Wright State University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Wright State University

Description:

Powers the closing action. Will weigh less then 1.5 pounds. open/close control ... Pick-up a wide variety of sizes 7.5cm-.5cm. Middle finger has lip for round objects ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:368
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: johnw129
Category:
Tags: close | cork | flooring | inches | mm | open | state | to | university | up | wide | wright

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Wright State University


1
Wright State University
  • Jenny Broering
  • Mike Hill
  • Rahul Shah
  • Michael Wasco

2
Problem Statement
  • The purpose of this project is to design and
    manufacture robotic manipulator to assist younger
    patients with daily activities, such as
    retrieving things from the ground or immediate
    environment.
  • Basic Requirements
  • 0.75 m reach from front of wheelchair
  • Each linkage must move no more than 0.25 m/s
  • Lift 0.5 kg mass (1.1 lbs.) with 7.5 cm in
    diameter
  • Maximum cost of 4,500 (excluding controllers)

3
Agenda
  • Design Constraints
  • Robotic Arm Design (detailed)
  • Conclusions
  • Questions

4
Design Constraints
  • Arm, including motors, must weight less than 30
    lbs.
  • Keeps wheelchair balanced
  • Dimensions of arm/base must not exceed 6 inches
  • Wheelchair must be able to fit through standard
    doorways

5
Design Constraints
  • Keep shoulder and elbow motors at the base
  • reduces weight on arm itself
  • transmit power to elbow via shaft
  • Aluminum 2024
  • High Strength-to-Weight ratio
  • Lightweight compared to steels (2770 vs. 8030
    kg/m3)

6
WSU Arm Design
7
Orientation of Base Motors
  • Mounting position
  • Length along chair allows space for base plate
  • Straight layout allows for easy mounting
    possibilities
  • Two large motors displaced from arm
  • Reduces torque
  • Makes links slimmer and lighter

8
Base Configuration
9
Shoulder Motor
  • Required Torque 465 in-lbs (7433 oz-in)
  • Speed Requirement 2.65 RPM
  • Suggested motor and gearhead
  • K D Magmotor servo motor
    (model C33-I-200E08)
  • Carson 34EP100 NEMA 34 gearhead (1001)
  • 477 in-lbs provided

10
Shoulder Motor
  • Servo amplifier suggested to slow speed down to
    required speeds
  • connecting directly to 24 VDC will give an output
    of 10 RPM
  • connecting 24 VDC to a servo amplifier, we can
    set a speed from 0-10 RPM

11
Shoulder Motor Dimensions and Costs
  • Motor
  • 5.15 length
  • 3.38 diameter
  • apr. 5 lbs.
  • 134.00
  • Gearhead
  • 5.43 length
  • 3.25 diameter
  • 9.68 lbs
  • 700.00
  • Amplifier
  • 439.00

12
Elbow Motor
  • Required Torque 237 in-lbs (3797 oz-in)
  • Speed Requirement 4.4 RPM
  • Suggested motor and gearhead is the same as
    shoulder motor
  • K D Magmotor (model C33-I-200E08)
  • Carson 34EP100 NEMA 34 gearhead (1001)
  • 477 in-lbs provided

13
Elbow Motor Dimensions and Costs
  • Motor
  • 5.15 length
  • 3.38 diameter
  • apr. 5 lbs.
  • 134.00
  • Gearhead
  • 5.43 length
  • 3.25 diameter
  • 9.68 lbs
  • 700.00
  • Same as Shoulder motor choices
  • Amplifier
  • 439.00

14
Upper Arm
  • Comprises of two links
  • Dimensions 410 x 50 x 5 mm.
  • Weight 0.8772 lbs.
  • Advantages
  • slots cut to reduce the weight
  • Provide support for the shaft and the lower arm
  • encompasses the parts

15
Upper Arm
16
Bearing Plate
  • Provides structural support
  • Slot provided for compact closing of the arm
  • Dimensions 100 x 50 x 10 mm.
  • Weight 0.23 lbs.

