Title: Welcome to UMRs Accreditation SelfStudy Criteria 1 Evidence Collection Workshop
1Welcome to UMRs Accreditation
Self-StudyCriteria 1 Evidence Collection
Workshop
2This is the LAST Workshop
- Data Collection Closes
- May 7, 2007
3The Value of Accreditation
- Institutional Reputation
- Standard of Quality
-
- Incentive for Self Improvement
-
- Transferability of Student Credit Hours
-
- Student Access to Financial Aid
-
4Where Are We Headed?
NCA HLC Comprehensive Team Visit 2/09
Self Study Submission to HLC 9/08
Self Study Complete for Distribution 3/08
Preliminary Self Study Draft 9/07
NCA HLC UMR Liaison Visit 6/13/07
Criterion 1 Evidence Collection 5/7/07
Criterion 25 Evidence Collection 4/23/07
Criterion 4 Evidence Collection 3/25/07
Criterion 3 Evidence Collection 2/07
5UMR Steering Committee
Jerry Bayless, Professor Associate Chair,
School of Engineering Harvest L. Collier, Vice
Provost, Office of Undergrad Graduate Studies
Caroline Fisher, Dean Dept. Chair, School of
Mgmt. Info Systems Ralph E. Flori Jr, Asst.
Dean of Engineering, Dept. of Interdisciplinary
Engineering Amy M. Gillman, Asst. to the Vice
Provost, Office of Undergraduate Graduate
Studies Jay Goff, Dean Enrollment
Management Larry Gragg, Professor Dept. Chair
History Political Science Eddie Gover-Bisker,
Project Specialist, Office of Undergraduate
Graduate
Studies Jeanie Hofer, Director
of International Cultural Affairs Wayne
Huebner, Professor Dept. Chair Materials
Science Engineering Jim Murphy, Assistant Vice
Chancellor of Student Affairs Emily Petersen,
Acting Director, Institutional Research
Assessment Laura Stoll, Registrar Henry Allen
Wiebe, Dean, School of Extended Learning
6WHAT HAVE WE BEEN DOING?
- Organization of Evidence
- IT Archive for online access to all evidence
- Criterion 1-5
- Core Components
- Evaluative Narrative
- What we do best
- What we have learned
- Opportunities for continual improvement
7MODEL SELF STUDY DOCUMENT PAGE
University of Missouri-Rolla
Criterion 3 Student Learning and Effective
Teaching
UMR Experiential Learning
The University of Missouri-Rolla has established
a rich history of demonstrated student learning
and teaching effectiveness. Inherent in its
strong focus in science and engineering education
is the require- ment to provide student engaged
learning around experiential education activities
that foster definitive and practical learning
outcomes that are characterized by our students
ability to solve technical problems.
UMR Self Study Repository
Core Component 3b The organization values and
supports effective teaching
UMR Teacher Recognition Programs
What UMR does best
GRAPHIC 5-year history of teacher recognition
UMR Experiential Learning
INSERT NARRATIVE THAT SUMMARIZES UMR BEST
PRACTICES
UMR Experiential Learning
What UMR has learned
INSERT NARRATIVE THAT SUMMARIZES UMR LESSONS
LEARNED
GRAPHIC 5-year history of campus teaching
resource workshops
UMR Self Study Home
UMR opportunities for improvement
UMR Home
INSERT NARRATIVE THAT SUMMARIZES UMR
OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT
8Evidence Collection Update
- Criterion 3 - 31 Collected
- Criterion 4 - 25 Collected
- Criteria 2 5 15 Collected
- Criterion 1 - 10 Collected (Due May 7)
- Depts./Units Submitting 1-5 by May 7th 19
- If you plan to submit all your evidence at one
time please notify us so that we can better
track submissions.
9Reaccreditation Timeline
- Spring 2007 Evidence Collection
- September 2007 Completed Draft Self-Study Report
- September 2008 Self-Study Report Submitted to
HLC - February 23-25, 2009 Evaluation Visit
- Summer 2009 Decision by HLC Board of Trustees
10Template Structure Review
11Examples should Emphasize
- Activities (What does your unit/division do to
meet the criteria?) - Processes used to assess and evaluate the
activities (How do you assess?) - Analysis of the assessment information (What did
you find out?) - Feedback loop to improve (What did you change as
a result of the assessment?) - What happened as a result of the change?
