Title: The Crossover of Directed Donations
1The Crossover of Directed Donations
- Nadine Shehata, Heather Hume, Dale Towns, Barbara
Hannach -
- Canadian Blood Services
2Directed Donations Overview
- Background of the current program
- Rationale for the crossover of directed donations
- Proposals for changes to the current policy
- Policies at regulatory and blood services agencies
3Background
- Program instituted in 1996
- All CBS centres offer the program
- Restricted program- donation is only permitted
- for medical indications
- from a parent/guardian to a child under the age
of 18 years
4Background
- Compatibility is pre-determined at hospitals
- Only parents who are compatible donate
- A unit not used by the intended recipient is
discarded
5Proposed Changes to Expand the Directed Donation
Policy
- CBS is submitting to Health Canada a proposal to
expand the directed donations program - CBSs directed donations program would then be
similar to Hema-Quebecs program
6Proposed Changes in Policy Cross-Over of
Directed Donations
- Crossover of a directed donation not compatible
or not used by the recipient - Donors will meet all the eligibility criteria for
allogeneic donations, except for the limited
exposure program frequency of donation may be
less than 56 days
7 Transfusion Transmissible Disease Markers
- Transfusion-transmissible disease markers were
collected from 10 CBS centres from 1997-2000 - 2,618 donations from 1,884 donors
- Confirmed positive markers compared to allogeneic
markers (1999)
8 Transfusion Transmissible Disease Markers in
Directed Donations (1997-2000) Compared to All
Allogeneic Donations (1999) Canadian Blood
Services
HIVhuman immunodeficiency virus, HTLVhuman
T-lymphotropic virus
9Transfusion Transmissible Disease Markers in
Directed Donations (1997-2000) Compared to First
Time and Repeat Allogeneic Donations (1999)
Canadian Blood Services
FADfirst time allogeneic donation, RADrepeat
allogeneic donation, HIVhuman immunodeficiency
virus, HTLVhuman T- lymphotropic virus
10Transfusion-Transmissible Disease Markers in the
United States1987-1988
Starkey JM et al. JAMA 1989 2623452
11Transfusion-Transmissible Disease Markers in
Australia 1990-1995
Petz L et al. Trans Med 1995 5159-163.
12 Hospital Utilization for Allogeneic and
Directed Donations
FYfiscal year
13Rationale for the Crossover of Directed Donations
- Directed donations are not less safe (nor safer)
than other allogeneic donations. - To optimize utilization
- To potentially increase the number of allogeneic
donors
14The Crossover of Directed Donations for an
Expanded Program Proposal
Compatibility not pre-determined
Directed donation
Not Compatible
Compatible
Directed Recipient
Not required
Crossover
Crossover
15Logistics
- CBS centres
- CBS Head Office
- Hospital Transfusion Medicine
16Information Brochure
- To be amended for the physician, donor and
recipient - Will include additional information on
- compatibility testing
- irradiation of units from a relative
- potential for crossover
17Amendments to Current Consent Forms
Donor
Recipient
- Potential for crossover if not compatible
- Potential for crossover if the unit is not
required
- Potential for crossover if unit is not compatible
or unit is not required - Acceptance of directed donors units
- Irradiation of a unit from a relative
18Projected Yield
- Current program
- An additional 200-400 red cell units/year
- Expanded program
- An additional 300-600 red cell units/ year
19Crossover of Directed Donations Regulatory
Agencies
20Crossover of Directed Donations Blood Services
Agencies
21Crossover of Directed Donations Blood Services
Agencies
22Proposal for the Crossover of Directed Donations
Summary
- Confirmed positive transfusion-transmissible
disease markers for directed donation at CBS are
similar to markers in the United States and
Australia - Discard rates for directed donations are
considerably higher than allogeneic donations
23Proposal for the Crossover of Directed Donations
Summary
- The CBS proposal to allow donors to donate
before compatibility testing and crossover units
that are not compatible or not used, has the
potential of optimizing utilization, and
increasing the number of allogeneic donors