- Department of Social Work
- University of Zagreb
- Croatia
- kristina.urbanc_at_zg.htnet.hr
2CONTEXT UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB
- University of Zagreb has more than 65 000
students - 200 of them are students with
disability. - In order to enable all potential students with
disability to study, the University has
established an Office for students with
disability, as a referal center where students
can get all needed information and direct help. - Some of defined tasks of the Office are
- informing students and teachers international
cooperation, creating a data base about students
with disabilities activities for increasing
accesability, meeting specific needs of SD for
attending lectures and learning (transport,
adjustment of literature, translation to a sign
language, personal assistance...) promoting law. - Constant support of NGOs as a vital resource.
3THE RESEARCH
- The main goal of the study was to explore
experiences of studying at the University of
Zagreb from the perspective of students with
disability. - We were interested in examples of good practice
and our research question was focused on what was
helpful for students with disability to continue
their education on university level, including
his/her personal and environmental resources
(such as family, peers, local community,
university, faculty...). -
- l
4The research METHOD AND Participants
- Students with disability in final semester of
their study were recruited through a written
invitation, and than through personal contact by
the researcher, and were asked to join the focus
group. - The focus group method was chosen in order to
explore different aspects of experiences through
the perspective of students with disability, to
expand our understanding of the challenges of
being a student with disabilityand to develop
some further steps in promoting equal
opportunities in higher education at the
University of Zagreb
5THE SAMPLING PROCESS
- The criteria for the choice of participants
their motivation for participation, accomodation
on the area of campus - students dormitories
and their perennial experience of studying at the
University of Zagreb. - Having in mind the research objective, we assumed
that such users would present information-rich
cases. It is a purposive sample which consisted
of 10 participants. - Two focus groups were carried-out, one consisting
of blind students and students with visual
impairment (FG1, 1 male 4 female) and the other
students with experience of physical disability
(FG2, 4 male 1 female).
6RESEARCH QUESTIONS WERE FOCUSED ON THE FOLLOWING
AREAS
- Participants explanation of motives for HE
- Their experience of the very beginning of
studying - Class attendance, studying and exams
- Life on students campus
- Being informed
- Formal resources of help
- Recommandations for improvement in future
7QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS
- A qualitative data analysis of participants
statements was conducted by using the procedure
of open coding (Mesec, 1998 Maxwell, 1996
Strauss and Corbin, 1990). - Open coding procedure consisted of the following
identifying particular terms in data and
labelling and grouping them around the same
research questions. - Further steps included categorisation of terms,
naming the categories at the more abstract level
than the one they denote and analysis of their
meaning.
8FINDINGS MOTIVES FOR HE - NOTIONS AND CATEGORIES
- Resources
- Personal resources interests for specific area
communication skills, some personal
characteristics (not quitting easily, desire for
achievement and for university degree) - Quality of the vision of future life better
chances with diploma not having chances to be
employed with just HS degree at all and not
feeling ready to work after HS - Barriers in a career choice
- Due to having visual impairment or being blind
(natural sciences, mathematics) - Due to capacities and organisation of each single
faculty (psychology) - The role of the environment
- Discouraging - teachers and family members
against continuing HE - Supporting teachers from HS, encouraging and
helping preparations for HE
9THE BEGINNING OF STUDY
- Emotional experiences of the beginners from
feeling euphoric, challenged, adventurous to
chaos, fear, feeling of being trapped
difficulties with being on your own, lack of
motivation for learning - Importance of orientation sessions (professional
help, association for the Education of Guide Dogs
and Mobility, peer help), assistive technology in
lecture attendance and regular transportation
service - Differences in entering exams due to
inappropriate accessibility of rooms - The staff/teachers unprepared for SWD being
irritated by explaining, telling the story from
the beginning to every single teacher and taking
individual initiatives - Avoiding to ask for help due to bad formal
experiences
10CLASS ATTENDANCE, STUDYING AND EXAMS BASED ON
STUDENT-TEACHER RELATIONSHIP
Positively oriented, flexible attitude Teachers
gradually getting used to the needs of
SWD Formal experiences with SWD (Dept. Of
psychology, sociology) High level of personal
engagement indiv. approach Adjusted way and
time of evaluation
Discriminative attitude Lower criteria on exams
for SWD Using defensive terminology Unequal
exam conditions unable to cheat during written
exam?