- How are you continuing to use assessment to
improve? - Can you document that you use this data for
improvement of your unit/division? - Strengths? Opportunities for improvement?
12Criteria One Mission Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to
ensure the fulfillment of its mission through
structures and processes that involve the board,
administration, faculty, staff, and students.
Core Component 1a The organizations mission
documents are clear and articulate publicly the
organizations commitments. Core Component 1b
In its mission documents, the organization
recognizes the diversity of its learners, other
constituencies, and the greater society it
serves. Core Component 1c Understanding of
and support for the mission pervade the
organization. Core Component 1d The
organizations governance and administrative
structures promote effective leadership and
support collaborative processes that enable the
organization to fulfill its mission. Core
Component 1e The organization upholds and
protects its integrity.
13UMR Strategic Plan Version 3.8http//www.umr.edu/
provost/strategicplan/
Mission The mission of the University of
Missouri-Rolla is to discover, convey, and apply
knowledge to solve problems in a technical world.
Vision The vision of the University of
Missouri-Rolla is to be a top-five technological
research university by 2011.
14UMR Strategic Plan Version 3.8
Values Tradition We are a community of
hard-working problem-solvers who draw
inspiration, strength, and pride from our
traditions and history, our entrepreneurial
spirit, and our students success. Interdisciplin
ary Collaboration We respect the entire realm of
human knowledge and seek to transcend traditional
boundaries in the pursuit of our goals.
Inclusiveness We encourage and depend upon
mutual recognition and respect for the voluntary
cooperative efforts of our diverse constituents
to participate appropriately in shared governance
to lead the way in sustaining a strong and
cohesive scholarly community. Excellence We
embrace excellence, integrity, and mutual respect
in our teaching, research, and service.
15UMR Strategic Plan Version 3.8
- Strategic Objectives
- Enrich the Student Experience
- Broaden the Academic Portfolio and Increase
Enrollment - Expand and Elevate Research Performance and
Reputation - Identify Opportunities and Secure Resources from
External Constituencies
16Criteria 1Criteria Core Components Overview
17Criteria One Mission Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to
ensure the fulfillment of its mission through
structures and processes that involve the board,
administration, faculty, staff, and students.
Core Component 1a The organizations mission
documents are clear and articulate publicly the
organizations commitments. Core Component 1b
In its mission documents, the organization
recognizes the diversity of its learners, other
constituencies, and the greater society it
serves. Core Component 1c Understanding of
and support for the mission pervade the
organization. Core Component 1d The
organizations governance and administrative
structures promote effective leadership and
support collaborative processes that enable the
organization to fulfill its mission. Core
Component 1e The organization upholds and
protects its integrity.
18Examples of Evidence
- Core Component 1a The organizations mission
documents are clear and articulate publicly the
organizations commitments. - Adopted statements of mission, vision, values,
goals and organizational priorities that clearly
and broadly define mission - The mission, vision, values, and goals documents
define the constituencies served - The mission includes a strong commitment to high
academic standards that sustain and advance
excellenct in higher learning - Mission states goals for student learning
- Mission is regularly evaluated revised
- Mission is available to public
19Examples of Evidence
- Core Component 1b In its mission documents,
the organization recognizes the diversity of its
learners, other constituencies, and the greater
society it serves. - Mission addresses diversity function in
multicultural society - Mission affirms commitment to honor the dignity
and worth of individuals - Codes of belief or expected behavior are
congruent with the mission - The mission provides a basis for basic strategies
to address diversity
20Examples of Evidence
- Core Component 1c Understanding of and support
for the mission pervade the organization. - Boards, administration, faculty, staff and
students understand and support the mission - Strategic Decisions are mission driven
- Planning Budgeting flow from and support the
mission - The goals are congruent with the mission
- Internal constituents articulate the mission
consistently
21Examples of Evidence
- Core Component 1d The organizations
governance and administrative structures promote
effective leadership and support collaborative
processes that enable the organization to fulfill
its mission. - Policies and practices document focus on the
mission - Persons are enabled to exercise effective
leadership - Distribution of responsibilities defined by
structure, processes and activities is understood
and implemented - Faculty and leaders share responsibility for
coherent curriculum and integrity of academic
processes - Effective communication
- Structures and processes regularly evaluated and
strengthened
22Examples of Evidence
- Core Component 1e The organization upholds and
protects its integrity. - Activities in Congruence with mission
- Operations are legal, responsible and fiscally
honest - Knowing and abiding by relevant laws and
regulations - Implementation of clear and fair policies
- Structure policies ensure integrity of co
curricular and auxiliary activities - Fair dealing
- Honest accurate reporting to public
- Documentation of timely response to complaints
and grievances, particularly those of students
23Specific Example Descriptions
24School of Mgmt. Info Systems Example Criterion
1a
- 1a The organizations mission documents are
clear and articulate publicly the organizations
commitments. - The School of Management and Information Systems
(SMIS) created a mission statement and submitted
it to both faculty and advisory board for
approval. - The mission statement is reviewed every five
years by the SMIS executive committee, or more
frequently if someone suggests a major change.
