Title: Regulations, Best Practices and Standards
1Regulations, Best Practices and Standards
- How do Current Standards Measure Up?
ACP Garden State Chapter April 2, 2009
Tom Martin tmartin_at_eaglerockalliance.com
2Agenda
- Review of Regulations, Best Practices Standards
- Review of Recent Events
- Specific Focus on BS 25999 NFPA1600
- Compare Contrast The Two Standards
- How to Quantify a Standards Assessment?
3Level Setting Definitions
Regulations (Source Georgetown Law School) A
type of "delegated legislation" promulgated by a
state, federal or local administrative agency
given authority to do so by the appropriate
legislature. Regulations generally are very
specific in nature, they are also referred to as
"rules" or simply "administrative law."
Best Practices (Source Business
Dictionary.COM) Methods and techniques that have
consistently shown results superior than those
achieved with other means, and which are used as
benchmarks to strive for. There is, however, no
practice that is best for everyone or in every
situation, and no best practice remains best for
very long as people keep on finding better ways
of doing things.
Standards (Source International Standards
Organization - ISO)Documented agreements
containing technical specifications or other
precise criteria to be used consistently as
rules, guidelines or definitions of
characteristics, to ensure that materials,
products, processes and services are fit for
their purpose.
4How Do Companies Measure the Performance of
their BCM Program today?
- 71.7 Business Continuity Plan Exercises
- 51.8 Audit Findings
- 31.8 Benchmarking to Industry Norms
- 30.6 Metrics Program
- 22.7 Performance Reviews
- 16.6 Technology Recovery Test Results
- 15.1 Maturity Modeling
- 14 We do not Measure BCM Performance
- 13.8 Service Level Monitoring
- 8.7 Review of Program Capabilities vs. Standards
Source 2008 CI/KPMG BCM Benchmark Survey
5Regulations, Best Practices Standards
- Regulatory (US)
- FFIEC - Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council - OCC - Office of the Controller of the Currency
- FINRA - The Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority - SEC - Securities and Exchange Commission
- HIPAA - Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act - SOX - Sarbanes-Oxley
- Others
- Regulatory (International)
- FSA - Financial Services Authority (UK)
- MAS - Monetary Authority of Singapore
- Basel II G10 Countries (Basel, Switzerland
June 2004)
National regulators indicated they were to
implement Basel II, in some form or another, by
2015.
Basel II attempts to provide regulations about
how much capital banks need to put aside to guard
against the types of financial and operational
risks banks face by setting up rigorous risk and
capital management requirements designed to
ensure that a bank holds capital reserves
appropriate to the risk the bank exposes itself
to through its lending and investment practices.
Generally speaking, these rules mean that the
greater risk to which the bank is exposed, the
greater the amount of capital the bank needs to
hold to safeguard its solvency and overall
economic stability.
6Regulations, Best Practices Standards
- Best Practices
- ASIS International - Preparedness Continuity
Management Best Practice Standard - DRII/BCI - Professional Practices for Business
Continuity Planners - BCI - The BCI Good Practice Guidelines 2007
(United Kingdom) - DRJ/DRII - Generally Accepted Practices (GAP)
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision - High
Level Principles for Business Continuity (2006)
7Regulations, Best Practices Standards
- Standards
- NFPA1600 - Standard on Disaster/Emergency
Management and Business Continuity Programs
(ANSI/US) - BS 25999 - Business Continuity Management
(BSI/UK) - -1 Code of Practice
- -2 Specification
- CSA Z1600 - Standard on Emergency Management and
Business Continuity Programs (Canada) - HB 2922006 - A Practitioners Guide to Business
Continuity Management (Australia) - TR192004 - BCM Framework Technical Reference
(Singapore) - SI 240012007 - Security Continuity Management
Systems (Israel) - ISO/PAS 22399 - Incident Preparedness
Continuity Management (ISO/International) - ISO 24762 Guide for Information and
Communications Technology for Disaster Recovery
(ISO/International) - Title IX PL 110-53 - Voluntary Certification
against yet to be Announced Standards (US)
8Recent Events
- July 2008
- Repligen Corp. (biopharmaceutical) becomes the
first US firm to be certified in BS 25999 - BSI Certification Status
- 22 firms certified worldwide
- 160 active applications
- Standard Poors announced they will enhance
