Title: SW 644: Issues in Developmental Disabilities Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification and
1SW 644 Issues in Developmental
DisabilitiesIntellectual Disability Definition,
Classification and Assessment
- Lecture Presenter
- Lara S. Head, Ph.D.
- Post Doctorate Fellow in Psychology
- Waisman Center
- University of Wisconsin-Madison
2Issue of Change Providing Context
- Terminology
- Shift from mental retardation to intellectual
disability - Definition
- Evolving
- Assessment
- Balance between intelligence and adaptive
behavior - Implications
- Increasing consistency
3Issue of Change - Terminology
- Historical conceptualizations
- Presence of individuals with intellectual
impairments in society has been well documented
over time (Example Roman and Greek Culture) - Early religious leaders were among first to
advocate for humane treatment - Changing perceptions
- John Locke
- Jean-Marc-Gaspard Itard
- Edouard Seguin
4Classification
- A classification system is introduced
- J. Langdon Hayden Down
- Classification by physical appearance
- Late 1800s Recognition of brain pathology in
intellectual disabilities - Education reform and Residential Schools
- Theodore Simon and Alfred Binet
- Early 1900s
- Classification based on IQ
5What is Intellectual Disability?
- Current Perspective
- A state of functioning rather than a
person-centered trait - Limitations in intellectual functioning
- Difficulties in meeting the ordinary challenges
associated with daily life - A social-ecological view
- Not an illness or a disease
- Medical model view
- Perception of sick
6What is Intellectual Disability?
- Types of causes
- Genetic
- Chromosomal
- Prenatal influences
- Perinatal influences
- Postnatal influences
- Diagnosis of intellectual disability is a process
- No single diagnostic test
- Defined by many organizations
7Terminology Differences
- Many different terms to describe intellectual
disability - Shift in terminology in last few years
- Mental Retardation / Intellectual Disability
- Significant limitations in intellectual
functioning and in adaptive behavior - Before 18
- Population of application remains the same
(www.aaidd.org)
8Terminology Differences
- Developmental Disability
- A severe, chronic disability that begins any time
from birth through age 21 and is expected to last
a lifetime. - May be cognitive, physical, or a combination of
both - Serious limitations in everyday activities
(www.nacdd.org) - Disability
- Personal limitations that represent a substantial
disadvantage with attempting to function in
society - Can originate at any age (www.aapd.org)
9Terminology Differences
- Benefits to terminology change
- Reflects the changed construct of disability
- Aligns better with current professional practices
- Provides a logical basis for individualized
supports provision - Less offensive to individuals with disability
- More consistent with international terminology
10Issue of Change- Definition
- Definition
- Evolving and dependent on assumptions that
clarify the context from which it is derived and
applied - Significant consequences
- Service eligibility
- Subject or not subject to certain practices
- Exempted or not exempted
- Included or not included
- Entitled or not entitled
11Development of Definition
- 1961 AAMR introduces term mental retardation
- 1973 Introduction of standard deviation to
describe intellectual disability as well as 18 as
upper age limit for initial manifestation of
intellectual disability - 1980s Specific IQ values with ranges
122002 AAIDD System
- Diagnosis
- Essential to establishing eligibility
- Classification
- A means of communication
- Planning Supports
- Enhancing personal outcomes
- Four different definitions for intellectual
disability focus on DSM IV and AAIDD
132002 AAIDD System
- Multidimensional Approach
- Other systems, like DSM IV, is multi-axial and
focuses on medical disorders and stressors - Important to assess current functioning and
strengths of individual
142002 AAIDD System
- Diagnosis
- Core definition (2002)
- Mental retardation is a disability characterized
by significant limitations in intellectual
functioning and in adaptive behavior - Is expressed in conceptual, social, and adaptive
skills - Originates before age 18
152002 AAIDD System
- 5 essential assumptions
- Limitations must be considered within context
- Diagnosis based on a valid assessment that
considers various factors - Recognizes that limitations and strengths coexist
- Limitations provide information to develop
support needs - With personalized supports provided over time,
life functioning will improve
162002 AAIDD System Intelligence
- General mental capacity includes
- Reasoning
- Problem-solving
- Abstract thinking
- Comprehension
- Learning from experience
- Limitations influence other aspects of
functioning - Best represented by intelligence test scores
using appropriate test instruments
172002 AAIDD System Adaptive Behavior
- Collection of skills that individuals learn to
use in order to function in everyday life - Conceptual Skills
- Receptive and expressive language
- Reading and writing
- Money concepts
- Self-directions
182002 AAIDD System Adaptive Behavior
- Social Skills
- Interpersonal skills
- Responsibility
- Self-esteem
- Practical Skills
- Eating
- Dressing/Bathing
- Mobility
- Daily Living tasks
192002 AAIDD System Classification
- Classification
- Dimension I
- Intellectual Abilities
- Dimension II
- Adaptive Behavior
- Dimension III
- Participation, Interactions, and Social Roles
- Dimension IV
- Health
- Dimension V
- Context
202002 AAIDD System Supports
- Planning Supports
- Human development
- Teaching and education
- Home living
- Community living
- Employment
- Health and safety
- Behavioral
- Social
- Protection and advocacy
21DSM IV TR Definition
- Significantly below average intellectual
functioning IQ of approximately 70 or below on
an individually administered IQ test - Accompanied by significant limitations in
adaptive functioning in at least 2 skill areas - Communication, self-care, home living,
social/interpersonal skills, use of community
resources, self-direction, functional academic
skills, work leisure, health, and safety
(American Psychiatric Association, 2000, p. 41) - Onset before age 18
22DSM IV-TR Levels of Mental Retardation
- Mild MR
- 55-70 IQ
- Adaptive limitations in 2 or more domains
- Moderate MR
- 35-54 IQ
- Adaptive limitations in 2 or more domains
- Severe MR
- 20-34 IQ
- Adaptive limitations in all domains
- Profound MR
- Below 20 IQ
- Adaptive limitations in all domains
23Who are the Intellectually Disabled?