Motivated to help SWD but not informed, educated
or skilled enough Indifferent, ignoring
attitude not supportive but not discourageing
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13Accessibility of rooms and informations
- Mostly relying on fellow students not all
classrooms/toilets accessible elevator often out
of order chairs and desks often fixed on the
floor. - Key role of fellow students in keeping SWD
informed (I cannot read information sheets from
the board on the wall, and I often miss some key
issues) - Extremly good/bad experiences with stuff from
students office (FromWhatever I need I feel
free to drop by and aks, They are more than
nice to me... to Oh, not you, not again...what
do you need this time?) - Positive experiences on Faculty of philosophy due
to sensitive leadership ( Faculty of philosophy
has an advantage the vicedean has a son with
disability...and before him there was a dean
whose child has cerebral palsy...so they know...)
14(No Transcript)
15Recommendations for the future (1)
- Developing educational policy for SWD
- (I listened to the Belgian lecturer on the
conference last december...there are some 14 or
17 basic prerequests to be covered in order to
make HE accessible for SWD, and we have hardly
covered 2 of them...We need Ministry and
University to define clear policy of education) - Doubts about professional competencies for SWD
- (It often happens that on some faculties SWD are
getting free of some important tasks, due to
their disability and they are not fully
competent, according to the degree they get. It
should be reconsidered)
16Recommendations for the future (2)
- Need for better cooperation and dialogue among
different institutions and NGOs - Theres more than enough work for all of them,
I don t know why they cant stand each other... - They are here for us, not vice versa, and they
should agree upon some things...otherwise, it
happens that one notebook is skenned twice, its
costs are doubled... - The aim is to improve life and education quality
for SWD, not a personal promotion...
17Recommendations for the future (3)
- Institutionalisation of rights (personal
assistance transportation, accessability,
assistive technology) - It means, not depending on projects and wheather
it is going to be approved or not... - Our transport service (NGO) works till 4 p.m.
And we have lectures till 6 or even 8 because of
the lack of money it is not covered for the whole
day. - To have more stable and predictable financial
support for NGOs which deal with transportation
for SWD - ...instead of making a big deal out of it during
election campaign
18Recommendations for the future (4)
- Improving the use of the National University
Library faculty libraries better prepaired for
SWD - The library on Faculty of Philosophy has very
sensitive staff, and also part time help of
fellow students...at the moment they see you are
a SWD they will be ready to give you a hand - Need for staff training - it is far more
difficult for persons without visible disability - I used to explain to the librarian in the NUL
that I could barely see, and she kept wondering
if that was so. She does not understand. - It is different if you are a blind person,
people will say to you Can I help you?. But
if you have glasses, they think, its O.K., she
can see.
19Recommendations for the future (5)
- Establishing boards/committees for SWD on each
faculty - Improving communication with the Office for SWD
- Reducing bureaucratic issues
- Most of us have diagnoses that would not be
changed, still every month one has to prove
this fact by carrying around a bunch of papers
the health insurance office is on the 1st floor,
and, of course, no lift is available...
20INSTITUTIONAL AND PERSONAL LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT
- Systematic approach to improve accessibility
(approach, entrance, classrooms, toilets,
libraries, teaching materials, traffic,
information) taking institutional
responsibility for institutional and individual
empowerment of non-traditional students
developing a new tradition. - Personal commitment of teachers (Personal is
political) - Heart and mind approach - only intellectual
view of understanding is not enough to maintain
the process of changing in a positive direction
it takes also emotional, personal, irrational,
creative levels of understanding (both sides of
our brains) to make an important issue out of it