It is again submitted to the advisory board and
faculty for approval. - The mission statement is not five years old as
yet, so it has not been reviewed. - (This is an excerpt, to see the full text example
please see the examples online.)
http//accreditation.umr.edu/
25Admissions Dept. Example Criteria 1b
- 1b In its mission documents, the organization
recognizes the diversity of its learners, other
constituencies, and the greater society it
serves. - The Admissions mission states campus enrollment
goals and accepts goals for ethnicity, gender,
and major. - Strategic Plan is distributed and discussed at
annual staff meeting - Annual Recruitment Plan Goals for student
numbers, revenue generation, diversity of
academic majors, academic level and geography - Annual goal to maintain or increase visit
opportunities with emphasis on specific majors
and populations - Opportunity for improvement add review mission
statement, statement "to work effectively as team
members in a diverse environment" to our summer
retreat - (This is an excerpt, to see the full text
- example please see the examples online.)
- http//accreditation.umr.edu/
26Business Services Dept. Example Criterion 1c
- 1c Understanding of and support for the
mission pervade the organization. - Business Services (mission posted on web)
supports the campus mission, vision, and goal by - providing development and review of a variety of
agreements for activities as professional
services, performances, and facilities use to
help ensure a sound business approach and,
through interaction with staff of the UM General
Counsel's Office - providing negotiations for and facilitation of
the purchase, sale and lease of real estate, - serving as a resource for non-medical insurance
issues - assisting in efforts to maintain good employee
relations by investigating and deciding staff
grievance appeals - (This is an excerpt, to see the full
- text example please go online.)
- http//accreditation.umr.edu/
27School of Mgmt. Info Systems Example Criterion
1d
- 1d The organizations governance and
administrative structures promote effective
leadership and support collaborative processes
that enable the organization to fulfill its
mission. - SMIS is governed by an executive committee that
consists of the dean, associate deans, three
department chairs, and directors of departments.
- The executive committee meets at least biweekly
to share information, discuss issues, and make
decisions. - Each department chair, associate dean, and
director meets biweekly with the dean to discuss
performance and issues. - (This is an excerpt, to see the full text example
please see the examples online.)
http//accreditation.umr.edu/
28Physical Facilities Example Criterion 1e
- 1e The organization upholds and protects its
integrity. - Physical Facilities abides by all Federal, State
Local laws - Monitors own design and implementation along with
contractor work - Monitored by The Department of Natural Resources
(DNR) and the system design office - Designs buildings and projects to adhere to
current codes - Adheres to all Federal regulations on
environmental issues and Americans Disability
Act, (ADA) - Standing notice on needs for accessibility to our
facilities - Strives to ensure buildings are pleasant for all
faculty, staff and students - Licenses are retested annually in order to stay
current with the new laws. - (This is an excerpt, to see the full text
- please go online.)
- http//accreditation.umr.edu/
29Breakout Session
- Break up into groups of 5
- Select a Core Component of Criterion 1 or 5 (5
minutes) - Share Evidences (5 minutes)
- Report
30Questions
- http//accreditation.umr.edu/