- Prevalence
- Less than 1 of the overall population
- Estimated 3 of the population in the United
States - Residence
- WI
- Approximately 81 reside in a home/supported
living setting - Approximately 19 reside in a state
public/private facility (www.cu.edu/ColemanInstitu
te/stateofthestates/Wisconsin.html)
24Special Education Services Fall 2005
Site www.ideadata.org
25Special Education Services Fall 2005
Site www.ideadata.org
26Who are the Intellectually Disabled?
- Age differences
- Increased prevalence typically from preschool to
middle childhood years - Increased prevalence in teen years
- Decreased prevalence in older individuals
- Gender differences
- Increased reports in males
27Who are the Intellectually Disabled?
- Associated impairments
- 20-25 visually impaired
- 10 hearing impaired
- Seizure disorders occur in approximately 33 of
individuals in institutional settings - Cerebral palsy occurs 30-60 of individuals in
individuals with severe intellectual disability
28Who are the Intellectually Disabled?
- Psychiatric disorders
- Estimates of 4-18 of individuals with ID have a
co-occurring psychiatric disorder - 4.4 Schizophrenia
- 2.2 Depressive disorder
- 2.2 Generalized Anxiety Disorder
- 4.4 Phobic disorder
- Deb, Thomas, Bright 2001
29Profiles of Intellectual Disability
- Mild ID Profile
- Minor delays in the preschool period
- Evaluation often only after school entry
- 2-3 word sentences used in early primary grades
- Expressive language improvement with time
- Reading/math skills 1st to 6th grade levels
- Social interests typically age appropriate
- Mental age range of 8-11 years of age
- Persistent low academic skill attainment can
limit vocational possibilities
30Profiles of Intellectual Disability
- Moderate ID Profile
- More evident and consistent delays in milestones
- At school entry may communicate with single words
and gestures - Functional language is the goal
- School entry self-care skills 2-3 year range
- By age 14 basic self-care skills, simple
conversations, and cooperative social
interactions - Mental age of 6-8 years of age
- Vocational opportunities limited to unskilled
work with direct supervision and assistance
31Profiles of Intellectual Disability
- Severe ID Profile
- Identification in infancy to two years
- Often co-occurring with biological anomalies
- Increased risk for motor disorders and epilepsy
- By age 12 may use 2-3 word phrases
- Mental age typically 4-6 years of age
- As adults assistance typically required for even
self-care activities - Close supervision needed for all vocational tasks
32Profiles of Intellectual Disability
- Profound ID Profile
- Identification in infancy
- Marked delays and biological anomalies
- Preschool age range may function as a 1-year-old
- High rate of early mortality
- By age 10 some walk/acquire some self-care
skills with assistance - Gesture communication
- Recognizes some familiar people
- Mental age range from birth to 4 years of age
- Functional skill acquisition not likely
33Variations in ID Classification
- Childhood intervention history
- Educational experiences
- Socialization opportunities
- Adult habilitative and prevocational activities
- Presence of physical impairment
34Issue of Change - Assessment
- Assessment
- Establishing a balance between the importance of
IQ and identifying functional behaviors and
support needs - Increased recognition of the cultural
implications of intelligence testing
35Identifying Individuals with ID
- Assessment
- Cognitive/intellectual ability
- Adaptive behavior functioning
36Cognitive Ability Assessment
- Standardized and Norm-referenced Tests
- Standardized a test given in a certain,
prescribed way using the same set of directions
with every individual - Norm-referenced Examining an individuals test
performance in comparison to the average
performance or norm, of other individuals of
the same chronological age - Validity and Reliability
- Validity Does the test measure what we want?
