TRAFFIC NETWORKS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

TRAFFIC NETWORKS

Description:

Basic Components, Linkages through Boundary Conditions and Network Effects. GOAL. Review basic models and describe ... 7. Cassidy, M. and J. Rudjanakanoknad. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: michae432
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TRAFFIC NETWORKS


1
TRAFFIC NETWORKS
Basic Components, Linkages through Boundary
Conditions and Network Effects
  • C. F. Daganzo
  • (http//www.ce.berkeley.edu/daganzo/)

2
GOAL
Review basic models and describe the macroscopic
phenomena that arises when we link them together
to form networks.
3
A LANE-DROP BOTTLENECK
4
OUTLINE
1. Unify eight single-lane models VT1, VT2,
Newell (queuing, lower order), ACT, CF(L), CA(L)
and CA(M). 2. Composition through lane
changes3. Network effects.
5
A SINGLE STREAM THE DATA
n -1
n 0
n 1
xn(t)
6
3-D VIEW MOSKOWITZS SURFACE
n
n
  • Properties
  • n is a function N(t, x)
  • decreasing in x
  • Properties
  • x is a function X(t, n)
  • decreasing in n

7
THE QUESTION
s
n
  • Given S (or some properties of it) in data
    domain
  • Find S (i.e., the function X or N) in a
    solution domain
  • Requirements well-posedness and realism

8
CLASSIFICATION OF SOLUTION METHODS
9
THE POINT OF REFERENCE PRIMAL VERSION
Nt or q
  • N(t, x) is of H-J form
  • Nt Q(- Nx)

r
qmax
Q
-w
u
ko
?
-Nx or k
  • The arrow of time


10
THE POINT OF REFERENCE DUAL VERSION
  • X and N related by X(t, N(t, x)) x
  • Nt Q(-Nx) becomes
  • Xt V(-Xn) where
  • V(s) sQ(1/s)

11
CLASSIFICATION OF SOLUTION METHODS
12
VARIATIONAL SOLUTION PRIMAL FORM
Theorem 1 all valid paths from B to P have
the same cost, tBP r(vBP), and the cost is
linear in the coordinates of B and P.

Corollary 1 if the boundary and the data are
PWL the minimization is an LP in the unknown B.
13
VARIATIONAL SOLUTION DUAL FORM
u
r
-w
Transformed Fundamental Diagram
  • Cost rate (speed) is also linear (inverse of the
    primal)
  • Theorem All valid paths have the same cost.
  • Corollary PWL problems reduce to LPs.


14
CLASSIFICATION OF SOLUTION METHODS

15
EXAMPLE OF DUAL PROBLEM Looking for X(t, n) ?
xn(t)
  • xn(t) minxn(0) ut, x0(t-tn) wnt
    Newell-car-following. 2
  • Primal analysis Newells queuing formula for
    N(t, x).3

16
CLASSIFICATION OF SOLUTION METHODS

17
SUFFICIENT NETWORKS Discrete space-time
PRIMAL
DUAL
x
n
u
r
-w
t
t
  • Theorem 1 Geometric networks with wave speed
    slopes are sufficient.
  • Theorem 1 If every corner of a PWL boundary is
    a node of a sufficient network, the network
    solution is exact.
  • Translational symmetry allows efficient solution
    with DP.
  • DP solution of primal leads to ACT method 4.
  • DP solution of dual leads to the CF(L) rule 5

x(tt, n1) x(t, n1) mintu, x(t, n) x(t,
n1) sj
18
RECAP SINGLE STREAM MODELS

19
CELLULAR AUTOMATA FORMS
  • DP recursion CF(L) model

x(tt, n1) x(t, n1) mintu, x(t, n) x(t,
n1) sj
  • Dimensionless version

xn1(t1) xn1(t) minu, xn(t) xn1(t) 1
  • CA(L) model

xn1(t1) xn1(t) minu, xn(t)
xn1(t) 1
Theorem 5 CA(L) solves LVP for all n, t with
error 1.
Result 5 CA(L) model has a dual--the CA(M)
model.
20
RECAP SINGLE STREAM MODELS

21
BOTTLENECKS A first step towards composition
r1()
xB(t)
r2()
22
COMPOSITION IN PARALLEL LANE-CHANGING
(ii)
  • Boundary conditions 6
  • (i) Transfer of mass
  • (ii) Transfer of momentum

(i)
  • CF(L) CA(L,M) ACT if lane changes are given

23
COMPOSITION IN PARALLEL LANE-CHANGING
  • Endogenous treatment requires6
  • Generation of mass transfers
  • Optional moves (increase speed)
  • Mandatory moves (destination-based)
  • Constrained motion rules
  • By acceleration/deceleration
  • By inability to overtake

24
COMPOSITION AT INTERSECTIONS
LC Ban
LC Ban
Mandatory LC
Merges
Diverges
25
ON-RAMP MERGE DATA from 7 MODEL from 8
Data
Lane changes
Cumulative flows
Model
Cumulative flows
Lane changes
26
NETWORK EFFECTS AND CHAOS 9
27
OTHER ISSUES
  • The conundrum of route choice (physics) 10
  • Scalability conjectures 9

28
  • QUESTIONS

http//www.ce.berkeley.edu/daganzo/
29
REFERENCES
  • 1. Daganzo, C.F. A variational formulation of
    kinematic waves Basic theory and complex
    boundary conditions Transportation Research B 39
    (2), 187-196 (2005) and A variational
    formulation of kinematic waves Solution methods
    Transportation Research Part B (2005).
  • 2. Newell, G.F. A lower order model
    Transportation Research Part B 36(3) (2002).
  • 3. Newell, G. F. A simplified theory of
    kinematic waves, Parts I, II and III
    Transportation Research Part B, 27 281-313
    (1993).
  • 4. Daganzo, C.F. A theory of supply chains
    Springer, Heidelberg, Germany (2003).
  • 5. Daganzo, C.F. In traffic flow, cellular
    automata kinematic waves Transportation Researc
    h Part B, 40 (5) 396-403 (2006).
  • 6. Laval, J. and Daganzo, C.F. Lane changing in
    traffic streams Transportation Research Part B,
    40, 251-264 (2006).
  • 7. Cassidy, M. and J. Rudjanakanoknad. (2005)
    Increasing Capacity of an Isolated Merge by
    Metering its On-ramp Transportation Research B,
    39B(10) 896-913.
  • 8. Menendez, M. (2006) An analysis of HOV lanes
    their impacts on traffic PhD Thesis, U. of
    California, Berkeley, CA
  • 9. Daganzo, C.F. The nature of urban gridlock
    Transportation Research Part B, (in press).
  • 10. Heydecker, B. and Addison, J. An exact
    expression of dynamic traffic equilibrium J.B.
    Lesort (editor) Proceedings 13th ISTTT, Elsevier
    (1996).

30
QUEUES FROM NOWHERE?
31
AGGREGATION HYPOTHESIS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com