Title: Applying the DCF
1Applying the DCF
- Stephen G. Hill, C.R.R.A.
- Principal, Hill Associates
- Society of Utility and Regulatory Financial
Analysts - 38th Annual Financial Forum
- April 27-28, 2006
2Applying the DCF
- DCF Milestones
- Sample Group Selection
- Dividend Yield Calculation
- Growth Rate Estimate
- Are Flotation Costs Necessary?
- Does the DCF Have Problems When Market Prices
are Different From Book?
3Applying the DCF
DCF MILESTONES
- Pre-history Discounting Cash Flows/Compound
Interest/Bond Valuation - 1938 Williams, J. B., The Theory of Investment
Value, North-Holland Publishing Company,
Amsterdam. - 1956 Gordon, M., Shapiro, E., Capital Equipment
Analysis The Required Rate of Profit,
Management Science, (October), pp. 102-110. - 1962 Gordon, M., The Investment, Financing and
Valuation of the Corporation, Richard Irwin,
Inc., Homewood, IL. - 1966 DCF first presented by Gordon at F.C.C. in
ATT rate proceeding. - 1974 Gordon, M., The Cost of Capital to a Public
Utility, MSU Public Utility Studies, East
Lansing, MI. brsvlong-term sustainable growth - 1985-1990 F.E.R.C. Generic ROE Rulemaking
Proceedings, selects DCF as primary indicator of
equity capital costs k d(10.5g)/P g - 1984 Morin, R., Utilities Cost of Capital,
Public Utilities Reports, Arlington, VA M/Blt1.0,
no problems with DCF - 1994 Morin, R., Regulatory Finance, Utilities
Cost of Capital, Public Utilities Reports,
Arlington, VA M/Bgt1.0, problems with DCF
4Applying the DCF
SAMPLE GROUP
- Select a sample group of utilities with similar
characteristics. (more is better) - A DCF analysis of only one company does not
provide a reliable estimate of the cost of
equity. - A DCF analysis of a large group of companies that
have different risk profiles will also not
provide a reliable estimate of the cost of
equity. - Important characteristics percent of regulated
operations, bond ratings, fuel mix (electrics),
stable operations, no dividend cuts.
5(No Transcript)
6Applying the DCF
- DIVIDEND YIELD CALCULATION
- D1 Next Period Dividend.
- Dividends paid quarterly, so relevant period is
next quarter. (Gordon, 1974, p. 81) - If dividends have been traditionally increased in
next quarter, then D1 d0(1g) x 4 if not,
then, D1 d0 x 4. - FERC ROE hearings, Generic adjustment
d0(11/2g), quarterly compounding unnecessary. - Stock price most recent 30-day closing average.
- Check dividend yield result with Value Line
year-ahead dividend yield projections. (Selection
Index)
7Applying the DCF
- GROWTH RATE ESTIMATION
- Use Sustainable Growth (b x r) as a basis.
- Review b x r growth rate trends, past 5 years
and projected 3-to-5 years. Check for growth rate
anomalies, look behind numbers. - Study both 5-year historical and projected growth
in earnings (many sources), dividends and book
value (Value Line). - Use centrality of data and judgment to arrive at
a reasonable expectation for sustainable (b x r)
growth based on available evidence. - Estimate investor-expected growth in number of
shares outstanding (s). - v 1 - M/B. (fraction of new issue that
increases expected growth) - Compare combined (brsv) growth rate estimate to
published data.
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10Applying the DCF
- Flotation Costs
- Vast majority of flotation costs contained in
underwriters expenses, which are not out of
pocket expenses for the utility. - Primary market investor (brokerage firms), savvy
and aware of fact that certain portion of
proceeds do not go to company. - Stock issuances with MgtgtB, increase equity
values. - Similarity to bond issuance expenses - when bond
price is above face value, then cost adjustment
is negative not positive. - Secondary market transaction costs offset
flotation costs. - Explicit flotation cost adjustment is unnecessary.
11Applying the DCF
- DCF Problems Arising in the 1990s
- DCF understates cost of equity when market price
are above book value. - DCF should be adjusted upward to account for
financial risk differences that exist between
market value capital structure and book value
capital structure. - These two are really the same argument.
12Applying the DCF
CLAIM DCF DEFFICIENT WHEN MARKET PRICE ? BOOK
VALUE
Situation 1 Situation 2 Situation 3
1 Initial Purchase Price 25.00 50.00 100.00
2 Initial Book Value 50.00 50.00 50.00
3 Initial M/B 0.50 1.00 2.00
4 DCF Return 1055 10.00 10.00 10.00
5 Dollar Return 5.00 5.00 5.00
6 Dollar Dividends 5 Yld 1.25 2.50 5.00
7 Dollar Growth 5 Gro 3.75 2.50 0.00
8 Market Return 20.00 10.00 5.00
SOURCE Morin 1994, p. 237
13(No Transcript)
14Applying the DCF
CLAIM WHEN M?B, LEVERAGE ADJUSTMENT NECESSARY
- There is no support in the financial literature
for the comparison of market-value and book-value
capital structures. (MM, Gordon) - One firm cannot have two levels of financial
risk. - True financial risk resides in the income
statement, and is a function of the actual amount
of interest expense a firm pays and its income
volatility. - Market-value and book-value capital structures
are two different ways to measure financial
riskmeaningful only when compared to other
capital structures measured in the same way
M-to-M or B-to-B - 1 foot 12 inches 30.48 cm. Different
numbers/same length. - MgtgtB indicates utility is expected to earn a
return that exceeds its cost of capital (Gordon).
Leverage adjustment increases as M/B
increases-circularity problem. - Utility rates set on book value capital structure
near-universal practice, investors aware of that
long-term practice (efficient markets). - Utility industry has been able to raise adequate
capital with rates set on book-value capital
structures, no leverage adjustment necessary.
15(No Transcript)
16Applying the DCF
- DCF is a simple algebraic approximation of a
complex real-world phenomenon (investor
expectations). Use other models for support. - DCF provides the most reliable estimate of the
cost of equity capital, has earned near-universal
acceptance because of that fact. - DCF provides reliable estimates of the cost of
equity regardless of the market-to-book ratio.
17Applying the DCF
- Stephen G. Hill, C.R.R.A.
- Principal, Hill Associates
- Society of Utility and Regulatory Financial
Analysts - 38th Annual Financial Forum
- April 27-28, 2006