- Reliability Does the test measure consistently?
37Cognitive Ability Assessment
- Normal Curve / Distribution
- Represents the distribution of abilities in the
general population - Demonstrates the extent to which individuals
deviate from the mean based on a normal
distribution of scores - Average IQ 100
- Range 85-115 approximately 68
- Fewer people are represented at the extreme ends
of the curve - IQ lt 70 approximately 3
38Cognitive Ability Assessment
39Cognitive Ability Assessment
- Types of Intelligence
- Verbal Ability
- Nonverbal Ability
- Other theoretical models
40Cognitive Ability Assessment
- Common Measures
- WISC Series (WISC IV WAIS II WPPSI, etc.)
- Stanford-Binet V
- Woodcock-Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities
- Bayley Scales of Infant Development
- Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children
41Cognitive Ability Assessment
- Stability over time
- For most, intelligence remains stable after 5
years of age (Zigler, Balla, Hodapp, 1984) - However, variability in individual growth
patterns warrant periodic evaluation
42Other Consideration in Cognitive Ability
Assessment
- How reliable and valid was the test
- Other Important Features culture, language
barriers, physical impairments - Ability to accurately compare individuals
performance against a normative group when
presence of some physical issues - Need to be vigilant with these issues when
conducting testing, review the literature and
talking to individuals and their families - Also consider if there was a great deal of
scatter within the individuals performance?  - Intellectual disability is a feature of many
different conditions, many different disorders - The diagnosis of intellectual disability should
always be made whenever the diagnostic criteria
are met regardless of whether or not there are
other conditions that are present - Individuals with intellectual disability are
vulnerable to lots of other conditions simply by
the nature of how they do function and the nature
by which their ability to execute their skills
effectively can be compromised
43Adaptive Behavior Assessment
- The adaptive behavior approach was originally
intended to encourage one to look at the
individuals with an eye toward remediation and
prescriptive assessment, rather than merely
labeling and classifying. (Nihira, 1999, p. 8)
44Adaptive Behavior Assessment
- Adaptive behavior can be difficult to assess
- Adaptive behavior is not independent of
intelligence - Behaviors accepted as adaptive at one age may not
be acceptable at another age - What constitutes adaptive behavior is variable
45Adaptive Behavior Assessment
- Adaptive Behavior
- Conceptual Skills
- communication, functional academics,
self-direction, money concepts - Social Skills
- interpersonal skills, self-esteem,
naiveté/gullibility, self-governance (obeys
rules) - Practical Skills
- self-care, domestic skills, work, health safety
46Adaptive Behavior Assessment
- Relationship between IQ and adaptive behavior
functioning - r .30 -.50 (Harrison Oakland, 2003)
- Highest correlation in the lower IQ ranges
- More variability in adaptive behavior scores in
higher IQ ranges - Adaptive behavior and intelligence work together
47Adaptive Behavior Assessment
- Current standards of practice
- Assess present functioning
- Assess typical functioning
- Consider the persons age and culture
- Assessment using standardized measure of AB
normed on general population - Compare persons adaptive behavior to community
standards and expectations - Use multiple informants
- Retrospective assessment (Schalock et al., 2007)
48Adaptive Behavior Assessment
- Measures
- Vineland II Adaptive Behavior Scales
- (Sparrow, Cicchetti, Balla, 2005)
- Birth to age 90
- Three versions
- Four Domains Communication, Daily Living
Skills, Socialization, Motor Skills - Maladaptive Behavior Domain
- Adaptive behavior composite score
- Survey scale norms based on 3,000 people
49Adaptive Behavior Assessment
- Measures
- AAMR Adaptive Behavior Scales (ABS)
- School/Community (Lambert, Nihira, Leland,
1993) - Residential/Community (Nihira, Leland, Lambert,
1993) - Scales of Independent Behavior Revised (SIB-R)
- (Brunininks, Woodcock, Weatherman, Hill, 1996)
- Adaptive Behavior Assessment System 2nd Edition
(ABAS II) (Harrison Oakland, 2003)
50Why Change? - Implications
- Professional-Parent Communication
- Maximize the role of professional in shaping
parent perceptions - Recognize the adaptation process as an evolving
experience for parents - Need to listen to and value the perspectives of
parents - Consider the unique needs of all family members
- Need to be sensitive about dreams and hopes of
parents for their children - Need to respect familys coping style
51Why Change?
- Service Provision
- Effective resource utilization
- Lifetime expenditure -- 51.2 billion for
- individuals with ID (www.cdc.org)
- Increased emphasis on adaptive behavior
functioning and habilitation services - Utilizing support needs assessment as a tool
towards improved interventions
52Why Change?