their ratings process for nonfinancial companies
through an enterprise risk management review
(creating a more systematic framework for an
inherently subjective topic) - August 2008
- BS 25777 introduced Code of Practice for
Information and Communications Technology
Continuity - Similar to ISO 24762 Guide for ICT and DR
- DHS signed agreement with ANSI-ASQ National
Accreditation Board (ANAB) to establish and
oversee the implementation and accreditation of
Title IX
9Recent Events (contd)
- August 2008 (contd)
- ASIS announces plans for a new US Business
Continuity and Risk standard - Solicits the support of ANSI organization
- ASIS is an ANSI accredited Standards Development
Organization (SDO) - DRII protests and rallies others to do the same
- Carnegie Mellon CERT Resiliency Framework Code
of Practice Standards Crosswalk (11 standards)
published - October 2008
- ANSI Homeland Security Standards Panel
discussion - Subject was Public law 110-53 Title XI voluntary
standards - DHS draft on criteria to be evaluated in
standards selection - ASIS hosted stakeholder deliberation meeting and
then re-affirms its direction in developing a new
ANSI standard
10Recent Events (contd)
- October 2008 (contd)
- Singapore (SPRING) launches new certifiable
standard SS540 which replaces TR 192004 - January 2009
- NFPA issues 2010 version of NFPA1600 for public
comment - ASIS International holds joint working group
meeting to outline new US standard based largely
on BS 25999 - 1st public feedback session on Title IX sponsored
by the DHS - The Business Continuity Institute (BCI) announced
the release of an updated version of its business
continuity Good Practice Guidelines -- designated
as GPG2008-2 - February 2009
- 2nd public feedback session on Title IX sponsored
by the DHS
Work Continues
11BS 25999 NFPA1600 Comparison
- NFPA1600
- 17 year history
- 2007 update/2010 draft
- ANSI Standard (US)
- Not Currently Certifiable
- Non ISO structure
- 16 Element Groupings
- 112 detail points
- Available for Free
- 4 pages
- BS 25999
- 7 year history (PAS 56)
- 2006-07 releases
- BSI Standard (UK)
- Certifiable
- Follows ISO structure
- 11 Element Groupings
- 156 detail points
- Available for Cost
- 12 pages (specification)
12Key Differences
- NFPA1600
- Component/Task Focus
- More Reactive in Nature
- Flow Applicable to Mitigation/Preparedness/Respons
e/Recovery - Strong on Emergency Planning Response
- BS 25999
- Process/System Focus
- More Proactive in Nature
- Flow Applicable to Plan-Do-Check-Act Model (ISO)
- Strong on Awareness Embed into the Culture
- Strong on Documentation, Records Accountability
13Core Elements of These and Other Standards
- A set of voluntary criteria
- Applicable to any size organization
- Provides for auditing and validation
- Are an alternative to regulations
- May become recognized as industry best practices
(are also driven from same) - A private sector vs. legislative process
- Source Sloan Report Framework for Voluntary
Preparedness - Published February 2008 compared 7
standards/best practices
14Common Elements Examined by These Standards
- Scope Policy
- Risk Identification
- Prevention Mitigation, Evaluation Planning
- Incident Management
- Recovery
- Awareness Training
- Exercise Testing
- Program Revision Improvement
Any of the existing standards, guidelines, best
practices, or regulatory approaches can be used
to meet the intent of the Title IX PL 110-53.
What is lacking is the know-how, implementation
tools and evaluation metrics to help the private
sector, particularly small and medium businesses,
successfully select and implement an approach.
Source Sloan Report Framework for Voluntary
Preparedness
15Why Perform a Program Assessment?
If we could first know where we are, and whither
we are tending, we could better judge what to
do, and how to do it. - Abraham Lincoln
- Simplify measuring and managing continuity
activities - Understand how key resiliency competencies map to
leading BC practice standards, i.e., NFPA1600, BS
25999, etc. - Improve compliance efficiency streamline and
simplify management reporting and/or regulatory
efforts - Provide an appraisal methodology to benchmark an
organizations resiliency and those of third
party suppliers. - Establish a sharable common measurement of risk
and resiliency - Establish a roadmap for implementing a mature
resiliency program
16How to Aggregate Report Results?
17BS 25999-2 Summary Perspective
18NFPA 1600 Summary Perspective
19Grouping of Examination Points
20Program Maturity
21Quadrant Placement
22 Thank You tmartin_at_eaglerockalliance.com 973-325
-9900