Results from D - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Results from D

Description:

LQ: Fractionally charged particles; carry both color & lepton numbers ... mSUGRA prediction within reach by end of year (with additional channels and for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: christosle
Learn more at: https://www-d0.fnal.gov
Category:
Tags: by | color | number | results

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Results from D


1
Results from DØ
Christos Leonidopoulos Columbia University
1.96 TeV 396 ns
  • QCD
  • New Phenomena
  • B Physics

Users Meeting Fermilab - June 2, 2004
for the DØ Collaboration
2
Operations Overview
  • DØ operating well and recording
  • physics quality data with
  • high (gt 90) efficiency
  • Data reconstructed on the Fermilab
  • farm within days
  • gt 350 pb-1 of data on tape.
  • 150-250 pb-1 used in todays results
  • Compare with 110 pb-1 in Run-I

We have entered a new era in hadron collider
physics!
3
  • Elastic scattering
  • Inclusive jet pT cross section
  • Di-jet mass cross section
  • Studies on ?f between jets
  • QCD
  • New Phenomena
  • B Physics
  • Verify accuracy of parton-level NLO calculations
  • Search for compositeness of elementary particles
  • Look for new physics

4
dN/dt spectrum (elastic )
  • DØ points normalized to E710 data
  • First measurement
  • performed in this t region energy!
  • Using standalone data from
  • Forward Proton Detector
  • (Roman pots at z 23, 33, 57, 59m
  • cover 2.5 lt ? lt 6 region)

Block et al.
t momentum transfer
5
Inclusive jet pT cross section
statistical errors only
Are quarks composite? Look for excess at high pT!
  • Agreement with theory within systematic
  • uncertainties (mainly jet-energy
  • scale correction)
  • Systematic errors reduced by end
  • of summer
  • First measurements for large rapidity region!
  • Aim constrain gluon at high x (poorly known)
  • Good agreement between data NLO

6
Di-jet mass cross section
statistical errors only
Look for bumps (new particles) at di-jet
spectrum
  • Agreement with theory within (large)
  • systematic uncertainties (mainly jet-energy
  • scale correction)
  • Systematic errors reduced by end of summer
  • Measurements in central region (yjetlt0.5)
  • Good agreement between data NLO pQCD

7
Highest di-jet mass event
r-z view
x-y view
  • Jet 1 pT 616 GeV/c, y -0.19, f 0.65 rad
  • Jet 2 pT 557 GeV/c, y 0.25, f 3.78 rad
  • MJJ 1206 GeV/c2

Enough energy to create 1200 hydrogen atoms!
8
Studies on ?f between jets
pQCD, leading order jets produced back-to-back
Higher order effects additional jets
(radiation)
  • Good agreement between
  • data NLO QCD for
  • medium ?f values
  • Disagreement for
  • low (hard radiation) and
  • large ?f (soft radation)
  • Agreement with parton
  • shower MC generators
  • (PYTHIA and HERWIG)

9
  • Search for extra dimensions
  • in ee/?? and mono-jet channels
  • Search for 1st generation Leptoquarks
  • Search for squarks/gluinos
  • Search for trileptons
  • Search for GMSB SUSY
  • QCD
  • New Phenomena
  • B Physics
  • The Tevatron is the highest-energy accelerator in
    the world!
  • Look for signs of SUSY at the TeV scale
  • Discover new particles
  • Constrain (or rule out!) theoretical models for
    Physics beyond SM

10
The Search for Extra Dimensions
  • Hierarchy problem why is gravity so weak?
  • Electroweak scale
  • Gravity scale
  • String theory solution extra dimensions
  • SM forces live in usual 3 spatial dimensions
  • Gravity leaks into extra dimensions 3 ?3n
  • True gravity
  • Signs to look for
  • Excess in di-lepton di-photon channels (via
    virtual gravitons)
  • Or mono-jet missing ET (real graviton escapes
    into extra dimensions!)

11
Highest mass Drell-Yan event
r-z view
x-y view
12
Large Extra Dimensions
Scattering angle at rest frame
Invariant mass
DØ Run II Preliminary
QCD
ED signal for ?G0.6
instrumental background ()
DØ Run II Preliminary
Distributions for ee-, ?? (200 pb-1)
  • Background Drell-Yan direct ?? production
  • (normalized to low end of invariant mass
    spectrum)
  • () Instrumental background jets
    misidentified as electrons or photons
  • Determine extra-dimension contribution from fits
    to spectra

13
Large Extra Dimensions results
Measure ?G extract lower limit on MS (for
different F models)
  • GRW F1
  • HLZ Flog(Ms2/M2), n2
  • F2/(n-2), ngt2
  • Hewett F2?/p, ?1

200 pb-1
Worlds best sensitivity!
Mono-jet analysis currently limited by systematic
uncertainties
14
The Search for Leptoquarks
  • Unification of lepton-quark sectors at
    high-energy scales
  • LQ Fractionally charged particles carry both
    color lepton numbers
  • Common element in many Grand-Unified models
  • 1st generation LQ coupling to e (?) and u, d
    quarks
  • Experimental signature look for final states
    with two jets ee (or e?)