- Legal Implications
- Identifying individuals at risk as vulnerable
adults - Individuals within the criminal justice system
- As victims 4 to 10 times increased risk
(Sobsey, 1994) - As suspects/offenders 4-10 of the prison
population (Sullivan Knutson, 2000)
53Future Directions
- Research / discussion will continue
- Refining the construct of intellectual disability
- Understanding the influence of terminology
- Expanding our understanding of the nature of
intelligence, adaptive behavior and functional
differences - Improving reliability of diagnosis
- Improving knowledge of human functioning
- Examining the relationships among groups
- Determining support provision
- Recognizing the role of advocacy
54Resources - Websites
- www.aaidd.org American Association on
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
(formerly AAMR) - www.nacdd.org National Association of Councils
on Developmental Disabilities - www.familyvillage.wisc.edu Family Village
(University of Wisconsin-Madison) - www.fragilex.org National Fragile X Foundation
- www.cureautismnow.org Cure Autism Now
55Resources - Websites
- www.autism-society.org Autism Society of
America - www.ndss.org National Down Syndrome Society
- www.mpssociety.org/content/4163/Tributes/ --
National MPS Society (Hunter syndrome) - www.ideadata.org Special Education Population
Figures Federal/State - www.cu.edu/ColemanInstitute/stateofthestates --
Disability Population Figures State - www.aapd.org American Association of People
with Disabilities
56Resources Video/Images
- www.fragilex.org/photogallery/photogallery.htm --
Fragile X photographs - www.taaproject.com/media/the-taap-video/ --
Autism Acceptance Project - www.taaproject.com/media/video-vault/the-reason-th
e-joy-of-adam/ - www.cdlsusa.org/familyalbum/index.html --
Cornelia de Lange Syndrome Images CDLS
Foundation
57Resources Video/Images
- www.cdlsusa.org/video/index.shtml -- CDLS Video
- www.ucp.org/ucp_generalsub.cfm/1/9/12171 --
United Cerebral Palsy One Life - www.lndinfo.org/LNDPatients/Equipment.html --
Lesch-Nyhan Disease Registry Images - www.rettsyndrome.org/content.asp?contentid444
International Rett Syndrome Association - www.youtube.com/watch?v_TbWcdN-W8o Living a
Life of Disability video
58Resources Further Reading
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000).
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental
disorders (4th ed., Text rev.). Washington, DC
Author. - Deb, S., Thomas, M., Bright, C. (2001). Mental
disorder in adults with intellectual disability
Prevalence of functional psychiatric illness
among a community-based population aged between
16 and 64 years. Journal of Intellectual
Disability Research, 45 (6), 495-505. - Elks, M. A. (2005). Visual Indictment A
contextual analysis of The Kallikak Family
photographs. Mental Retardation, 43 (4),
268-280. - Luckasson, R., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Buntinx, W.
H. E., Coulter, D. L., Snell, M. E., Spitalnik,
D. M. Spreat, S., Tasse, M. J. (2002). Mental
Retardation Definition, classification, and
systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC
American Association on Mental Retardation.
59Resources Further Reading
- Snell, M. E. Vorrhees, M. D. (2006). On being
labeled with mental retardation. In H. N.
Switzky S. Greenspan (Eds.), What is mental
retardation Ideas for an evolving disability
(pp. 61-80). Washington, DC American
Association on Mental Retardation. - Sattler, J. Hoge, R. D. (2006). Assessment of
children Behavioral, social, and clinical
foundations (5th ed.). Jerome M. Sattler,
Publisher, Inc. San Diego, CA. - Schalock, R.L., Buntinx, W., Borthwick-Duffy, A.,
Luckasson, R., Snell, M., Tasse, M., Wehmeyer,
M. (2007). Users Guide Mental retardation
Definition, classification, and systems of
supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC American
Association on Intellectual and Developmental
Disabilities.
60Resources Further Reading
- Schalock, R. L. et al. (2007). The renaming of
mental retardation Understanding the change to
the term intellectual disability. Intellectual
and Developmental Disabilities, 45 (2), 116-124. - Sullivan, P. Knutson, J. (2000). Maltreatment
and disabilities A population-based
epidemiological study. Child Abuse Neglect, 24
(10), 1257-1273. - Turnbull, R., Turnbull, A., Warren, S., Eidelman,
S. Marchand, P. (2002). Shakespeare redux, or
Romeo and Juliet revisited Embedding a
terminology and name change in a new agenda for
the field of mental retardation. Mental
Retardation, 40 (1), 65-70. - Zigler, E., Balla, D., Hodapp, R. (1994). On
the definition and classification of mental
retardation. American Journal of Mental
Deficiency, 89 (3), 215-230.