Prospects for a Global Heterogeneous Telescope Network HTN PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 28
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Prospects for a Global Heterogeneous Telescope Network HTN


1
Prospects for a Global Heterogeneous Telescope
Network (HTN)
  • Frederic V. Rick Hessman
  • Georg-August-Universität Göttingen

2
Now is the Time
  • Scientific need
  • Service-mode observations becoming standard at
    many observatories
  • Large number of increasingly functional robotic
    telescopes
  • Virtual Observatory applications/links

3
Purpose of a HTN
  • Sharing disparate resources
  • e.g. location, aperture, instruments,
    availability
  • Coherent scientific projects requiring extended
    time-/wavelength-/latitude-coverage
  • Better use of resources
  • Educational/Public outreach applications

4
Structure of a HTN
CLIENTS
BROKERS
PROVIDERS
observation descriptions
Info, accounting
data
5
Observation Descriptions
  • Client ? Broker
  • Generic description of observations à la Phase
    III
  • S/N, time, FOV, phase, weather, sky, ...
    constraints
  • Local object and project priorities
  • Broker ? Provider
  • Generic or specific description of observations
  • Constraints
  • Global priorities
  • Provider ? Broker
  • Requests for hole-fillers

6
Info, Accounting, Data
  • Broker ? Client
  • Reporting available global resources
  • Status of requests
  • Data
  • Accounting
  • Provider ? Broker
  • Reporting available local resources
  • Status of requests
  • Data
  • Accounting
  • Availability / Negotiations

7
Constraints on a HTN
  • Client
  • Simple access
  • Reliable performance
  • Prompt communication
  • Quality assurance
  • Provider
  • Security / control
  • Short- vs. Long-term commitments
  • Integration into local/global systems
  • Broker
  • Accounting
  • Dynamic resource management
  • Long-term project management

8
Serving Clients
  • Classic portal solutions
  • Standard eBusiness model/techniques
  • Familiar paradigm
  • Intelligent Agents
  • Quality assurance
  • Access to pipelines
  • Is virtual really good enough?

9
Being a Provider
  • Security / Control
  • Integration into Scheduler
  • Hole fillers
  • Long-term scheduling
  • Registration / broadcasting of allowed
    constraints
  • Instrumentation
  • Registration / broadcasting of current resources
  • Detecting/Dealing with Conflicts of Interest

10
Functions of Brokers
  • Registration of clients and providers
  • Project management
  • Accounting
  • Data quality control
  • Value-added service
  • Commercialization?

11
Practical Issues
  • Most of us are here as potential clients and
    providers - where are the Brokers?
  • Broker role models?
  • Bradford, Univ. Iowa IRTF, Telescopes In
    Education
  • Harvards MicroObservatory, HOU,
    LiverpoolFaulkes
  • eSTAR
  • RAPTOR
  • ACP community
  • RoboSky, TENAGRA
  • ...

12
The MONET Model
  • History
  • Partners Univ. of Texas at Austin SAAO
  • Funding by Krupp Foundation
  • First operation 2005/6
  • McDonald Obs./TX, Sutherland/SA
  • Scientific, Student School Clientele
  • Hardware/Software
  • Administration/Accounting Model

13
Teleskoptechnik Halfmann 1.2m
Unique clam-shell enclosures
14
MONET User- Project-Management
  • Users register themselves but have no access of
    their own
  • Observing time given to Projects with a project
    administrator assigned and a filled
    bank-account of observing time
  • Projects can be sub-divided by the project
    administrators themselves
  • Users attached ( removed) from Projects by
    project administrators
  • Support tools to permit project administrators to
    function as autonomously as possible

15
Difficult HTN Issues
  • Centralized vs. Free Market?
  • What is the currency?
  • What do Providers charge?
  • Timescale for billing?
  • What are the interfaces?
  • How to handle accounting?
  • Are Brokers HTN banks?
  • How much support? (people/pipeline/calibration)

16
Accounting Solutions
  • Client ? Broker
  • Not our topic?
  • Broker ? Provider, Broker ? Broker
  • Checking account model (deposit, withdrawal,
    overdraw)
  • Bargaining conclusive or informal?
  • Professional acknowledgement?
  • Support?
  • Client ? Provider
  • Different business models conceivable
  • Broker service charges?