17
Elbow Joint
  • Elbow motion using the shaft, bevel gears and
    rod.
  • Weight
  • Rod 0.045 lbs.
  • Shaft 0.614 lbs.
  • Bevel Gears 0.0278 lbs. each

18
Elbow Joint
  • Advantages
  • eliminates the motor-on-joint assembly.
  • reduces torque on the shoulder motor.

19
Lower Arm
  • Single shaft design
  • Two slots
  • decrease weight
  • Symmetric placement between the two upper arm
    links reduced unwanted torsion.

20
Lower Arm
  • Dimensions 320 x 50 x 5 mm.
  • Weight 0.3498 lbs.

21
Differential Assembly(wrist)
  • Motor-on-Gear Design
  • Off the Shelf vs. Machined
  • Dimensions

22
Design
  • Two Axes Movement
  • Gears spin in same direction, gripper pitches
    up/down
  • Gears spin in opposite directions, gripper rolls
    cw/ccw
  • Motor-on-Gear Design
  • Gear is attached to motor shaft
  • Motor shaft/gear have same axis of rotation

23
Off-the-Shelf vs. Machined
  • Currently searching for off-the-shelf models that
    can be incorporated into the design space
  • Machined differential will drive the cost up
    significantly

24
Dimensions
  • Approx. Size (w/o motors) 162x120x50 mm
  • Weight (w/o motors) 1.7 lbs

25
Differential Assembly(wrist)
26
Differential Motors
  • Orientation of motors provide a direct
    application of the gear movement
  • Differential design allows motors to work
    together thus reducing the size and cost of motors

27
Differential Motors
  • Torque requirement 107.2 oz-in
  • Speed Requirement 15.7 RPM
  • Suggested motor
  • Barber-Colman permanent magnet DC Motor with
    gearhead (model EYQF-33300-661)
  • 12 VDC
  • 160 ozin
  • 9 RPM

28
Differential Motor Dimensions and Costs
  • Motor
  • 2.5 length
  • 1.5 diameter
  • weighs 9 oz.
  • 74.00 ea.

29
End Effecter(Gripper)
  • Motor-screw powered movement
  • Three Fingers
  • Dimensions

30
Gripper
31
Motor-Screw
  • Powers the closing action
  • Will weigh less then 1.5 pounds
  • open/close control
  • variable closing pressure

32
Three Fingers
  • Better stability
  • Pick-up a wide variety of sizes 7.5cm-.5cm
  • Middle finger has lip for round objects
  • Fork lift design
  • Non-slip cork/rubber padding

33
Dimensions
  • Each finger is 95 x 25 x 2 mm
  • Weighs only .333 kg w/o motor-screw
  • Hollow casing 50 x 95 mm
  • 2 mm wall thickness

34
Torque Calculations
  • Note that the weight of the materials were taken
    to act at the farthest distance possible

35
Motor Speed Calculations
? L/V
0.1524 m
0.542 m
0.902 m
36
Summary
  • Main motors placed at base
  • Design uses 5 motors
  • Design gives 5 axes of motion.
  • Upper arm is slightly longer than lower arm
  • Differential Design
  • Three finger Gripper

37
Summary
  • Motor cost 2768.00
  • Material cost 150.00 (est.)
  • Machining cost
  • Total weight. 36 lbs

38
Disadvantages
  • Improper folding of arm
  • not certain if folding is within 6 in.
  • motor placement on differential makes wrist bulky
  • Overall assembly is overweight by 6 lbs.

39
Advantages
  • Meets nearly all of the constraints /
    requirements.
  • Shaft
  • allows transfer of more power to the lower arm
  • allows reduction of torque on the shoulder motor.
  • Use of plates instead of tube reduces overall
    weight considerably

40
Advantages
  • Can lift objects from the floor or from
    table-tops.
  • Torque requirements met by motors.
  • Versatile gripper.
  • Use of Aluminum 2024 in most parts
  • consistency in material
  • high strength to weight ratio (used in airframes)

41
?? Questions ??
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com