15
The Search for Leptoquarks
ee- mode ST distribution (175 pb-1)
e? mode ST distribution (175 pb-1)
DØ Run II Preliminary
DØ Run II Preliminary
Main background
  • W jets
  • QCD (w/ fake e or ? )
  • top-quark pair
  • Drell-Yan or Z jets
  • QCD (w/ fake ee- )
  • top-quark pair

16
Search for Leptoquarks results
DØ Run II Preliminary
175 pb-1
  • Combine two channels, extend reach
  • Very competitive limit on leptoquark mass
  • MLQ gt 238 GeV/c2 , if BR(LQ ? eq)100
  • Analysis on 2nd generation LQ search in progress

17
Search for squarks and gluinos
  • Squarks gluinos supersymmetric partners of
    quarks gluons
  • If squarks are lighter than gluinos
  • If gluinos are lighter than squarks
  • Results here are interpreted in the minimal
    supersymmetric gravity (mSUGRA)
  • framework (simplest robust SUSY model)
  • High cross-section about 800 squarks/gluinos
    produced for 200 pb-1

(Stable) Lightest Supersymmetric Particle (LSP)
A great candidate for explaining the
(unaccounted) dark matter
18
SUSY candidate
3d view
x-y view
  • Jet 1 pT 289 GeV/c
  • Jet 2 pT 117 GeV/c
  • ET 385 GeV/c2

19
Squarks and gluinos results
  • 4 events observed
  • 2.7 SM events expected (Z/W production)

85 pb-1 (dedicated trigger run from Apr-Sep
2003)
Exciting event!
20
More SUSY searches trileptons
  • Chargino-neutralino production
  • Experimental signature lllmissing ET one
    of the cleanest for SUSY

DØ Run II Preliminary
  • Have to battle many sources
  • of background
  • After final cuts

175 pb-1
Expected signal distribution
21
Trilepton searches results
  • Combination of trilepton searches
  • Significant improvement over Run-I cross section
    limit
  • mSUGRA prediction within reach by end of year
    (with additional channels and for the best
    scenario)

175 pb-1
22
Even more SUSY GMSB
  • Gauge Mediated Symmetry Breaking (GMSB) at scale
    ?
  • Light Gravitino ( ltlt eV) is LSP, NLSP can be
    neutralino or slepton
  • If NLSP is neutralino

All standard SUSY signatures complemented by two
photons
  • 1 events observed
  • 2.5 SM events expected

185 pb-1
Improves LEP limit for this model
23
  • Confirmation of X(3872) state
  • Search for Bs ? µµ- rare decay
  • Precise t(B)/t(B0) measurement
  • Bd mixing measurements
  • Prospects for Bs mixing
  • QCD
  • New Phenomena
  • B Physics
  • Look for rare/exotic decays
  • Challenge SM with precision b-quark measurements
    unique at Tevatron
  • Discover new particles

24
Observation of new particle X(3872)
  • New particle X(3872) observed
  • by Belle() last summer in the decay
  • mode
  • where
  • DØ observed X(3872) using

() Confirmed by CDF
225 pb-1
Forward angles not accessible by CDF
X(3872) has similar behavior to that of the
charmonium state ?(2S)
25
Rare decays BS ? µµ-
  • SM forbidden at tree level
  • But significantly enhanced in some extensions
    to SM
  • Two Higgs Doublet Model
  • Minimal Supersymmetric SM

Buras, Phys. Lett. B566 (2003) 115
26
Rare decays BS ? µµ-
BS mass distribution
Blind analysis signal box will open at end of
2004 (expected bgd 2.91.7 evts)
Normalized to
Assuming no signal events
à la Feldman Cousins
(statistical systematic uncertainties included)
Working on improving acceptance, suppressing
background
27
Exclusive Bd , Bs , ?b decays
World record!
28
B semileptonic mass peaks
D0 mass distribution (250 pb-1)
  • No particle-id on p, ?
  • Loose id on muon

Mostly B
of D0µ events 110k (250 pb-1)
Correct µ-p charge correlation
M(D)-M(D0) mass difference (250 pb-1)
Mostly Bd (correct µ-p charge correlation)
of Dµ events gt 25k (250 pb-1) (or gt100
semil. B events/pb-1)
  • Very good tracking muon
  • coverage (?lt2)
  • Robust muon trigger
  • Very large statistics

Wrong µ-p charge correlation
29
B Lifetimes t(B)/t(B0)
  • Analysis exploits large statistics in
  • B semileptonic channel
  • Novel technique measure directly
  • lifetime ratio in different time bins
  • (extract event yields from D0 mass
  • spectrum for both B , B0 samples)
  • many systematic errors cancel out
  • Eff(soft p) flat pT(D0)gt5 GeV/c

B0/B ratio of decay length distributions
Quenched lattice (NLO) QCD
Nierste, hep-ph/0209008
30
More B semileptonic decays
Combine D candidate with p
of Dµ events 523 40 (250 pb-1)
  • Clear contribution from two states
  • Interference between D10, D20 ?