17
The Stone Age Model
A2B BROKER
CLIENT
CLIENT
DATA A
DATA B
18
The eBay Model
request
estimates
order
data
19
The Mature HTN Economy
billing
CLIENTS
PROVIDERS
donation
CLIENT INTERFACES
BROKERS
20
What is Needed?
  • Interface for resource info collection
  • Interface for observation requests
  • Accepted Currency
  • Pool of trusted Brokers
  • Assessing costs observation requests
  • Interface for brokerage transactions

21
Interface Solution 1 RTML
  • Remote Telescope Markup Language
  • XML format
  • Invented by S. Gordon (LBL) 1989
  • Version 2.1 adopted by open community 2001 (HOU,
    ACP, eSTAR)
  • Version 3.X with schema
  • target namespace www.rtml.org (3.1)
  • Twiki-based schema development environment
  • VOEvent
  • Content
  • Unique document ids
  • Phase I,II information
  • Scheduling constraints
  • Generic and specific descriptions of targets,
    observatories, telescopes, instruments
  • Modes
  • dump resource description
  • request observation request

22
What is Needed?
  • Interface for resource info collection ?
  • Interface for observation requests ?
  • Accepted Currency
  • Pool of trusted Brokers
  • Assessing costs observation requests
  • Interface for brokerage transactions

23
Constraints on HTN Currency
  • Client ideally fixes
  • S/N
  • FOV
  • Seeing, weather, sky constraints
  • Wavelength, spectral resolution, wavelength
    coverage
  • Target time/phase constraints
  • Data product
  • Provider needs compensation for cost of
  • Exposure time
  • Aperture
  • FOV and no. of pixels/resolution elements
  • Complex instruments and expensive wavelengths
  • Data distribution
  • Development and application of data pipelines

24
Defining a Currency
  • IOUs Image Observation Units?
  • e.g. S/N10, texp1 min., D1m, 1 seeing, R5,
    basic calibrations
  • Standard scaling?
  • e.g. fudge texp seeing-2 FOV2
    aperture2.5
  • Provider parameterization?
  • Flat rates?
  • Mixed forms?
  • Real/Virtual Money? (Steele et al., SPIE 2004)
  • Tie to real construction/operation/support costs

25
What is Needed?
  • Interface for resource info collection ?
  • Interface for observation requests ?
  • Accepted Currency ?
  • Pool of trusted Brokers ?
  • Assessing costs observation requests
  • Interface for brokerage transactions

26
Interface Solutions 2 3
  • Cost assessment
  • RTML ? Simulator ? Cost
  • Brokerage Transactions
  • Client ? Agent initial request
  • ltRTML uid? moderequest ...gt
  • Agent ? Provider request for cost estimate
  • ltRTML uidmonet//docs1234 modeinquiry
    ...gt
  • Provider ? Agent report of cost estimate
  • ltCost uidraptor//stuffabcd modeoffer
    urefmonet//docs1234 value3.14
    timestamp2006-02-14T234534
    expires2006-02-15T123456/gt
  • Agent ? Provider order based on cost estimate
  • ltRTML uidmonet//docs1234 moderequest
    ...gt...
  • lthtmCost urefraptor//stuffabcd
    value3.14/gt

27
What is Needed?
  • Interface for resource info collection ?
  • Interface for observation requests ?
  • Accepted Currency ?
  • Pool of trusted Brokers ?
  • Assessing costs observation requests ?
  • Interface for brokerage transactions ?

28
Summary
  • There is an obvious need for HTM
  • Several working initial business models are
    conceivable
  • Modified RTML a simple additional transaction
    interface is all that is needed at first
  • Need lots of discussion at meeting
  • Need potential Providers
  • Need Brokers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com