Wrong µ-p charge correlation
LEP (PDG 2002)
First time measurement!
31
Bs mixing why do we care?
We think we understand the mixing of Bs. A
deviation from this simple diagram is a
deviation from SM.
Measure!
Consistent with CKM?
Lattice QCD
A Bs mixing measurement will be precise!
Before Bs mixing comes Bd mixing
32
Bd oscillations
Oscillations with soft-muon tagging ?md
0.506?0.055(stat)?0.049(syst) ps-1 Efficiency e
(4.8 0.2) Dilution D (46.0 4.2)
DØ Run II Preliminary
soft-muon
250 pb-1
First Bd oscillations seen at DØ!
In the works Additional measurements with two
more taggers!
jet-charge
soft-pion (same-side)
33
Bs semileptonic decays
Ds mass distributions
Correlations mostly due to Bs
Wrong µ-p charge correlation
single-µ 200 pb-1
single-µ 34 pb-1
of DSµ events 4458 342 (200 pb-1) (or 22
BS events/pb-1)
of DSµ events 796 256 (34 pb-1) (or 23
BS events/pb-1)
  • Large event yields!
  • Pushing for limit on Bs
  • oscillations by end of summer

34
Summary
  • Latest Run-II results from DØ presented
  • Analyses twice the statistics of Run-I
  • QCD
  • Studying the proton structure
  • New Phenomena
  • Exploring new territory
  • Going after spacetime dark matter mystery
  • B Physics
  • Already producing world-class measurements
  • Gearing up for Bs mixing
  • Lots of Physics ahead Stay tuned!

Today at 16.00 Arnulf Quadt on Top, E/W
Higgs results from DØ
35
Backup slides
36
Jet Energy Scale correction
Methodology for correcting the jet energy
  • E0 (offset) electronic noise, uranium noise,
  • underlying event
  • Use zero bias minimum bias events (data)
  • Scone out of code showering
  • Measure energy density in ring around
  • the jet axis (data)
  • Rjet (response) ratio of measured
  • to deposited energy
  • Determine imbalance in energy in
  • ? jet events (data)

37
Leptoquarks selection cuts
two jets e?
two jets ee
  • Electron ET gt 35 GeV/c2
  • Jets ET gt 25 GeV/c2 , ? lt 2.5
  • ET gt 30 GeV/c2
  • ?T (e?) gt 130 GeV/c2
  • ST gt 330 GeV/c2
  • Signal efficiency 13-25
  • Electrons ET gt 25 GeV/c2
  • Jets ET gt 20 GeV/c2 , ? lt 2.4
  • ? veto
  • ST gt 450 GeV/c2
  • Signal efficiency 12-33

38
Trilepton searches selection cuts
  • 2 electrons
  • E/M cluster matched to track
  • PT gt 12 (8) GeV/c
  • ? lt 1.1 (3.0)
  • Z suppressant
  • 15 lt Mee lt 60 GeV/c2
  • ?fee lt 2.8 rad
  • W (e?) ? suppressant silicon hit requirement
    or better e quality
  • top suppressant
  • Jet transverse energy ET gt 80 GeV/c2
  • Drell-Yan suppressant
  • ET gt 20 GeV/c2
  • ?f(e, ET ) gt 0.4 rad
  • 3rd electron
  • isolated track
  • PT gt 3 GeV/c

39
Squarks and gluinos selection cuts
  • Jets
  • ET gt 60 (50) GeV/c2
  • E/M fraction lt 0.95
  • ET gt 175 GeV/c2
  • 30 lt ?f(jet, ET) lt 165
  • Sjets(pT) gt 275 GeV/c

40
Comparing X(3872) to ?(2S)
  • Isolation
  • Decay length
  • Central vs. forward production
  • Helicity (angles at pp/µµ rest frame)
  • Transverse momentum

Examine X(3872) properties compare event
fractions to those of ?(2S) for different cuts
X(3872) has similar behavior to that of the
charmonium state ?(2S)
41
BS ? µµ- systematic errors
42
Bs mixing reach The Über Formula
Average statistical significance
Moser Roussarie NIM A 384 (1997)
Proper time resolution
Flavor tagging
Signal purity
of reconstructed events
Having a good understanding of all the above
factors means that we are confident about the ?mS
reach of DØ
43
DØ data-taking efficiency
44
DØ Integrated Luminosity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com